Skip to main content
Log in

Myofibroblasts and myoepithelial cells in human breast carcinoma

An ultrastructural study

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Ultrastructural studies of 11 human breast carcinomata revealed that most stromal cells could be arranged in a cell spectrum from fibroblasts, with abundant rough endoplasmic reticulum, to myofibroblasts. In 4 out of 11 cases, myoepithelial cells were observed in the parenchyma at the periphery of some carcinomatous duct-like structures or carcinoma cell nests. The distinction between myofibroblasts and myoepithelial cells was usually easy from their respective locations. Their ultrastructural features were summarized as follows. Myofibroblasts: (1) abundance of rough ER and other cytoplasmic organelles; (2) bundles of microfilaments, 50–70 Å in diameter and associated dense bodies. Myoepithelial cells: (1) bundles of microfilaments 50–70 Å in diameter and associated dense bodies (a common feature); (2) dense bundles of tonofilaments, 80–100 Å in diameter; (3) typical desmosomes which connected them with adjacent myoepithelial or carcinoma cells. Myofibroblasts were occasionally located closely contiguous with carcinoma cells, giving an appearance resembling myoepithelial cells. Even in these instances a distinction between myofibroblasts and myoepithelial cells was possible, since myoepithelial cells had dense bundles of tonofilaments and typical desmosomes, which were not observed in myofibroblasts. No cell types intermediate between myofibroblasts and myoepithelial cells were detected. We could not decide whether myoepithelial cells were neoplastic or not despite the facts that they showed obscured polarity and had partially or completely lost their basal lamina. We conclude that fibroblasts, myofibroblasts and probably some, if not all, smooth muscle cells belong to the same cell system. Myofibroblasts in our material are derived from fibroblasts, while myoepithelial cells are epithelial in origin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed, A.: The myoepithelium in human breast carcinoma. J. Pathol. 113, 129–135 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, A.: Atlas of the ultrastructure of human breast diseases, pp. 88–89. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Co. 1978

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhawan, J., Bacchetta, C., Joris, I., Majno, G.: A myofibroblastic tumor. Infantile digital fibroma (Recurrent digital fibrous tumor of childhood). Am. J. Pathol. 94, 19–36 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, W., Fawcett, D.W.: A textbook of histology, 10th edition, pp. 171–172. Philadelphia: Saunders Co. 1975

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, M., Spudich, J.A.: Nonmuscle contractile proteins: The role of actin and myosin in cell motility and shape determination. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 46, 797–822 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, E.R.: Ultrastructure of the human breast and its disorders. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 66, 291–375 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabbiani, G., Majno, G.: Dupuytren's contracture: fibroblast contraction? An ultrastructural study. Am. J. Pathol. 66, 131–146 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabbiani, G., Hirschel, B.J., Ryan, G.B., Statkov, P.R., Majno, G.: Granulation tissue as a contractile organ. A study of structure and function. J. Exp. Med. 135, 719–734 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg, V.E., Goldenberg, N.S., Sommers, S.C.: Comparative ultrastructure of atypical ductal hyperplasia, intraductal carcinoma, and infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast. Cancer 24, 1152–1169 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, R.D.: The use of heavy meromyosin binding as an ultrastructural cytochemical method for localizing and determining the possible functions of actin-like microfilaments in nonmuscle cells. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 23, 529–542 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, V.E., Miller, J., Jao, W.: Ultrastructure of medullary, intraductal, tubular and adenocystic breast carcinomas. Comparative patterns of myoepithelial differentiation and basal lamina deposition. Am. J. Pathol. 78, 401–416 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamperl, H.: The myothelia (myoepithelial cells). Normal state; regressive changes; hyperplasia; tumor. Curr. Top. Pathol. 53, 161–220 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Majno, G., Gabbiani, G., Hirschel, B.J. Ryan, G.B., Statkov, P.R.: Contraction of granulation tissue in vitro: Similarity to smooth muscle. Science 173, 548–550 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, M.J., Pelleg, A., Sperelakis, N.: Electrophysiological recordings from spontaneously contracting reaggregates of cultured smooth muscle cells from guinea pig vas deferens. J. Cell Biol. 80, 539–552 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • McNutt, N.S., Weinstein, R.S.: Membrane ultrastructure at mammalian intercellular junctions. Progr. Biphys. Mol. Biol. 26, 47–101 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Murad, T.M., Haam, E.: Ultrastructure of myoepithelial cells in human mammary gland tumors. Cancer 21, 1137–1149 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohtani, H., Sasano, N.: Myofibroblasts in human breast carcinoma. An ultrastructure study. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 128, 123–137 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozzello, L.: Epithelial-stromal junction of normal and dysplastic mammary glands. Cancer 25, 586–600 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozzello, L.: Ultrastructure of the human mammary gland. Pathol. Ann. 6, 1–59 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, R., Klebanoff, S.J.: The smooth muscle cell. I. In vivo synthesis of connective tissue proteins. J. Cell Biol. 50, 159–171 (1971a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, R.: The smooth muscle cell. II. Growth of smooth muscle in culture and formation of elastic fibers. J. Cell Biol. 50, 172–186 (1971b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, G.B., Cliff, W.J., Gabbiani, G., Irlé, C., Statkov, P.R., Majno, G.: Myofibroblasts in an avascular fibrous tissue. Lab. Invest. 29, 197–206 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, G.B., Cliff, W.J., Gabbiani, G., Irlé, C., Montandon, D. Statkov, P.R., Majno, G.: Myofibroblasts in human granulation tissue. Hum. Pathol. 5, 55–67 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer, A., Bässler, R.: Vergleichende elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen am Drüsenepithel und am sog. lobulären Carcinom der Mamma. Virchows Arch. Abt. A Path. Anat. 346, 269–286 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirling J.W., Chandler, J.A.: The fine structure of the normal, resting terminal ductal-lobular unit of the female breast. Virchows Arch. A Path. Anat. and Histol. 372, 205–226 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, J.A., Recher, L., Jernstrom, P.H., Whitescarver, J.: Morphological investigation of human breast cancer. J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 40, 195–223 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, M., Weiss, M., Marx, A.J.: Ultrastructure of the human mammary ductule. Cancer 23, 958–978 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasudev, K.S., Harris, M.: A sarcoma of myofibroblasts. An ultrastructural study. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 102, 185–188 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessells, N.K., Spooner, B.S., Ash, J.F., Bradley, M.O., Luduena, M.A., Taylor, E.L., Wrenn, J.T., Yamada, K.M.: Microfilaments in cellular and developmental processes. Science 171, 135–143 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirman, J.A.: Nodular fasciitis, A lesion of myofibroblast. An ultrastructural study. Cancer 38, 2378–2389 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported in part by Public Health Service Contract No. 1CP23213 from National Cancer Institute, U.S.A. and by a Grant-in-Aid for Cancer Research No. 51-7 from the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Japan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ohtani, H., Sasano, N. Myofibroblasts and myoepithelial cells in human breast carcinoma. Virchows Arch. A Path. Anat. and Histol. 385, 247–261 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00432535

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00432535

Key words

Navigation