Skip to main content
Log in

Attentional demands for static and dynamic equilibrium

  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Upright standing and walking tasks require the integration of several sources of sensory information. In a normal and highly predictable environment, locomotor synergies involving several muscles may take place at lower spinal levels with neural circuitry tuned by local loops of assistance or self-organizing processes generated in coordinative networks. When ongoing regulation of gait is necessary (obstacles, changes in direction) supraspinal involvement is necessary to perform movements adapted to the environment. Using a classical information processing framework and a dual-task methodology, it is possible to evaluate the attentional demands for performing static and dynamic equilibrium tasks. The present experiment evaluates whether the attentional requirements for a control sitting condition and for standing and walking conditions vary with the intrinsic balance demands of the tasks. The results show that standing and walking conditions required more attention than sitting in a chair. The attentional cost for walking was also significantly greater than for standing. For the walking task, reaction times when subjects were in singlesupport phase (small base of support) were significantly longer than those in double-support phase, suggesting that the attentional demands increased with an increase in the balance requirements of the task. Balance control requires a continuous regulation and integration of sensory inputs; increasing balance demands loads the higher level cognitive system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abernethy B (1988) Dual-task methodology and motor skills research: some applications and methodological constraints. J Hum Mov Stud 14:101–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong DM (1988) The supraspinal control of mammalian locomotion. J Physiol (Lond) 405:1–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong DM, Edgley DM (1984) Discharges of nucleus interpositus neurones during locomotion in the cat. J Physiol (Lond) 351:411–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardy BG, Laurent M (1991) Visual cues and attention demands in locomotor positioning. Percep Mot Skills 72:915–926

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappozzo A, Figura F, Marchetti M (1976) The interplay of muscular and external forces in human ambulation. J Biomech 9:35–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter MC, Smith JL (1986) Simultaneous control of two rhythmical behaviours. II. Hindlimb walking with paw shake response in spinal cat. J Neurophysiol 56:184–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen AH, Rossignol S, Grillner S (1988) Neural control of rhythmic movements in vertebrates, Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz V (1992) Neuronal control of stance and gait. In: Stelmach GE, Requin J (eds) Tutorials in motor behavior II. Elsevier, New York, pp 483–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew T (1988) Motor cortical cell discharge during voluntary gait modification. Brain Res 457:181–187

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forssberg H (1979) Stumbling corrective reaction: a phase-dependent compensatory reaction during locomotion. J Neurophysiol 42:936–953

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geurts CH, Mulder TW, Nienhuis B, Rijken AJ (1991) Dual-task assessment of reorganization of postural control in persons with lower limb amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 72:1059–1064

    Google Scholar 

  • Geurts AC, Mulder TW, Nienhuis B, Rijken AJ (1992) Postural reorganization following lower limb amputation. Scand J Rehab Med 24:83–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Girouard Y (1980) L'attention et l'acquisition de l'habileté motrice. In: Nadeau CH, Halliwell WR, Newell KM, Roberts GC (eds) Psychology of motor behavior and sport. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 535–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Grillner S (1975) Locomotion in vertebrates: central mechanisms and reflex interaction. Physiol Rev 55:247–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Grillner S (1981) Control of locomotion in bipeds, tetrapods and fish. In: Brooks V (ed) Handbook of physiology, Sect 1, The nervous system, vol 2. American Physiological Society, Bethesda, pp 1179–1236

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D (1973) Attention and effort, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelso JAS, Schöner G (1988) Self-organization of coordinative movement patterns. Hum Mov Sci 7:27–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr B, Condon SM, McDonald LA (1985) Cognitive spatial processing and the regulation of posture. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 11:617–622

    Google Scholar 

  • Massion J (1984) Postural changes accompanying voluntary movements: normal and pathological aspects. Hum Neurobiol 2:261–267

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon TA (1984) Mechanics of locomotion. Int J Robotics Res 3:4–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Mochon S, McMahon TA (1980) Ballistic walking. J Biomech 13:49–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Paillard J (1985) Les niveaux sensorimoteur et cognitif du contrôle de l'action. In: Laurent M, Therme P (eds) Recherches en activité, physique et sportive 1. Publication du Centre de Recherche de l'U.E.R.E.P.S., Marseille, pp 147–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Paillard J (1988) Posture and locomotion: old problems and new concepts. In: Amblard B, Berthoz A, Clarac F (eds) Posture and gait: development, adaptation and modulation. Elsevier, Amsterdam New York, pp 5–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman R (1981) Sustained attention: a multifactorial approach. In: Long J, Baddeley A (eds) Attention and performance IX. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 493–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Patla AE, Prentice SD, Robinson C, Neufeld J (1991) Visual control of locomotion: strategies for changing direction and for going over obstacles. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 17:603–634

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson K (1976) The control of walking. Sci Am 235:72–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner MI, Keele SW (1969) Attention demands of movements. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth Congress of Applied Psychology. Swets and Zeitlinger, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner MI, Petersen SE (1990) The attention system of the human brain. Annu Rev Neurosci 13:25–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozzo T, Berthoz A, Lefort L (1990) Head stabilization during various locomotor tasks in humans. Exp Brain Res 82:97–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossignol S, Drew T (1985) Interactions of segmental and suprasegmental inputs with the spinal pattern generator of locomotion. In: Barnes WJ, Gladden MH (eds) Feedback and motor control in invertebrates and vertebrates. Croom Helm, London, pp 355–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossignol S, Lund JP, Drew T (1988) The role of sensory inputs in regulating patterns of rhythmical movements in higher vertebrates. In: Cohen A, Rossignol S, Grillner S (eds) Neural control of rhythmic movements in vertebrates. Wiley, New York, pp 201–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Sajiki N, Isagoda A, Moriai N, Nakamura R (1989) Reaction time during walking. Percept Mot Skills 62:259–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Schöner G (1990) A dynamic theory of coordination of discrete movement. Biol Cybern 63:257–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimba T (1984) An estimation of the center of gravity from force platform data. J Biomech 17:53–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperry RL (1988) Psychology's mentalist paradigm and the religionscience tension. Am Psychol 43:607–613

    Google Scholar 

  • Stelmach GE, Worringham CJ (1985) Sensorimotor deficits related to postural stability: implications for falling in the elderly. Clin Geriatr Med 1:679–694

    Google Scholar 

  • Stelmach GE, Populin L, Müller R (1990) Postural muscle onset ans voluntary movement in the elderly. Neurosci Lett 117:188–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale N, Bard C, Dadouchi F, Fleury M, LaRue J, Stelmach GE (1992) Posture and elderly persons: evidence for deficits in the central integrative mechanisms. In: Stelmach GE, Requin J (eds) Tutorials in motor behavior II. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 917–931

    Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale N, Bard C, Larue J, Fleury M (1993) On the cognitive penetrability of posture control. Exp Aging Res 19:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey MT, Kugler PN (1984) An ecological approach to perception and action. In: Whiting HTA (ed) Human motor action:Bernstein reassessed. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 373–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren WH, Young DS, Lee DN (1986) Visual control of step length during running over irregular terrain. J Exp Psychol 12:259–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter DA (1991) The biomechanics and motor control of human gait: normal, elderly and pathological, 2nd edn University of Waterloo, Waterloo

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter DA, Patla AE, Frank JS (1990) Assessment of balance control in humans. Med Prog Technol 16:31–51

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lajoie, Y., Teasdale, N., Bard, C. et al. Attentional demands for static and dynamic equilibrium. Exp Brain Res 97, 139–144 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00228824

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00228824

Key words

Navigation