Abstract
The aim of this study was to illustrate the influence of different levels of the fulcrum (the axis of sagittal rotation) on measured trunk flexion and extension strength and compare force and torque as a unit of measure. The isometric trunk strength was measured in 16 healthy female subjects. The dynamometer was kept at the shoulder level and the moment arm was lengthened step by step by moving the fulcrum caudally from the level of the posterior superior iliac spine to the level of the gluteal fold. The moment of force (torque) increased from 117.0 to 208.5 N · m in flexion and from 182.2 to 292.5 N · m in extension,P < 0.0001. An attempt to quantify this change was made. Paradoxically, the measured force remained at a constant level (in flexion) or slightly decreased (in extension). We concluded that torque as a measure of trunk flexion and extension strength is highly dependent on the level of the rotation axis and force appears to be less sensitive for variations with the height of the fulcrum. We would suggest that the observed increase in torque is physiological and reflects to what extent hip flexor or extensor muscles are recruited. The force, on the other hand, may better characterize a person's capability to perform functional tasks. Force and torque should strictly be distinguished from one another.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Addison R, Schultz A (1980) Trunk strengths in patients seeking hospitalization for chronic low-back disorders. Spine 5:539–544
Alston W, Carlson KE, Feldman DJ, Grimm Z, Gerontinos E (1966) A quantitative study of muscle factors in the chronic back syndrome. J Am Geriatr Soc 14:1041–1047
Altman DG, Gardner MJ (1989) Calculating confidence intervals for means and their differences. In: Gardner MJ, Altman DG (eds) Statistics with confidence. British Medical Journal, London, pp 21–27
Biering-Sørensen F (1984) Physical measurements as risk indicators for low-back trouble over a one-year period. Spine 9:106–119
Davidson M, Toporek J (1990) Univariate and multivariate analysis of variance and covariance, including repeated measures. In: Dixon WJ, Brown MB, Engelman L, Jennrich RI (eds) BMDP Statistical software manual, vol 2. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 1169–1170
Delitto A, Crandell CE, Rose SJ (1989) Peak torque-to-body weight ratios in the trunk: a critical analysis. Phys Ther 69:138–143
Graves JE, Pollock ML, Carpenter DM, Leggett SH, Jones A, MacMillan M, Fulton M (1990) Quantitative assessment of full range-of-motion isometric lumbar extension strength. Spine 15:289–294
Hasue M, Fujiwara M, Kikuchi S (1980) A new method of quantitative measurement of abdominal and back muscle strength. Spine 5:143–148
Holmström E, Moritz U, Andersson M (1992) Trunk muscle strength and back muscle endurance in construction workers with and without low back disorders. Scand J Rehabil Med 24:3–10
Khalil TM, Asfour SS, Martinez LM, Waly SM, Rosomoff RS, Rosomoff HL (1992) Stretching in the rehabilitation of lowback pain patients. Spine 17:311–317
Klein AB, Snyder-Mackler L, Roy SH, DeLuca CJ (1991) Comparison of spinal mobility and isometric trunk extensor forces with electromyographic spectral analysis in identifying low back pain. Phys Ther 71:445–454
Langrana NA, Lee CK, Alexander H, Mayott CW (1984) Quantitative assessment of back strength using isokinetic testing. Spine 9:287–290
Leino P, Aro S, Hasan J (1987) Trunk muscle function and low back disorders: a ten-year follow-up study. J Chron Dis 40:289–296
Mayer L, Greenberg BB (1942) Measurements of the strength of trunk muscles. J Bone Joint Surg 24:842–856
Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ (1988) Objective measurement of functional task performance. In: Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ (eds) Functional restoration for spinal disorders: the sports medicine approach. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 162–182
Mayer TG, Smith SS, Keeley J, Mooney V (1985) Quantification of lumbar function 2. Sagittal plane trunk strength in chronic low-back pain patients. Spine 10:765–772
McNeill T, Warwick D, Andersson G, Schultz A (1980) Trunk strengths in attempted flexion, extension, and lateral bending in healthy subjects and patients with low-back disorders. Spine 5:529–538
Mooney V (1987) Where is the pain coming from? Spine 12:754–759
Nachemson A, Lindh M (1969) Measurement of abdominal and back muscle strength with and without low back spain. Scand J Rehabil Med 1:60–65
Nicolaisen T, Jørgensen K (1985) Trunk strength, back muscle endurance and low back trouble. Scand J Rehabil Med 17:121–127
Nordgren B, Schéle R, Linroth K (1980) Evaluation and prediction of back pain during military field service. Scand J Rehabil Med 12:1–8
Nordin M, Kahanovitz N, Verderame R, Parnianpour M, Yabut S, Viola K, Greenidge N, Mulvihill M (1987) Normal trunk muscle strength and endurance in women and the effect of exercises and electrical stimulation 1. Normal endurance and trunk muscle strength in 101 women. Spine 12:105–111
Rasch PJ, Burke RK (1978) The body as a lever system. Kinesiology and applied anatomy. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 127–141
Sipilä S, Viitasalo J, Era P, Suominen H (1991) Muscle strength in male athletes aged 70–81 years and a population sample. Eur J Appl Physiol 63:399–403
Smidt G, Herring T, Amundsen L, Rogers M, Russell A, Lehmann T (1983) Assessment of abdominal and back extensor function. A quantitative approach and results for chronic lowback patients. Spine 8:211–219
Smith SS, Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ, Becker T (1985) Quantification of lumbar function 1. Isometric and multispeed isokinetic trunk strength measures in sagittal and axial planes in normal subjects. Spine 10:757–764
Stokes IAF, Rush S, Moffroid M, Johnson GB, Haugh LD (1987) Trunk extensor EMG-torque relationship. Spine 12:770–776
Stokes IAF, Gookin DM, Reid S, Hazard RG (1990) Effects of axis placement on measurement of isokinetic flexion and extension torque in the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disorders 3:114–118
Thorstensson A, Arvidson Å (1982) Trunk muscle strength and low back pain. Scand J Rehabil Med 14:69–75
Thorstensson A, Nilsson J (1982) Trunk muscle strength during constant velocity movements. Scand J Rehabil Med 14:61–68
Viitasalo JT, Era P, Leskinen A-L, Heikkinen E (1985) Muscular strength profiles and anthropometry in random samples of men aged 31–35, 51–55 and 71–75 years. Ergonomics 28:1563–1574
Viljanen T, Viitasalo JT, Kujala UM (1991) Strength characteristics of a healthy urban adult population. Eur J Appl Physiol 63:43–47
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rantanen, P., Airaksinen, O. & Penttinen, E. Paradoxical variation of strength determinants with different rotation axes in trunk flexion and extension strength tests. Europ. J. Appl. Physiol. 68, 322–326 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00571451
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00571451