Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The longitudinal use of the Global Assessment Scale in multiple-rater situations

  • Articles
  • Published:
Community Mental Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Global Assessment Scale was used by multiple clinicians to rate 108 chronically mentally ill outpatients for 18 months. With prior training, high interrater reliability was obtained. Analysis suggests that fluctuations in patients' scores were not attributable to measurement error due to the sequential ratings of multiple clinicians. Moreover, GAS means were inversely correlated with decompensations, over the study period. Results indicate that the DMS-III-R recommended use, of the GAS in multiple-rater outpatient facilities can be both reliable and clinically useful when supported by thorough staff training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1987)Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd edition-revised. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartko, JJ. and Carpenter, WT Jr. (1976) On the methods and theory of reliability.J. Nerv Ment Dis. 163:307–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. and Friedman, MJ. (1983) Nine standardized scales for evaluating treatment outcomes in a mental health clinic.J Clin Psych 39:939–950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endicott, J., Spitzer, RL, Fleiss, JL, Cohen J. (1976) The Global Assessment Scale: a procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance.Arch Gen Psych. 33:766–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luborsky I., Bachrach H. (1974) Factors influencing clinician's judgments of mental health: eighteen experiences with the Health-Sickness Rating Scale.Arch Gen Psych. 31:292–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. (1978)Psychometric, Theory, 2nd edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plakun, EM., Muller, JP., and Burkhardt, PE. (1987) The significance of borderline and schizotypal overlap.Hillside J Clin Psych. 9:47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinsley, HEA., and Weiss, DJ. (1975) Interrater reliability and agreement of subjective judgments.J Couns Psych 22:358–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JBW. (1986) DSM-III-R: what's all the fuss about?Hosp Comm Psych. 37:549–550.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, 77030, 713-798-5634, Houston, Texas

    Rosalind J. Dworkin Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Rosalind J. Dworkin Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lois C. Friedman Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ruth L. Telschow M.A.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kim D. Grant Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. H. Steven Moffic M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Victoria J. Sloan Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dworkin, R.J., Friedman, L.C., Telschow, R.L. et al. The longitudinal use of the Global Assessment Scale in multiple-rater situations. Community Ment Health J 26, 335–344 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00752724

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00752724

Keywords

Search

Navigation