Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Molecular phylogeny and phylogeography ofLupinus (Leguminosae) inferred from nucleotide sequences of therbcL gene and ITS 1 + 2 regions of rDNA

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Total DNA was extracted from 55 species of theLeguminosae (including 29 species ofLupinus). The chloroplast generbcL and the ITS 1 + 2 regions of nuclear RNA genes were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequenced directly. The sequences obtained were evaluated with character state (Maximum Parsimony) and distance methods (Neighbour Joining). Phylogenetic trees obtained with both data sets and methods are mostly congruent.Genisteae andCrotalarieae are sister groups and share ancestry with theThermopsideae/Podalyrieae. The genusLupinus, which forms a monophyletic clade within theGenisteae, shows a distinct Old-New World disjunction and appears to be divided into several more or less distinct groups: (1) The species from the eastern part of South America. (2) The homogeneous rough-seeded group (Scabrispermae) of the Old World species which is well distinguished from the smooth-seeded group (Malacospermae). (3) Within the rather heterogeneous smooth-seeded lupins a smaller subgroup withL. angustifolius, L. hispanicus andL. luteus is recognized. (4) Also separated are North American lupins and South American species with a western distribution. Genetic distances imply that the genusLupinus evolved during the last 12–14 million years, ruling out the hypothesis that the present Old-New World disjunction can be interpreted as a result of the continental drift. The genetic data suggest an origin in the Old World and an independant colonisation of the Eastern parts of South America as opposed to North America and the Western parts of South America.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agardh, C., 1835: Synopsis generis Lupini. — Lund: Berling.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaral, Franco, J. Do, Pinto Da Silva, A. R., 1968:Lupinus L. — InTutin, T. G., Heywood, V. H., Burges, N. A., Moore, D. M., Valentine, D. H., Walters, S. M., Webb, D. A., (Eds): Flora Europaea,2, pp. 105–106. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badr, A., Martin, W., Jensen, U., 1994: Chloroplast restriction site polymorphism inGenisteae (Leguminosae) suggests a common origin for European and American lupines. — Pl. Syst. Evol.193: 95–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, D., 1994:RbcL and seed-plant phylogeny. — TREE9: 39–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, G., 1865:Leguminosae. — InBentham, G., Hooker, J. D., (Eds): Genera plantarum,1(2), pp. 434–600. — London: Reeve.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisby, F. A., 1981:Genisteae (Adans.)Benth. — InPolhill, R. M., Raven, P. H., (Eds): Advances in legume systematics,1, pp. 409–425. — Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruneau, A., Doyle, J. J., 1993: Phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast DNA restriction site characters inErythrina L. (Phaseoleae:Leguminosae). — Syst. Bot.18: 229–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1990: A chloroplast DNA inversion as a subtrial character in thePhaseoleae (Leguminosae). — Syst. Bot.15: 378–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1995: Phylogenetic relationship inPhaseoleae: evidence from chloroplast DNA restriction site characters. — InCrisp, M., Doyle, J. J., (Eds): Advances in legume systematics,7, pp. 309–330. — Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkart, A., 1952: Las leguminosas Argentinas silvestres y cultivadas. — Buenos Aires: Acme Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candolle, A. P., De, 1825–1827: Prodromus systematics naturalis,2. — Paris: Treuttel & Würtz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carstairs, S. A., Buirchell, B. J., Cowling, W. A., 1992: Chromosome number, size and interspecific crossing ability of three Old World lupins,Lupinus princei Harms,L. atlanticus Gladstones andL. digitatus Forskål, and implications for cyto-systematic relationships among the rough-seeded lupins. — J. Roy. Soc. Western Australia75: 83–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, M. W., & al., 1993: An analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid generbcL. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.80: 528–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, M. T., 1993: Chloroplast gene sequences and the study of plant evolution. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA90: 363–367.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cranmer, M. F., Turner, B. L., 1967: Systematic significance of lupine alkaloids with particular reference toBaptisia (Leguminosae). — Evolution21: 508–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisp, M. D., Doyle, J. J., 1995: Advances in legume systematics.7. — Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cristofolini, G., 1987: Serological relationships amongSophoreae, Thermopsideae andGenisteae (Fabaceae). — Bot. J. Linn. Soc.94: 421–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1989: A serological contribution to the systematics of the genusLupinus (Fabaceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.166: 265–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1977: Serological systematics of the tribeGenisteae (Fabaceae). — Taxon26: 43–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1984: Origin and diversification ofGenisteae (Fabaceae): a serosystematic purview. — Webbia38: 105–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado-Salinas, A., Bruneau, A., Doyle, J. J., 1993: Chloroplast DNA phylogenetic studies in the New WorldPhaseolinae (Leguminosae:Papilionoideae:Phaseoleae). — Syst. Bot.18: 6–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donoghue, M. J., 1994: Progress and prospects in reconstructing plant phylogeny. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.81: 405–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J. J., 1993: DNA, phylogeny and the flowering of plant systematics. — BioScience43: 380–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1994: Phylogeny of the legume family: an approach to understanding the origins of nodulation. — Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst.25: 325–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1995: DNA data and legume phylogeny: a progress report. — InCrisp, M., Doyle, J. J., (Eds): Advances in legume systematics,7, pp. 11–13. — Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J. L., 1990: Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. — Focus12: 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1993: Chloroplast DNA phylogeny of the papilionoid legume tribePhaseoleae. — Syst. Bot.18: 309–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1992: Contributions of molecular data to papilionoid legume systematics. — InSoltis, P. S., Soltis, D. E., Doyle, J. J., (Eds): Molecular systematics of plants, pp. 223–251. — New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, D. B., 1971: A case of long range dispersal and “rapid speciation” inLupinus. — Trans. Missouri Acad. Sci.5: 26–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1984: Genetic resources: cytotaxonomy and distribution of new world lupin species. — In Proceedings of the Third International Lupin Conference, pp. 68–85. — La Rochelle: International Lupin Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1966: The lupines of Canada and Alaska. — Canada Department of Agriculture, Monograph2. — Ottawa: Queen's Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faugeras, G., Paris, R., 1971: Nouvelles recherches phytochimiques sur les Papilionacées-Génistées d'Europe. — Boissiera19: 201–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J., 1988: Phylogenies from molecular sequences: inference and reliability. — Annual Rev. Genet.22: 521–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gams, H., 1923–1924:Leguminosae. — InHegi, G., (Ed.): Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa4(3), pp. 1113–1644. — Wien: Pichler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, P. E., 1966: A revision of the genusGenista L. — Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh27: 11–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladstones, J. S., 1974: Lupins of the Mediterranean region and Africa. — Techn. Bull. Dept. Agric. Western Australia26: 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldblatt, P., 1981: Cytology and the phylogeny ofLeguminosae. — InPolhill, R. M., Raven, P. H., (Eds): Advances in legume systematics,1, pp. 427–463. — Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, C. M. R., Gottlieb, O. R., Gottileb, R. G., Salatino A., 1981: Phytochemistry in perspective: chemosystematics of thePapilionoideae. — InPolhill, R. M., Raven, P. H., (Eds): Advances in legume systematics,1, pp. 409–425. — Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, R., 1984: First Reinhold von Sengbusch memorial lecture: Lupins in the Old and New world — a biological-cultural coevolution. — In: Proceedings of the Third International Lupin Conference, pp. 244–277. — Rochelle: International Lupin Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamby, R. K., Zimmer, E. A., 1992: Ribosomal RNA as a phylogenetic tool in plant systematics. — InSoltis, P. S., Soltis, D. E., Doyle, J. J., (Eds): Molecular systematics of plants, pp. 50–91. — New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanelt, P., 1960: Die Lupinen. — Wittenberg: Ziemsen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harborne, J. B., 1969: Chemosystematics of theLeguminosae. Flavonoid and isoflavonoid patterns in the tribeGenisteae. — Phytochemistry8: 1449–1456.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1971: Distribution of flavonoids in theLeguminosae. — InHarborne, J. B., Boulter, D., Turner, B. L., (Eds): Chemotaxonomy of theLeguminosae, pp. 31–67. — London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, (Eds), 1971: Chemotaxonomy of theLeguminosae. — London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegnauer, R., 1994: Chemotaxonomie der Pflanzen,11a,Leguminosae. — Basel: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herendeen, P. S., Crepet, W. L., Dilcher, D. L., 1992: The fossil history of theLeguminosae: phylogenetic and biogeographic implications. — InHerendeen, P. S., Dilcher, D. L., (Eds): Advances in legume systematics,4, pp. 303–316. — Kew: Royal Botanical Gardens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillis, D. M., Dixon, M. T., 1991: Ribosomal DNA: molecular evolution and phylogenetic inference. — Quarterly Rev. Biol.66: 411–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1992: Signal, noise, and reliability in molecular phylogenetic analyses. — J. Hered.83: 189–195.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock, C. L., Cronquist, A., Ownbey, M., Thompson, J. W., 1961: Vascular plants of the Pacific Northwest.3. — Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeneisen, M., Silva, M., Wink, M., Crawford, D. J., Stuessy, T., 1993: Alkaloids ofSophora of Juan Fernandez islands and related taxa. — Bol. Soc. Chilena Quimica38: 167–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holubova-Klaskova, A., 1964: Bemerkungen zur Gliederung der GattungCytisus L. s.l. — Acta Univ. Carol. Biol., Suppl.2: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hondelmann, W., 1996: Die Lupine: Geschichte und Evolution einer Kulturpflanze. — Wiss. Mitt. FAL Braunschweig-Völkenrode, Special issue162.

  • Hutchinson, J., 1964: The genera of flowering plants.1. — London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Käss, E., 1995: Molekulare Phylogenie der Schmetterlingsblütler (FamilieLeguminosae). — Ph.D. Thesis, University of Heidelberg.

  • —, 1992:rbcL sequences from lupins and other legume species. — Pl. Molec. Evol. Newslett.2: 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1994: Molecular phylogeny of lupins. — InMartins, J. M. N., Beirao Da Costa, M. L., (Eds): Advances in lupin research. Proceedings of the 7th International Lupin Conference, Evora, Portugal, pp. 267–270. — Lisbon: ISA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1995: Molecular phylogeny of thePapilionoideae (familyLeguminosae):RbcL gene sequences versus chemical taxonomy. — Bot. Acta108: 149–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1996: Molecular evolution of theLeguminosae: Phylogeny of the three subfamilies based onrbcL-sequences. — Biochem. Syst. Ecol.24: 365–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazimierski, T., Nowacki, E., 1961: Lupins of the Old World. — Genet. Polon.2: 113–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, M., 1980: A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. — J. Molec. Evol.16: 121–147.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kinghorn, A. D., Smolenski, S. J., 1981: Alkaloids ofPapilionoideae. — InPolhill, R. M., Raven, P. H., (Eds): Advances in legume systematics,2, pp. 585–598. — Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1984: Quinolizidine alkaloids of theLeguminosae: structural types, analysis, chemotaxonomy, and biological activities. — InPelletier, E. S., (Ed.): Alkaloids: chemical and biological perspectives, pp. 105–148. — New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S., Tamura, K., Nei, M., 1993: MEGA molecular evolutionary genetics analysis, version 1.0. — Pennsylvania State University.

  • Lavin, M., Doyle, J. J., Palmer, J. D., 1990: Evolutionary significance of the loss of the chloroplast-DNA inverted repeat in theLeguminosae subfamilyPapilionoideae. — Evolution44: 390–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, W. P., Maddison, D. R., 1992: MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, version 3.0. — Sunderland: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mears, J. A., Mabry, T. J., 1971: Alkaloids in theLeguminosae. — InHarborne, J. B., Boulter, D., Turner, B. L., (Eds): Chemotaxonomy of theLeguminosae, pp. 83–168. — London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, K. W., Bohm, B. A., 1983: Flavonoids and affinities of some North American lupines. — Canad. J. Bot.61: 708–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowacki, E., Jaworski, A., 1978: A study on the evolution of the genusLupinus by serological methods. — Genet. Polon.5: 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olmstead, R. G., Palmer, J. D., 1994: Chloroplast DNA systematics: a review of methods and data analysis. — Amer. J. Bot.81: 1205–1224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, J. D., Singh, G. P., Pillay, D. T. N., 1983: Structure and sequence evolution of three legume chloroplast DNAs. — Molec. Gen. Genet.190: 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1987: Chloroplast DNA evolution among legumes: loss of a large inverted repeat occurred prior to other sequence rearrangements. — Curr. Genet.11: 275–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1988: Evolutionary significance of inversions in legume chloroplast DNAs. — Curr. Genet.14: 65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palomino, G., Martinez, P., Bernal, C., Sousa, S. M., 1993: Chromosomal differences among some species of the genusSophora L. andStyphnolobium Schott. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.80: 284–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, L. L., 1955: A revision of the perennial species ofLupinus of North America exclusive of Southwestern United States. — Res. Stud. State Coll. Wash.23: 161–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1957: Chromosome numbers inLupinus. — Madroño14: 30–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Planchuelo, A.M., 1982: Literature review of the genusLupinus. — Lupine Newslett.4: 37–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1984: Taxonomic studies ofLupinus in South America. — In: Proceedings of the Third International Lupin Conference, pp. 39–54. — La Rochelle: International Lupin Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1984: The simple leaved lupines and their relatives in Argentina. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.71: 92–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plitmann, U., 1981: Evolutionary history of the Old World lupines. — Taxon30: 430–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1984: Old World lupins: taxonomy, evolutionary relationships, and links with New World species. — In: Proceedings of the Third International Lupin Conference, pp. 56–66. — La Rochelle: International Lupin Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1984: Cytogeographical distribution of Old worldLupinus. — Webbia38: 531–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polhill, R. M., 1976:Genisteae (Adans.)Benth. and related tribes. — Bot. Syst.1: 143–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1981a:Papilionoideae. — InPolhill, R. M., Raven, P. H., (Eds): Advances in legume systematics.1, pp. 191–205. — Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1981b:Crotalarieae. — InPolhill, R. M., Raven, P. H., (Eds): Advances in legume systematics.1, pp. 399–402. — Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1981c:Podalyrieae. — InPolhill, R. M., Raven, P. H., (Eds): Advances in legume systematics.1, pp. 396–397. — Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, (Eds), 1981: Advances in legume systematics.1 &2. — Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, P. H., Polhill, R. M., 1981: Biogeography of theLeguminosae. — InPolhill, R. M., Raven, P. H., (Eds): Advances in legume systematics,1, pp. 409–425. — Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggins, R., Sholars, T., 1993:Lupinus. — InHickman, J. C., (Ed.): The Japson Manual, higher plants of California, pp. 622–636. — Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothmaler, W., 1944: Die Gliederung der GattungCytisus L. — Feddes Repert.53: 137–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salatino, A., Gottlieb, O. R., 1980: Quinolizidine alkaloids as systematic markers of thePapilionoideae. — Biochem. Syst. Ecol.8: 133–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1981: Quinolizidine alkaloids as systematic markers of theGenisteae. — Biochem. Syst. Ecol.9: 267–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1983: Chemogeographical evolution of quinolizidines inPapilionoideae. — Pl. Syst. Evol.143: 167–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmanowicz, B. P., 1995: Comparative study of seed albumins in the old-WorldLupinus species (Fabaceae) by reversed-phase HPLC. — Pl. Syst. Evol.195: 77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1994: Electrophoretic patterns of seed albumins in the Old-WorldLupinus species (Fabaceae): variation in the 2S albumin class. — Pl. Syst. Evol.192: 67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanger, F., Nicklen, S., Coulson, A. R., 1977: DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA74: 5463–5467.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanudo, A., 1979: Chromosome variability in theGenisteae (Adams.)Benth. (Leguminosae). — Webbia34: 363–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarich, V. M., Wilson, A. C., 1973: Generation time and genome evolution in primates. — Science179: 1144–1147.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. P., 1917–1938: Species Lupinorum. — California: Saratoga.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1944:Lupinus. — InAbrams, L., (Ed.): Illustrated Flora of the Pacific states,2, pp. 483–519. — Stanford University: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltis, P. S., Soltis, D. E., Doyle, J. J., 1992: Molecular systematics of plants. — New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sousa, S. M., Rudd, V. E., 1993: Revision of the genusStyphnolobium (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae, Sophoreae). — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.80: 270–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford, D. L., 1993: PAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1.1. Computer program distributed by the Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taubert, P., 1894:Leguminosae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien,3(3), pp. 70–396. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. L., 1981:Thermopsideae. — InPolhill, R. M., Raven, P. H., (Eds): Advances in legume systematics,1, pp. 403–408. — Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, S., 1873: Revision of the extra-tropical North American species of the generaLupinus, Potentilla andOenothera. — Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts8: 517–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. A., Demissie, A., Harborne, J. B., 1983: Flavonoids as taxonomic markers in Old WorldLupinus species. — Biochem. Syst. Ecol.11: 221–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wink, M., 1988: Plant breeding: importance of plant secondary metabolites for protection against pathogens and herbivors. — Theor. Appl. Genet.75: 225–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1992: The role of quinolizidine alkaloids in plant insect interactions. — InBernays, E. A., (Ed.): Insect plant interactions,4, pp. 131–166. — Boca Raton: IRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1993: Quinolizidine alkaloids. — InWaterman, P., (Ed.): Methods in plant biochemistry,8, pp. 197–239. — London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1983: Evidence for a wide-spread occurrence of the genes of quinolizidine alkaloid biosynthesis. — FEBS Lett.159: 196–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1993: Molecular versus chemical taxonomy. — InNahrstedt, A., (Ed.): Society for Medical Plant Research, 41st congress, pp. 17–18. — Stuttgart: Thieme.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1995: Patterns of quinolizidine alkaloids in 56 species of the genusLupinus. — Phytochemistry38: 139–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wojciechowski, M. F., Sanderson, M. J., Baldwin, B. G., Donoghue, M. J., 1993: Monophyly of aneuploidAstragalus (Fabaceae): evidence from nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer sequences. — Amer. J. Bot.80: 711–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki, M., Sato, A., Saito, K., Murakoshi, I., 1993: Molecular phylogeny based on RFLP and its relation with alkaloid patterns inLupinus plants. — Biol. Pharm. Bull.16: 1182–1184.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Pharmazeutische Biologie, Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 364, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany

    Ernst Käss & Michael Wink

Authors
  1. Ernst Käss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Wink
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Käss, E., Wink, M. Molecular phylogeny and phylogeography ofLupinus (Leguminosae) inferred from nucleotide sequences of therbcL gene and ITS 1 + 2 regions of rDNA. Pl Syst Evol 208, 139–167 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985439

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985439

Key words

Search

Navigation