Skip to main content
Log in

Identification of a sex pheromone from a rotifer

  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The first isolation and characterization of a sex pheromone from a zooplankter is reported. A 29 kdalton glycoprotein on the surface of females of the marine rotifer Brachionus plicatilis acts as a contact-mating pheromone. This glycoprotein (gp29) is glycosylated with oligosaccharides containing Nacetylglucosamine, mannose, and fucose residues, and these oligosaccharides are necessary for male recognition of females. Males detect this signal by contact chemoreception with receptors located in their corona. Binding of purified glycoprotein to male receptors reduces mating attempts by 93%. An antibody to the glycoprotein binds to females, reducing male mating attempts by 86%. When purified gp29 is bound to sepharose beads, it is sufficient to elicit male mating behavior. This glycoprotein is likely to play a key role in the evolution and maintenance of reproductive isolation in rotifers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aloia RC, Moretti RL (1973) Mating behavior and the ultrastructure of copulation in the rotifer Asplanchna brightwelli. Trans Am microsc Soc 90:371–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Atema J (1985) Chemoreception in the sea: adaptations of chemoreceptors and behavior to aquatic stimulus conditions. Symp Soc exp Biol 39:387–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Borowsky B (1991) Patterns of reproduction in some amphipod crustaceans and insights into the nature of their stimuli. In: Bauer RT, Martin JW (eds) Crustacean sexual biology. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 33–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Carde RT, Baker TC (1984) Sexual communication with pheromones. In: Bell WJ, Carde RT (eds) Chemical ecology of insects. Sunderland, Massachusetts, Sinauer Associates, pp 355–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr WES, Ache BW, Gleeson RA (1987) Chemoreceptors of crustaceans: similarities to receptors for neuroactive substance in internal tissues. Envir Hlth Perspectives 71:31–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement P, Wurdak EW, Amsellem J (1983) Behavior and ultrastructure of sensory organs in rotifers. Hydrobiologia 104: 89–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunham PJ (1978) Sex pheromones in Crustacea. Biol Rev 53: 555–583

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunham PJ (1988) Pheromones and behavior in Crustacea. In: Endocrinology of selected invertebrate types. New York, Alan R. Liss, pp 375–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert JJ (1963) Contact chemoreception, mating behavior, and sexual isolation in the rotifer genus Brachionus. J exp Biol 40: 625–641

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleeson RA (1991) Intrinsic factors mediating pheromone communication in the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus. In: Bauer RT, Martin JW (eds) Crustacean sexual biology, Columbia University Press, New York, pp 17–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Huyton PM, Langley PA, Carlson DA, Schwartz M (1980) Specificity of contact sex pheromones in tsetse flies, Glossina spp. Physiol Ent 5:253–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Katona SA (1973) Evidence for sex pheromones in planktonic copepods. Limnol Oceanogr 81:574–583

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowlton N (1993) Sibling species in the sea. A Rev Ecol Syst 24: 189–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubota T, Tokoroyama T, Tsukuda Y, Koiama H, Miyake A (1973) Isolation and structure determination of blepharismin, a conjugation initiating gamone in the ciliate Blepharisma. Science, NY 179:400–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature, Lond 227: 680–685

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson P, Dodson S (1993) Chemical communication in planktonic animals. Arch Hydrobiol 129:129–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Liener IE, Sharon N, Goldstein IJ (1986) The lectins. New York, Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Luporiri P, Micelli C (1986) Mating pheromones. In: Gall JG (ed) The molecular biology of ciliated Protozoa, New York, Academic Press, pp 263–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyake A, Beyer J (1974) Blepharmone: a conjugation-inducing glycoprotein in the ciliate Blepharisma. Science, NY 185: 621–623

    Google Scholar 

  • Osawa T, Tsuji T (1987) Fractionation and structural assessment of oligosaccharides and glycopeptides by use of immobilized lectins. A Rev Biochem 56:21–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Palumbi SR (1992) Marine speciation on a small planet. Trends Ecol Evol 7:114–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Rence B, Loher W (1977) Contact chemoreceptive sex recognition in the male cricket, Teleogryllus commodus. Physiol Ent 2:225–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Rico-Martinez R, Snell TW (1995) Mating behavior and mate recognition pheromone blocking of male receptors in Brachionus plicatilis Muller (Rotifera). Hydrobiologia (in press)

  • Schlein, Y. Galun R, Ben-Eliahu MN (1981) Abstinons. Male-produced deterents of mating in flies. J chem Ecol 7:285–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Segers H (1995) Nomenclatural consequences of some recent studies on Brachionus plicatilis (Rotifera, Brachionidae). Hydrobiologia (in press)

  • Sharon N, Lis H (1989a) Lectins as cell recognition molecules. Science, NY 246:227–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharon N, Lis H (1989b) Lectins. New York, Chapman & Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Snell TW (1989) Systematics, reproductive isolation and species boundaries in monogonont rotifers. Hydrobiologia 186/187:299–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Snell TW, Carmona MJ (1995) Surface glycoproteins in copepods: potential signals for mate recognition. Hydrobiologia (in press)

  • Snell TW, Childress MJ, Winkler BC (1988) Characteristics of the mate recognition factor in the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. Comp Biochem Physiol 89A (3):481–485

    Google Scholar 

  • Snell TW, Garman BL (1986) Encounter probabilities between male and female rotifers. J exp mar Biol Ecol 97:221–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Snell TW, Hawkinson CA (1983) Behavioral reproductive isolation among populations of the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. Evolution 37:1294–1305

    Google Scholar 

  • Snell TW, Hoff FH (1987) Fertilization and male fertility in the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. Hydrobiologia 147:329–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Snell TW, Morris PD (1993) Sexual communication in copepods and rotifers. Hydrobiologia 255/256:109–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Snell TW, Morris PD, Cecchine GA (1993) Localization of the mate recognition pheromone in Brachionus plicatilis. (O.F. Müller) (Rotifera) by fluorescent labeling with lectins. J exp mar Biol Ecol 165:225–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Snell TW, Nacionales MA (1990) Sex pheromone communication in Brachionus plicatilis (Rotifera). Comp Biochem Physiol 97A: 211–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanhope MJ, Connelly MM, Hartwick B (1992) Evolution of a crustacean chemical communication channel: behavioral and ecological genetic evidence for a habitat-modified, race-specific pheromone. J chem Ecol 18:1871–1887

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace RL, Snell TW (1991) Rotifera. In: Thorp JH, Covich AP (eds) Ecology and classification of North American freshwater invertebrates. New York, Academic Press, pp 187–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiese L (1965) On sexual agglutination and mating type substances (gamones) in isogamous heterophallic Chlamydamondes. I. Evidence of the identity of the gamone with the surface components responsible for sexual flagellar content. J Phycol 1:46–54

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by N. H. Marcus, Tallahassee

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Snell, T.W., Rico-Martinez, R., Kelly, L.N. et al. Identification of a sex pheromone from a rotifer. Marine Biology 123, 347–353 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00353626

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00353626

Keywords

Navigation