Skip to main content
Log in

Trajectory control in targeted force impulses

I. Role of opposing muscles

  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The functional role of opposing muscles in the production of isometric force trajectories was studied in six adult subjects producing impulses and steps of elbow flexor force, with different rise times and amplitudes. Rapidly rising forces were invariably associated with an alternating pattern of EMG activity in agonist and antagonist muscles: an agonist burst (AGI) initiated the development of force in the desired direction while a reciprocal burst in the antagonist (ANT-R) led to the deceleration of the force trajectory prior to the peak force. The temporal pattern of agonist and antagonist activation was dependent on force rise time. Force trajectories with long rise times (> 200 ms) were entirely controlled by the agonist, and EMG activity closely followed the contours of the rising force trajectory. For rise times of about 120 to 200ms, agonist activation formed a discrete EMG burst, and force continued to rise during the subsequent silent period. For brief force rise times (< 120ms), reciprocal activation of the antagonist muscle occurred at about the time of the peak dF/dt. The integrated magnitude of AG1 was dependent on peak force but was independent of force rise time. AG1 duration varied directly with both peak force and force rise time. The integrated value of ANT-R varied as an inverse function of force rise time and was minimally influenced by peak force. ANT-R was present with the same magnitude and timing in both force impulses and steps when rise times were equal; therefore it did not serve to return force to baseline. Rather it served to truncate the rising force when very brief rise times were required, thus compensating for the low-pass filter properties of the agonist muscle. Subjects were able to voluntarily suppress ANT-R in rapidly accelerated force trajectories, indicating that the linkage between the commands controlling agonist and antagonist is not obligatory; however AG1 was then prolonged. Our findings emphasize that neuronal commands to opposing muscles acting at a joint must be adapted to constraints imposed by the properties of the neuromuscular plant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal GC, Gottlieb GL (1982) Mathematical modeling and simulation of the postural control loop, Part 1. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 8: 93–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Angel RW (1977) Antagonist muscle activity during rapid arm movements: central versus proprioceptive influences. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 40: 683–686

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawa P, Calancie B (1983) Repetitive doublets in human flexor carpi radialis muscle. J Physiol 339: 123–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein NA (1967) The coordination and regulation of movements. Pergamon, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown SHC, Cooke JD (1981) Amplitude- and instructiondependent modulation of movement-related electromyogram activity in humans. J Physiol 316: 97–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Büdingen HJ, Freund H-J (1976) The relationship between rate of rise of isometric tension and motor unit recruitment in a human forearm muscle. Eur J Physiol 362: 61–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke RE (1971) Control systems operating on spinal reflex mechanisms. Neurosci Res Prog Bull 9(1): 60–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke RE, Rudomin P, Zajac FE (1970) Catch property in single mammalian motor units. Science 168: 122–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke RE, Rudomin P, Zajac FE (1976) The effect of activation history on tension production by individual motor units. Brain Res 109: 515–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland WS (1979) Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J Am Stat Assoc 74: 829–836

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad B, Benecke R, Goehmann M (1983) Premovement silent period in fast movement initiation. Exp Brain Res 51: 310–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmedt JE, Godaux E (1977) Ballistic contractions in man: characteristic recruitment pattern of single motor units of the tibialis anterior muscle. J Physiol 264: 673–693

    Google Scholar 

  • Evarts EV (1974) Precentral and postcentral cortical activity in association with visually triggered movement. J Neurophysiol 37: 373–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Favilla M, Hening W, Ghez C (1985) Human tracking performance: parallel specification of amplitude and direction. Soc Neurosci Abstr 11: 72

    Google Scholar 

  • Favilla M, Hening W, Gordon J, Ghez C (1986) Preparatory set: independent specification of direction and size in the preparation of responses to a range of targets. Soc Neurosci Abstr 12: 972

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetz EE, Cheney PD (1980) Postspike facilitation of forelimb muscle activity by primate corticomotoneuronal cells. J Neurophysiol 44: 751–772

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghez C, Martin JH (1982) The control of rapid limb movement in the cat. III. Agonist-antagonist coupling. Exp Brain Res 45: 115–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon J (1985) Mechanisms contributing to accuracy in aimed force impulses of human subjects. Doctoral dissertation. Columbia University, Teachers College

  • Gordon J, Ghez C (1983) EMG patterns in antagonist muscles are coupled to response dynamics during isometric force adjustments in humans. Soc Neurosci Abstr 9: 1031

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon J, Ghez C (1984) EMG patterns in antagonist muscles during isometric contraction in man: relations to response dynamics. Exp Brain Res 55: 167–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon J, Hening W, Ghez C (1986) Abnormalities of trajectory control in dystonia. Neurol 36 (Suppl 1): 183

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon J, Ghez C (1987a) Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. II. Pulse height control. Exp Brain Res 67: 241–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon J, Ghez C (1987b) Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. III. Compensatory adjustments for initial errors. Exp Brain Res 67: 253–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Grillner S (1981) Control of locomotion in bipeds, tetrapods, and fish. In: Brooks VB (ed) Handbook of physiology, Sect 1. The nervous system, Vol 2. Motor control. American Physiological Society, Bethesda, pp 1179–1236

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurfinkel VS, Levik YS (1973) Dependence of contraction of the muscle on the sequence of stimulating pulses. Biophysics (USSR) 18: 116–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallett M, Shahani BT, Young RR (1975) EMG analysis of stereotyped voluntary movements in man. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 38: 1154–1162

    Google Scholar 

  • Hening W, Vicario D, Ghez C (1983) Choice reaction time conditions alter response dynamics in an isometric tracking task in humans. Soc Neurosci Abstr 9: 1031

    Google Scholar 

  • Hening W, Ghez C (1984) Processes underlying the initiation and specification of rapid isometric pulses in a human tracking task. Soc Neurosci Abstr 10: 801

    Google Scholar 

  • Henneman E, Somjen G, Carpenter DO (1965) Functional significance of cell size in motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 28: 560–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan N (1984) Adaptive control of mechanical impedance by coactivation of antagonist muscles. IEEE Trans on Automatic Control AC-29: 681–690

    Google Scholar 

  • Hultborn H (1976) Transmission in the pathway of reciprocal Ia inhibition to motoneurones and its control during the tonic stretch reflex. In: Homma S (ed) Understanding the stretch reflex. Progress in brain research, Vol 44. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 235–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Lestienne F (1979) Effects of inertial load and velocity on the braking process of voluntary limb movements. Exp Brain Res 35: 407–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden CD, Obeso JA, Rothwell JC (1983) The function of the antagonist muscle during fast limb movements in man. J Physiol 335: 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinck H-M, Benecke R, Meyer W, Hohne J, Conrad B (1984) Human ballistic finger flexion: uncoupling of the three-burst pattern. Exp Brain Res 55: 127–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller S, Scott PD (1977) The spinal locomotor generator. Exp Brain Res 30: 387–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner-Brown HS, Stein RB, Yemm R (1973) Changes in firing rate of human motor units during linearly changing voluntary contractions. J Physiol 230: 371–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge LD (1965) Modifications of neural output signals by muscles: a frequency response study. J Appl Physiol 20: 150–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge LD (1966) Signal-handling characteristics of load-moving skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol 210: 1178–1191

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanes JN, Jennings VA (1984) Centrally programmed patterns of muscle activity in voluntary motor behavior of humans. Exp Brain Res 54: 23–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinoda Y, Ghez C, Arnold A (1977) Spinal branching of rubrospinal axons in the cat. Exp Brain Res 30: 203–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinoda Y, Yokota J, Futami T (1981) Divergent projection of individual corticospinal axons to motoneurons of multiple muscles in monkey. Neurosci Lett 34: 11–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith AM (1981) The coactivation of antagonist muscles. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 59: 733–747

    Google Scholar 

  • Soechting JF, Roberts WJ (1975) Transfer characteristics between EMG activity und muscle tension under isometric conditions in man. J Physiol (Paris) 70: 779–793

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein RB, Parmiggiani F (1979) Optimal motor patterns for activating mammalian muscle. Brain Res 175: 372–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Struppler A, Burg D, Erbel F (1973) The unloading reflex under normal and pathological conditions in man. In: Desmedt JE (ed) New developments in electromyography and clinical neurophysiology, Vol 3. Karger, Basel, pp 603–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Terzuolo CA, Soechting JF, Ranish NA (1974) Studies on the control of some simple motor tasks. V. Changes in motor output following dorsal root section in the squirrel monkey. Brain Res 70: 521–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachholder K, Altenburger H (1926) Beiträge zur Physiologie der willkürlichen Bewegung. X. Einzelbewegungen. Pflügers Arch 214: 642–661

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadman WJ, Denier van der Gon JJ, Geuze RH, Mol CR (1979) Control of fast goal-directed arm movements. J Human Mov Stud 5: 3–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters P, Strick PL (1981) Influence of ‘strategy’ on muscle activity during ballistic movements. Brain Res 207: 189–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicka MM, Wiegner AW, Shahani BT (1985) Simulated ballistic movements. Soc Neurosci Abstr 11: 72

    Google Scholar 

  • Yabe K (1976) Premotion silent period in rapid voluntary movement. J Appl Physiol 41: 470–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajac FE, Young JL (1976) Discharge patterns of motor units during cat locomotion and their relation to muscle performance. In: Herman RM, Grillner S, Stein PSG, Stuart DG (eds) Neural control of locomotion. Plenum Press, New York, pp 789–793

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghez, C., Gordon, J. Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. Exp Brain Res 67, 225–240 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00248545

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00248545

Key words

Navigation