Skip to main content
Log in

Computer-aided content analysis: A short primer

  • Articles
  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is a short introduction to computer-aided content analysis in which words or phrases are the basic units. The advantages of computer-aided content analysis are noted and some general issues in its use discussed. Several ways of manipulating text by computer are then illustrated, including ordered word frequency lists, key-word-in-context lists, concordances, classifications of text in terms of content categories, category counts, and category-based retrievals from text. Although examples are based on Democratic and Republican platforms in presidential campaigns, these techniques can be applied to texts from a variety of sources, including in-depth and open-ended interviews, fieldnotes, letters, speeches, newspapers, books, and diaries, to cite a few examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aries, Elizabeth 1973 Interaction Patterns and Themes of Male, Female, and Mixed Groups. Unpub. Ph.D. Dissertation, Harvard University.

  • Aries, Elizabeth 1977 “Male-female interpersonal styles in all male, all female, and mixed groups.” Pp. 292–299 in Alice G. Sargent (ed.), Beyond Sex Roles. New York: West Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berelson, Bernard 1952 Content Analysis in Communications Research. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry-Rogghe, Godelieve L. M. 1973 “Computation of collocations in lexical studies.” In A. J. Aitken, R. W. Bailey, and N. Hamilton-Smith (eds.), The Computer and Literary Studies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boden, Margaret 1977 Artificial Intelligence and Natural Man. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brent, Edward 1984 “Qualitative computing: Approaches and issues.” Qualitative Sociology (this issue).

  • Brunner, Ronald D. 1983 Forecasting growth ideologies. Discussion Paper No. 7. Boulder: University of Colorado Center for Public Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, Ronald D. and Katherine Livornese 1982 Subjective political change: A prospectus. Discussion Paper No. 5. Boulder: University of Colorado Center for Public Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1983 The President's annual message. Discussion Paper No. 8. Boulder: University of Colorado Center for Public Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, Walter Dean 1970 Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics: New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, Delores M. 1981 “Automated concordances and word indexes: The process, the programs, and the products.” Computers and the Humanities. 15:139–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1982 “Automated concordances and word-indexes: Machine decisions and editorial revisions.” Computers and the Humanities. 16: 195–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbonell, Jaime G. 1981 Subjective Understanding: Computer Models of Belief Systems. Ann Arbor: UMI Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWeese, L. C., III 1976 “Computer content analysis of printed media: A limited feasibility study.” Public Opinion Quarterly. 40:92–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1977 “Computer content analysis of ‘day-old’ newspapers: A feasibility study.” Public Opinion Quarterly. 41:91–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunphy, D. C., C. G. Bullard, and E. E. M. Crossing 1974 “Validation of the General Inquirer Harvard IV Dictionary.” Paper presented 1974 Pisa Conference on Content Analysis.

  • Firth, J. R. 1957 “Modes of meaning.” In Papers in Linguistics 1934–51. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geffroy, Annie, P. Lafon, Gill Seidel, and M. Tournier 1973 “Lexicometric analysis of co-occurrences.” In A.J. Aitken, R. Bailey, and N. Hamilton-Smith (eds.), The Computer and Literary Studies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbner, George, Ole R. Holsti, Klaus Krippendorff, William Paisley and Philip J. Stone, eds. 1969 The Analysis of Communication Content. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk, L. A. 1979 The Content Analysis of Verbal Behavior: Further Studies. New York: SP Medical & Scientific Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskel, Peggy J. 1971 “Collocations as a measure of stylistic variety.” In R. A. Wisbey (ed.), The Computer in Literary and Linguistic Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockey, Susan and Ian Marriott 1982 Oxford Concordance Program Version 1.0 Users' Manual. Oxford: Oxford University Computing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, Ole R. 1969 Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Donald Bruce 1979 National Party Platforms 1840–1976 (2 vols.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1982 National Party Platforms of 1980. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, Edward F. and Philip J. Stone 1975 Computer Recognition of English Word Senses. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Peter Philip Mohler, and Robert Philip Weber 1982 “Cultural indicators based on content analysis.” Quality and Quantity. 16:1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, Klaus 1980 Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, Harold D. and J. Zvi Namenwirth 1968 The Lasswell Value Dictionary. 3 vols. New Haven: Yale University, Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markoff, John, Gilbert Shapiro, and Sasha Weitman 1974 “Toward the integration of content analysis and general methodology.” In D. R. Heise (ed.), Sociological Methodology, 1975. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Namenwirth, J. Zvi 1969a “Marks of distinction: A content analysis of British mass and prestige newspaper editorials.” American Journal of Sociology. 74:343–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1969b “Some long and short term trends in one American political et al., The Analysis of Communication Content. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1970 “Prestige newspapers and the assessment of elite opinions.” Journalism Quarterly. 47:318–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1973 “The wheels of time and the interdependence of value change.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History. 3:649–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1983 “Why cultual indicators?” In Gabriele Melischek, Karl Erik Rosengren, and James Stappers (eds.), Cultural Indicators. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Namenwirth, J. Zvi 1984 “Value change and contrasts in communities of scientists, chemists, and economists since 1900.” In Robert Philip Weber and J. Zvi Namenwirth. Culture Indicators Research: A Content Analytic Perspective. Mimeo.

  • Namenwirth, J. Zvi, and Richard Bibbee. 1973 “Speech codes in the press.” Journal of Communication. 25:50–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Namenwirth, J. Zvi and Harold D. Lasswell 1970 The Changing Language of American Values: A Computer Study of Selected Party Platforms. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Namenwirth, J. Zvi and Robert Philip Weber 1984 “The Lasswell Value Dictionary.” In Robert Philip Weber and J. Zvi Namenwirth. Culture Indicators Research: A Content Analytic Perspective. Mimeo.

  • Ogilvie, Daniel M. 1966 “Procedures for improving the interpretation of tag scores: The case of Windle.” In P. Stone, et al., The General Inquirer: A Computer Approach to Content Analysis. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogilvie, Daniel M., Philip J. Stone, and Edward F. Kelly 1980 “Computer-aided content analysis.” In Robert B. Sjith and Peter K. Manning (eds.), Handbook of Social Science Research Methods. New York: Irvington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popko, Edward S. 1980 Key-Word-In-Context Bibliographic Indexing: Release 4.0 Users Manual. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University, Laboratory for Computer Graphics and Spatial Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, Michael J. and Samuel S. Coleman 1978 “Some considerations concerning encoding and concording texts.” Computers and the Humanities. 12:3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosengren, Karl E. 1981 Advances in Content Analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shank, Roger C. and Robert P. Abelson 1977 Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding. Hilldale, New Jersey: Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, Philip J., Dexter C. Dunphy, Marshall S. Smith, and Daniel M. Ogilvie 1966 The General Inquirer: A Computer Approach to Content Analysis. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, Edward R. 1978 Political Control of the Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Alvin W. The Empirical Delineation of Two Musical Taste Cutures: A Content Analysis of Best-Selling Soul and Popular Recordings from 1962–1973. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. New School for Social Research.

  • Weber, Robert Philip 1982 “Society and economy in the Western world system.” Social Forces. 59:1130–1148.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1982 “The long-term problem-solving dynamics of social systems.” European Journal of Political Research. 10:387–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1983a “Content analytic cultural indicators.” In Gabriele Melishek, Karl Erik Rosengren, and James Stappers (eds.), Cultural Indicators. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1983b “Measurement models for content analysis.” Quality and Quantity. 17:127–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weizenbaum, Joseph 1976 Computer Power and Human Reason. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported in part by Kurzweil Computer Products, Inc., a subsidiary of Xerox Corp. Sue Williamson of Kurzweil played a key role, and her generosity and help is gratefully acknowledged. Randi Lynn Miller assisted with data entry at an earlier phase of research. Additional support has been provided by ZUMA, the Center for Surveys, Methods, and Analysis, Mannheim, FRG. For helpful comments and suggestions, thanks to Tom Davenport, Peter Mohler, J. Zvi Namenwirth, Philip J. Stone, and especially one anonymous reviewer. Thanks also to Kathy Tenerowicz for research assistance and to Barbara Norman for editorial assistance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weber, R.P. Computer-aided content analysis: A short primer. Qual Sociol 7, 126–147 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987112

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987112

Keywords

Navigation