Elsevier

Cytokine

Volume 9, Issue 7, July 1997, Pages 521-528
Cytokine

Regular article
MIGRATION RESPONSES OF HUMAN MONOCYTIC CELL LINES TO α- AND β-CHEMOKINES

https://doi.org/10.1006/cyto.1996.0196Get rights and content

Abstract

The β-chemokines monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1), macrophage inflammatory protein 1 alpha (MIP-1α), MIP-1β and regulated on activation, normal T cells, expressed and secreted (RANTES) induced the in vitro migration of the monocytic cell line MonoMac-6. MCP-1 exhibits the most potent chemotactic effect on this cell line while MIP-1α, RANTES and to a lesser extent MIP-1β were more moderate inducers of cell migration. MonoMac-6 migration in response to chemokines was shown to be a chemotactic and not a chemokinetic response, which was inhibited by pertussis and cholera toxins suggesting a role for G proteins in chemokine receptor-mediated signalling in these cells; chemotaxis of MonoMac-6 cells in response to MCP-1 was abrogated by the addition of anti-MCP-1 antibody. The response of MonoMac-6 cells to the α-chemokines IL-8, IP-10, growth-related peptide (Gro) α and MIP-2β was substantially weaker than to the β-chemokines. MCP-1 caused an alteration in cellular morphology by increasing ruffling at the cell membrane and the number of cells exhibiting extended pseudopodia. The chemotactic response of MonoMac-6 cells to β-chemokines was compared with less well-differentiated myelomonocytic cell lines. THP-1 showed a similar, but weaker response to the β-chemokines while both HL60 and U937 failed to respond to any member of this subfamily when tested under the same conditions. These results suggest that the differentiation status of cells of monocytic lineage may affect their response to β-chemokines.

References (0)

Cited by (59)

  • Rac1 plays a role in CXCL12 but not CCL3-induced chemotaxis and Rac1 GEF inhibitor NSC23766 has off target effects on CXCR4

    2018, Cellular Signalling
    Citation Excerpt :

    Specifically, Cdc42 and Rac1 regulate filopodia and lamellopodia formation, respectively, while RhoA regulates stress fibres and focal adhesion [19]. It has been well documented that activation of chemokine receptors leads to the occurrence of actin stress fibres and membrane ruffling [20–22]. It has also been shown that the blocking of RhoA or ROCK (rho-activated kinase) prevents migration of cells [16].

  • S1P-Dependent Trafficking of Intracellular Yersinia pestis through Lymph nodes establishes buboes and systemic infection

    2014, Immunity
    Citation Excerpt :

    By real-time PCR, we determined substantial increases in the expression of chemokines, including CCL2, CCL3, CCL4, and CXCL10 (also known as MCP-1, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, and IP-10, respectively) within dLNs with Y. pestis infection, compared to saline controls (Figures 2F and S6). Each of these chemokines has a well-established role in the recruitment of monocytes, DCs, and/or macrophages (Cross et al., 1997; Shi and Pamer, 2011). In order to compare Y. pestis-induced chemokine increases within the context of other infections, we also examined the chemokine production in LNs to two other Gram-negative pathogens, Escherichia coli (where infection remains confined to the site of infection) and Salmonella Typhimurium (which has well-established dLN-targeting adaptations) (St John and Abraham, 2009).

  • Human and murine model cell lines for dendritic cell biology evaluated

    2008, Immunology Letters
    Citation Excerpt :

    Moreover, THP-1 show directed migration towards several chemokines important for DC migration, while HL-60 cells can only do so when differentiated towards monocytes [70]. In contrast to primary DCs, however, neither of these two cell-types switch to a high-speed migration mode in response to maturation [71]. Relative to primary DCs, MUTZ-DCs are poorly adhesive, even in the immature state, but similar to DCs, MUTZ-DCs acquire a more migratory phenotype in response to maturation (our own observations).

  • Intestinal neuro-epithelial interactions modulate neuronal chemokines production

    2006, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
View all citing articles on Scopus
f1

Correspondence to: R. C. Rees, Department of Life Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Clifton Lane, Notingham NG11 8NS, UK

View full text