Skip to main content
Log in

Adaptive evolution in the rat olfactory receptor gene family

  • Published:
Journal of Molecular Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Comparison of DNA sequences of the rat (Rattus norvegicus) olfactory receptor gene family revealed an unusual pattern of nucleotide substitution in the gene region encoding the second extracellular domain (E2) of the protein. In this domain, nonsynonymous nucleotide differences between members of this subfamily that caused a change in amino acid residue polarity were over four times more frequent than nonsynonymous differences that did not cause a polarity change. This nonrandom pattern of nucleotide substitution is evidence of past directional selection favoring diversification of the E2 domain among members of this subfamily. This in turn suggests that E2 may play some important role in the functions unique to each member of the olfactory receptor family, and that it may perhaps be an odorant binding domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beets MGJ (1978) Odor and stimulant structure. In: Carterette C, Friedman MP (eds) Handbook of perception: vol. VIa, Tasting and smelling. Academic Press, New York, pp 245–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck L, Axel R (1991) A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: a molecular basis for odor recognition. Cell 65:175–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg SP, Brewer MT, Verderber E, Heimdal P, Brandhuber BJ, Thompson RC (1991) Interleukin 1 receptor antagonist is a member of the interleukin 1 gene family: evolution of a cytokine control mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 5232–5236

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman M, Moore GW, Matsuda G (1975) Darwinian evolution in the genealogy of hemoglobin. Nature 253:603–608

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamm HE, Deretic D, Arendt A, Hargrove PA, Koenig B, Hofmann KP (1988) Site of G protein binding to rhodopsin mapping with synthetic peptides to the a subunit. Science 241:832–835

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes AI (1991) Circumsporozoite protein gene of malaria parasites (Plasmodium spp.): evidence for positive selection on immunogenic regions. Genetics 127:345–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes AL, Nei M (1988) Pattern of nucleotide substitution at major histocompatibility complex class I loci reveals over-dominant selection. Nature 335:167–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes AL, Nei M (1989) Nucleotide substitution at major histocompatibility complex class II loci: evidence for overdominant selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:958–962

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes AL, Ota T, Nei M(1990) Positive Darwinian selection promotes charge profile diversity in the antigen-binding cleft of class I major-histocompatibility molecules. Mol Biol Evol 7:515–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura M, Ohta T (1974) On some principles governing molecular evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 71:2848–2852

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobilka BK, Kobilka TS, Daniel K, Regan JW, Caron MG, Lefkowitz RJ (1988) Chimeric α22 R2-adrenergic receptors: delineation of domains involved in effector coupling and ligand binding specificity. Science 240:1310–1316

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee Y-H, Vacquier V (1992) The divergence of species-specific abalone sperm lysins is promoted by positive Darwinian selection. Biol Bull 182:97–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Li W-H (1983) Evolution of duplicate genes and pseudogenes. In: Nei M, Koehn RK (eds) Evolution of genes and proteins. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, pp 14–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Li W-H (1989) A statistical test of phylogenies estimated from sequence data. Mol Biol Evol 6:424–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Mollon J (1991) Hue and the heptahelicals. Nature 351:696–697

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei M, Gojobori T (1986) Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. Mol Biol Evol 3:418–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei M, Jin L (1989) Variances of the average numbers of nucleotide substitutions within and between populations. Mol Biol Evol 6:290–300

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Dowd BF, Lefkowitz RJ, Caron MG (1989) Structure of the adrenergic and related receptors. Ann Rev Neurosci 12:67–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohno S, Wolf U, Atkin NB (1968) Evolution from fish to mammals by gene duplication. Hereditas 59:169–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen N (1951) The study of instinct. Clarendon Press, Oxford, p 195

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler JW (1977) Properties of compounds uses as chemical signals. In: Miiller-Scwarze D, Mozell MM (eds) Chemical signals in vertebrates. Plenum Press, New York, pp 61–70

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Offprint requests to: A.L. Hughes

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hughes, A.L., Hughes, M.K. Adaptive evolution in the rat olfactory receptor gene family. J Mol Evol 36, 249–254 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00160480

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00160480

Key words

Navigation