Skip to main content
Log in

Peer teaching and higher level cognitive learning outcomes in problem-based learning

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Law education at the University of Limburg (Maastricht, The Netherlands) features small-group tutorials alternating with periods of independent study. Every group of 10 students was tutored by a staff member or an undergraduate student from the third or fourth year. Students guided by a staff member scored significantly higher on a test designed to measure higher order cognitive skills than students guided by a student tutor. Student tutors were rated no differently from staff tutors with respect to the way they stimulated learning processes, directed the discussion content and monitored the discussion process. It seems that in a quantitative way, staff tutors and student tutors behave more or less the same. Qualitatively, however, there may be differences in their behavior which the tutor functioning questionnaire is unable to tap. Interventions of staff tutors may be more to the point than those of student tutors due to the fact that they are experts in their fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cate, Th. J. ten (1986). Leren in groepen zonder docent (Learning in Teacherless Groups. University of Amsterdam: Unpublished doctoral dissertation.

  • Cornwall, M.G. (1979). Students as Teachers: Peer Teaching in Higher Education. University of Amsterdam: C.O.W.O.

  • De Volder, M.L., de Grave, W.S. & Gijselaers, W.H. (1985). ‘Peer teaching: Academic achievement of teacher-led versus student-led discussion groups’, Higher Education, 14, 643–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grave, de, W.S., De Volder, M.L., Gijselaers, W.H. & Damoiseaux, V. (in press). ‘Peer teaching and problem-based learning: Tutor characteristics, group functioning and student achievement’, in: Schmidt, H.G., Lipkin Jr. M., de Vries, M.W. & Greep, J.M. (eds.), Education for Tomorrow's Medicine Today. New York: Springer.

  • Goldschmid, B. & Goldschmid, M.L. (1976). ‘Peer teaching in higher education: A review’, Higher Education, 5, 9–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moust, J.H.C. & Nuy, H.J.P. (1987). ‘Preparing teachers for a problem-based student-centered law course’, The Journal of Professional Legal Education, 5, 16–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D.A. (1978). ‘Notes toward a theory of complex learning’, in: A.M. Lesgold, J.W. Pellegrino, S.D. Fokkema & R. Glaser (eds.), Cognitive Psychology and Instruction. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, R.J. (1966). Ethics and Education. London: Allen and Urwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rummelhart, D.E. & Norman, D.A. (1978). ‘Accretion, tuning and restructuring: Three modes of learning’, in J.W. Cotton & R.L. Klatzky (eds.), Semantic Factors in Cognition. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H.G. & De Volder, M.L. (eds.) (1984). Tutorials in Problem-Based Learning. Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moust, J.H.C., De Volder, M.L. & Nuy, H.J.P. Peer teaching and higher level cognitive learning outcomes in problem-based learning. High Educ 18, 737–742 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00155664

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00155664

Keywords

Navigation