Skip to main content
Log in

Toward an axiology for medicine a response to Kazem Sadegh-zadeh

  • Published:
Metamedicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Agich, G. J., ‘The foundation of medical ethics’,Metamedicine 2, 1981, 31–34.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Engelhardt, H. T., Jr., ‘The concepts of health and disease’ in H. T. Engelhardt and S. F. Spicker (eds.),Evaluation and Explanation in the Biomedical Sciences, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1975, pp. 125–142.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Frankena, W., ‘Value and valuation’, in Paul Edwards (ed.)The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, MacMillan and the Free Press, New York, 1967, Vol. 8, pp. 229–232.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hartman, R. S.,The Structure of Value, Southern Illinois University Press Carbondale, Ill., 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ingelfinger, F. J., ‘Arrogance’,The New England Journal of Medicine 303, 1980, 1507–1511.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lepley, R. (ed.),The Language of Value, Columbia University Press, New York, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  7. McCullough, L. B., ‘Pluralism, philosophies of medicine and the varieties of medical ethics: A commentary on Thomasma and Pellegrino’,Metamedicine 2, 1981, 13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Moskop, J. C., ‘Medicine, ethics, and the living body: A response to Thomasma and Pellegrino’,Metamedicine,2, 1981, 19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pellegrino, E. D., ‘The anatomy of clinical judgment’, in H. T. Engelhardt, Jr., S. F. Spicker, and B. Towers (eds.)Clinical Judgment: A Critical Appraisal, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1979, pp. 169–194.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pellegrino, E. D. and Thomasma, D. C.,A Philosophical Basis of Medical Practice: Towards a Philosophy and Ethics of the Healing Profession, Oxford University Press, New York, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pellegrino, E. D. and Thomasma, D. C., ‘Response to our commentators’,Metamedicine 2, 1981, 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pellegrino, E. D. and Thomasma, D. C., ‘Medicine as a science of action: A response to Peter Hucklenbroich’,Metamedicine 2, 1981, 235–243.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sadegh-zadeh, K., ‘Normative systems and medical metaethics. Part 1: Value kinematics, health, and disease’,Metamedicine 2, 1981 75–119.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Thomas, L.,Lives of a Cell, Viking Press, New York, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thomasma, D. C., ‘Training in medical ethics: An ethical workup’,Forum on Medicine 1, 1978, 30–33.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thomasma, D. C. and Pellegrino, E. D., ‘Philosophy of medicine as the source for medical ethics’,Metamedicine 2, 1981, 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wear, S., ‘Nuancing the healer's art—The epistemology of patient competence’,Metamedicine 2, 1981 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Whitbeck, C., ‘On the aims of medicine: Comments on, ‘Philosophy of medicine as the source for medical ethics’’Metamedicine 2, 1981, 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pellegrino, E.D., Thomasma, D.C. Toward an axiology for medicine a response to Kazem Sadegh-zadeh. Metamedicine 2, 331–342 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00882079

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00882079

Navigation