Review article
Control of actin dynamics in cell motility1

https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1997.1062Get rights and content

Abstract

Actin polymerization plays a major role in cell movement. The controls of actin sequestration/desequestration and of filament turnover are two important features of cell motility. Actin binding proteins use properties derived from the steady-state monomer-polymer cycle of actin in the presence of ATP, to control the F-actin/G-actin ratio and the turnover rate of actin filaments. Capping proteins and profilin regulate the size of the pools of F-actin and unassembled actin by affecting the steady-state concentration of ATP-G-actin. At steady state, the treadmilling cycle of actin filaments is fed by their disassembly from the pointed ends. It is regulated in two different ways by capping proteins and ADF, as follows. Capping proteins, in decreasing the number of growing barbed ends, increase their individual rate of growth and create a “funneled” treadmilling process. ADF/cofilin, in increasing the rate of pointed-end disassembly, increases the rate of filament turnover, hence the rate of barbed-end growth. In conclusion, capping proteins and ADF cooperate to increase the rate of actin assembly up to values that support the rates of actin-based motility processes.

Introduction

It is now well accepted that cell locomotion and, more generally, changes in cell shape in response to stimuli are powered by actin polymerization (Condeelis, 1993). Physical analyses show that actin polymerization can provide a protrusive force sufficient to overcome the resistance of the cell membrane Cortese et al 1989, Mogilner and Oster 1996. In recent years, two aspects of the involvement of actin polymerization in motility have given rise to intense investigations.

First, a shape change of the cell in response to stimuli often necessitates a massive polymerization of actin filaments. The stimulation of blood platelets, neutrophils or chemotactic amoebae, is rapidly followed by a large increase in the cellular amount of F-actin. The increase in the F-actin pool correlates with an identical decrease in the pool of “sequestered actin”, i.e. G-actin in complex with proteins that prevent actin from polymerizing, such as thymosin-β4 and profilin. The mechanism of control of the F-actin/G-actin ratio in cells is a key issue in motility.

Another fascinating feature of cell motility is the use of rapid actin filament turnover to generate movement. Continuous assembly of actin filaments at the leading edge of locomoting cells builds up the protrusive filopodial or lamellipodial extensions of the cytoplasm that determine the direction of movement. While net polymerization occurs at the front, net depolymerization occurs at the rear of the lamella. The rate of movement is 1 to 10 μm/min. For the advance of the lamellipodium to be driven by actin polymerization, the rate of filament growth at the leading edge would have to be as fast as 10 to 100 subunits per second. A key issue is to understand by which mechanism a cell can “maintain high rates of net polymerization and net depolymerization simultaneously at different sites in its cytoplasm” (Fechheimer & Zigmond, 1993). In such a steady regime of locomotion, the overall cellular F-actin content remains constant. The actin subunits coming from filaments depolymerizing at the rear of the lamella are recycled into new filaments assembled at the front in the seemingly rapid treadmilling process observed in locomoting keratocytes Wang 1985, Small 1995. Early evidence for the autonomy of the lamella as a motile machine has been provided (Euteneuer & Schliwa, 1984).

Bacterial pathogens such as Listeria monocytogenes or Shigella flexneri (Higley & Way, 1997, for a review) mimic the dynamic behavior of actin filaments at the leading edge. They elicit their own propulsion in the cytoplasm by inducing actin polymerization at their surface. The movement can be monitored in vitro in acellular extracts Theriot et al 1994, Marchand et al 1995, which provide a basis for identifying the cellular components of the motile machinery involved in actin nucleation at the plasma membranes and eventually reconstituting actin-based motile processes in a controlled medium.

In this short review, we will survey the principles of actin polymerization that are used by different actin binding proteins either to regulate actin desequestration, thus eliciting massive assembly of filaments, or to control actin filament turnover, thus mediating the forward movement of the leading edge.

Section snippets

The steady state of F-actin assembly in the presence of ATP

At the physiological ionic strength, in the presence of ATP, filaments (F-actin) coexist with monomeric actin (G-actin) at the critical concentration for polymerization. Because ATP hydrolysis is associated with actin polymerization, the critical concentration is not, in this case, a physical monomer-polymer equilibrium dissociation constant. It is the steady-state concentration at ATP-G-actin, CSS, that is maintained in the medium via monomer-polymer exchange reactions. In the cell medium,

Control of actin sequestration/desequestration

The critical concentration of ATP-G-actin at steady state therefore is buffered by the filaments to a value that is tightly controlled by the extent of capping. The concentration of sequestered monomeric actin, in the presence of a given total amount of G-actin binding protein, is solely determined by the value of the concentration of ATP-G-actin at steady state, CSS, due to the effect of the law of mass action, and by the total concentration of G-actin sequestering protein, [S0], as described

Regulation of actin filament turnover by capping proteins and ADF/cofilin

As outlined above, the rate of treadmilling of F-actin in vitro is extremely slow, while in vivo filaments turn over at a much faster rate and appear especially dynamic in motile lamellipodia, where they turn over in a treadmilling-like process Wang 1985, Zigmond 1993, Small 1995. The actin-based propulsive movement of L. monocytogenes offers another example of rapid turnover, with filament half-lives of 30 to 60 seconds (Theriot et al., 1992). The difference in the kinetics of filament

Conclusions and perspectives

The observations of actin dynamics in living cells strongly suggest that the polymerization of actin, which powers the movement of the lamellipodium or of L. monocytogenes, results from the steady-state ATPase cycle of actin. The ADF-enhanced funneled treadmilling process presented here shows that the known principles of actin polymerization at steady state are sufficient to account for the increase in the rate of barbed-end assembly induced by capping proteins and ADF.

This model points to the

Acknowledgements

This work was funded in part by the Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer (ARC), the Association Française contre les Myopathies (AFM), the EC (grant no. CHRX-CT94-0652) and the Ligue Nationale Française contre le Cancer.

References (46)

  • H.-Q. Sun et al.

    Actin monomer binding proteins

    Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.

    (1995)
  • H.-Q. Sun et al.

    Beta-thymosins are not simple actin monomer buffering proteins. Insights from overexpression studies

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1996)
  • J.A. Theriot et al.

    Involvement of profilin in the actin-based motility of L. monocytogenes in cells and in cell-free extracts

    Cell

    (1994)
  • A. Wegner

    Head to tail polymerization of actin

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (1976)
  • M.D. Welch et al.

    Actin dynamics in vivo

    Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.

    (1997)
  • W. Witke et al.

    Hemostatic, inflammatory, and fibroblast responses are blunted in mice lacking gelsolin

    Cell

    (1995)
  • H. Abe et al.

    Xenopus laevis actin-depolymerizing factor/cofilina phosphorylation-regulated protein essential for development

    J. Cell Biol.

    (1996)
  • H. Aizawa et al.

    Over expression of cofilin stimulates bundling of actin filaments, membrane ruffling and cell movement in Dictyostelium

    J. Cell Biol.

    (1996)
  • K. Barkalow et al.

    Coordinated regulation of platelet actin filament barbed ends by gelsolin and capping protein

    J. Cell Biol.

    (1996)
  • F. Buss et al.

    Distribution of profilin in fibroblasts correlates with the presence of highly dynamic actin filaments

    Cell Motil. Cystoskel.

    (1992)
  • M.-F. Carlier et al.

    Modulation of the interaction between G-actin and thymosinβ4 by the ATP/ADP ratiopossible implication in the regulation of actin dynamics

    Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA

    (1993)
  • M.-F. Carlier et al.

    Actin depolymerizing factor (ADF/cofilin) enhances the rate of filament turnoverimplication in actin-based motility

    J. Cell Biol.

    (1997)
  • L. Cassimeris et al.

    Thymosin β4 sequesters the majority of G-actin in resting human polymorphonuclear leukocytes

    J. Cell Biol.

    (1992)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Edited by N.-H. Chua

    View full text