Short CommunicationPhylogenetic Relationships among Species Groups of the virilis–repleta Radiation of Drosophila
References (25)
- et al.
Phylogenetic analysis of the repleta species group of the genus Drosophila using multiple sources of characters
Mol. Phylogenet. Evol.
(2000) - et al.
Testing significance of incongruence
Cladistics
(1994) - et al.
Character congruence of multiple data partitions and the origin of the Hawaiian Drosophilidae
Mol. Phylogenet. Evol.
(1998) - et al.
A compact gene cluster in Drosophila: The unrelated Cs gene is compressed between duplicated amd and Ddc
Gene
(1999) - et al.
Ddc and amd sequences resolve phylogenetic relationships of Drosophila
Mol. Phylogenet. Evol.
(2001) - et al.
Sequence and structure of the dopa decarboxylase gene of Drosophila: Evidence for novel RNA splicing variants
EMBO J.
(1986) - et al.
The Drosophila Genome Map: A Practical Guide
(1995) - et al.
Phylogenetic position of the subgenus Lordiphosa of the genus Drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae) inferred from alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh) gene sequences
J. Mol. Evol
(2000) - et al.
Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea
J. Mol. Evol.
(1989) Gene trees in species trees
Syst. Biol.
(1997)
Molecular localization, developmental expression and nucleotide sequence of the alpha-methyldopa hypersensitive gene of Drosophila
Genetics
Molecular phylogeny and genome evolution in the Drosophila virilis species group: Duplications of the alcohol dehydrogenase gene
Mol. Biol. Evol.
Cited by (28)
Monophyly, divergence times, and evolution of host plant use inferred from a revised phylogeny of the Drosophila repleta species group
2012, Molecular Phylogenetics and EvolutionCitation Excerpt :Based on the current distribution of the most generally ancestral genera within the subfamilies Opuntoideae, Cactoideae, and Pereskioideae, the arid lands in Peru and Bolivia may be the centers of origin for all cacti (Edwards et al., 2005). Here we present molecular phylogenetic analyses based on four mitochondrial and six nuclear gene regions from 62 ingroup and nine outgroup taxa belonging to the virilis–repleta radiation (Throckmorton, 1975; Tatarenkov and Ayala, 2001). Sampling included five of the six proposed subgroups (only the inca subgroup was missing) and ca. 60% of the described species.
On the phylogeny of the Drosophila hydei subgroup: New insights from combined analyses of nuclear and mitochondrial data
2007, Molecular Phylogenetics and EvolutionMolecular phylogeny of the Drosophila virilis section (Diptera: Drosophilidae) based on mitochondrial and nuclear sequences
2006, Molecular Phylogenetics and EvolutionPhylogeny and molecular evolution of the Drosophila hydei subgroup (Drosophila repleta group) inferred from the Xanthine dehydrogenase gene
2005, Molecular Phylogenetics and EvolutionCitation Excerpt :Spicer and Pitnick (1996), employing mitochondrial DNA markers, showed concordance between chromosomal data and molecular analysis in the hydei subgroup, supporting the monophyletic origin of the hydei complex with strong statistical significance; but providing little support for the bifurca complex. Other studies on the molecular phylogeny of the repleta group, in which at least two species of the hydei subgroup are included, confirm that this subgroup is a monophyletic unit (Durando et al., 2000; Russo et al., 1995; Tatarenkov and Ayala, 2001). This study is an attempt to elucidate the present questions regarding the evolutionary relationships among the species of the hydei subgroup, using molecular data and including species that have never been studied at the molecular level, such as D. novemaristata and D. guayllabambae.
Molecular phylogeny of the subgenus Drosophila (Diptera, Drosophilidae) with an emphasis on Neotropical species and groups: A nuclear versus mitochondrial gene approach
2005, Molecular Phylogenetics and EvolutionA supermatrix-based molecular phylogeny of the family Drosophilidae
2010, Genetics Research
- 1
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: 949-824-2474. E-mail: [email protected].