Summary
Field data show that in the cichlid fish Lamprologus brichardi conspecifics other than the reproducing pair help in brood care and territory maintenance. The expected degree of relatedness between helpers and the eggs or larvae they tend lies between 0.25 and 0.5, decreasing with the helper's age. This decrease might influence the point of time at which helpers depart. Five other endemic Lake Tanganyika cichlids showing rather similar helping behaviour are described.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brichard P (1978) Fishes of Lake Tanganyika. TFH, Neptune City
Fricke HW (1979) Mating system, resource defence and sex change in the anemonefish Amphiprion akallopisos. Z Tierpsychol 50:313–326
Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour I, II. J Theor Biol 7:1–52
Hrdy SB (1976) Care and exploitation of nonhuman primate infants by conspecifics other than the mother. Adv Study Behav 6:101–158
Kalas K (1975) Zur Ethologie von Lamprologus brichardi (Pisces; Cichlidae) Trewavas and Poll 1952 unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Sozialverhaltens. Diplomarbeit, 1. Zool Inst Univ Gießen
Kalas K (1976) Brutpflegehelfer und Polygamie beim afrikanischen Buntbarsch Lamprologus brichardi. Naturwissenschaften 63:94
Macdonald DW (1979) Helpers in fox society. Nature 282:69–71
McKaye KR, McKaye NM (1977) Communal care and kidnapping of young by parental cichlids. Evolution 31:674–681
Reyer HU (1980) Flexible helper structure as an ecological adaptation in the pied kingfisher (Ceryle rudis rudis L.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 6:219–227
Ribbink AJ, Marsh AC, Marsh B, Sharp BJ (1980) Parental behaviour and mixed broods among cichlid fish of Lake Malawi. S Afr J Zool 15:1–6
Ward JA, Wyman RA (1975) The cichlids of the Resplendent Isle. Oceans 8:42–47
Wilson EO (1975) Sociobiology: the new synthesis. Belknap Press of Harward University Press, Cambridge, MA
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taborsky, M., Limberger, D. Helpers in fish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 8, 143–145 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300826
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300826