Abstract
A survey of 51 species fromNicotiana subgg.Tabacum, Rustica andPetunioides has shown that evolution was accompanied by a five-fold variation in nuclear DNA amounts. This variation, however, was not directly correlated with the changes in chromosome number. Drastic rearrangement of karyotypes is characteristic for the evolution ofNicotiana spp. Significant gain or loss in nuclear DNA has often accompanied such changes, but DNA variation has also occurred without significant changes in karyotype arrangements.—The distribution of nuclear DNA is discontinuous inNicotiana, species cluster into DNA groups with consistently regular increments in the mean DNA amounts. The discontinuities are viewed as “steady states” in terms of genomic balance and biological fitness.—Changes in the amount of nuclear DNA and in the heterochromatin are compared with the morphological, chromosomal and adaptive changes which accompanied speciation in 14 subgeneric sections. The evolutionary significance of DNA variation is discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ainsworth, C. C., Parker, J. S., Horton, D. M., 1983: Chromosome variation and evolution inScilla autumnalis. — InBrandham, P. E., Bennet, M. D., (Eds.): Kew Chromosome Conference II, pp. 261–268. — London: George Allen & Unwin.
Bennett, M. D., Smith, J. B., 1976: Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms. — Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., Ser. B,274, 227–274.
Cavallier-Smith, T., 1985: Eucaryotic gene numbers, non coding DNA and genome size. — InCavallier-Smith, T., (Ed.): The Evolution of Genome Size, pp. 69–103. — London: John Wiley.
Doolittle, W. F., Sapienza, C., 1980: Selfish genes, the phenotype paradigm and genome evolution. — Nature284, 601–603.
Dover, G. A., 1980: Ignorant DNA?. — Nature285, 618–620.
Flavell, R. B., Rimpau, J., Smith, D. B., 1977: Repeated sequence DNA relationships in four cereal genomes. — Chromosoma63, 205–222.
Gerstel, D. U., 1960: Segregation in new allopolyploids ofNicotiana. I. Comparison of 6 x (N. tabacum xN. tomentosiformis) and 6 x (N. tabacum xN. otophora). — Genetics45, 1723–1734.
—, 1966: Evolutionary problems in some polyploid crop plants. — Hereditas, Suppl.2, 481–604.
Goodspeed, T. H., 1954: The genusNicotiana. — Chronica Botanica 536 pp. — Massachusetts: Waltham.
Gray, J. C., King, S. D., Wildham, S. G., Sheen, S. J., 1974: Origin ofNicotiana tabacum L. detected by polypeptide composition of fraction I protein. — Nature252, 226–227.
Greilhuber, J., Speta, F., 1985: Geographical variation of genome size at low taxonomic levels inScilla bifolia alliance (Hyacinthaceae). — Flora176, 431–438.
Hutchinson, J., Rees, H., Seal, A. G., 1979: An assay of the activity of supplementary DNA inLolium. — Heredity43, 411–421.
—, 1980: Constraints upon the composition of the supplementary DNA inLolium. — Chromosoma78, 137–145.
Kenton, A., 1983: Qualitative and quantitative chromosome changes in the evolution ofGibasis. — InBrandtham, P. E., Bennet, M. D., (Eds.): Kew Chromosome Conference II, pp. 273–282. — London: George Allen & Unwin.
Laurie, D. A., Bennett, M. D., 1985: Nuclear DNA content in the generaZea andSorghum. Intergeneric interspecific and intraspecific variation. — Heredity55, 307–313.
Martin, P. G., Shanks, R., 1966: DoesVicia faba have multistranded chromosomes?. — Nature211, 658.
McLeish, J., Sunderland, N., 1961: Measurement of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) in higher plants by feulgen photometry. — Exp. Cell Res.24, 527–540.
Narayan, R. K. J., 1982: Discontinuous DNA variation in the evolution of plant species. The genusLathyrus. — Evolution36, 877–891.
—, 1985: Discontinuous DNA variation in the evolution of plant species. — J. Genet.64, 101–109.
—, 1983: DNA distribution in chromosomes ofLathyrus species. — Genetica61, 47–53.
—, 1974: DNA, heterochromatin and phylogeny ofNicotiana amphidiploids. — Chromosoma47, 75–83.
—, 1976: Nuclear DNA variation inLathyrus. — Chromosoma54, 141–154.
Orgel, L. E., Crick, F. H. C., 1980: Selfish DNA—the ultimate parasite. — Nature284, 604–607.
Rayburn, A. L., Price, H. J., Smith, J. D., Gold, J. R., 1985: C-band heterochromatin and DNA content inZ. mays. — Amer. J. Bot.72, 1610–1617.
Rothfels, K. E., Sexsmith, M. M., Heimburger, M., Krause, M. O., 1966: Chromosome size and DNA content of species ofAnemona L. and related genera. — Chromosoma20, 54–74.
Sheen, S. J., 1972: Izozymic evidence bearing on the origin ofN. tabacum. — Evolution26, 143–154.
Simpson, G. G., 1953: Major Features of Evolution. — New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
Smith, H. H., 1968: Recent cytogenetic studies in the genusNicotiana. — Adv. in Genetics14, 1–54.
—, 1979: The genus as a genetic resource. — InDurbin, R. D., (Ed.):Nicotiana procedures for experimental use. — USDA Techn. Bull. No.1586, 1–17.
Sparrow, A. H., Nauman, A. F., 1973: Evolutionary changes in chromosome size and DNA content in grasses. — Brookhaven Symp. Biol.25, 367–389.
Teoh, S. B., Rees, H., 1976: Nuclear DNA amounts in populations ofPicea andPinus species. — Heredity36, 123–137.
Van't Hof, J., 1965: Relationships between mitotic cycle duration, S period duration and the average rate of DNA synthesis in the root meristem cells of several plants. — Exp. Cell Res.39, 48–58.
Zimmerman, J. L., Goldberg, R. B., 1977: DNA sequence organisation in the genome ofNicotiana tabacum. — Chromosoma59, 227–252.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Narayan, R.K.J. Nuclear DNA changes, genome differentiation and evolution inNicotiana (Solanaceae). Pl Syst Evol 157, 161–180 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00936195
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00936195