Abstract
Procedures for estimating the variability in dosage requirements of phenytoin to achieve steadystate plasma concentrations of 10–20 mg/liter and for estimating the plasma concentrations produced on a fixed dose are given. Further, a method is proposed for estimating the dosage required to achieve a desired steady-state plasma phenytoin concentration when a steady-state value on a known daily dose has been measured, A method is also described for estimating dosage requirements when two or more plasma concentrations have been measured. These methods are derived from data obtained on administering phenytoin in four to five different dosage regimens until steady state was achieved in each of nine volunteers. The drug was administered orally as a suspension every 8 hr, starting with about 100mg/day. The daily dose was increased in steps, and maintained at each daily dose rate for 6–14 days, or longer. Blood samples were drawn 4 and 8 hr after the last dose on 2 successive days at the end of each step and analyzed for phenytoin concentration. The average of these values was used to estimate the steady-state plasma concentration, Cpss. For each subject the Cpss values were fitted to a rearranged Michaelis-Menten equation Cpss =KmR/(Vm-R). In this equation R is the dosing rate, Vm is the maximum rate of metabolism, and Km is a constant equal to the plasma concentration at which the metabolism rate is one-half maximum. The average values found for Vm and Km were 10.3 mg/kg/day and 11.54 mg/liter, respectively. The individual values of Vm and Km appear to be constant over time, but there is considerable interindividual variability: coefficients of variation are 25% and 50%, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
F. Bochner, W. D. Hooper, J. J. Tryer, and M. J. Eadie. Effect of dosage increments on blood phenytoin concentrations.J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat. 35:873–876 (1972).
L. G. Borofsky, S. Levis, H. Kutt, and M. Roqinsky. Diphenylhydantoin: Efficacy, toxicity, and dose-serum level relationships in children.J. Pediat. 81:995–1002 (1972).
G. E. Mawer, P. W. Müllen, and M. Rogers. Phenytoin dose adjustment in epileptic patients.Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 1:163–168 (1974).
A. Richens and A. Dunlop. Serum phenytoin levels in management of epilepsy.Lancet 2:247–248 (1975).
A. J. Atkinson and J. M. Shaw. Pharmacokinetics study of a patient with diphenylhydantoin toxicity.Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 14:521–528 (1973).
N. Gerber, R. Lynn, and J. Oates. Acute intoxication with 5,5-diphenylhydantoin (DilantinR) associated with impairment of biotransformation.Ann. Intern. Med. 77:765–771 (1972).
G. W. Houghton and A. Richens. Rate of elimination of tracer doses of phenytoin at different steady-state serum phenytoin concentrations in epileptic patients.Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 1:155–161 (1974).
J. Koch-Weser. The serum level approach to individualization of drug dosage.Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 9:1–8 (1975).
H. Kutt, R. Brennan, H. Dehejia, and K. Verebely. Diphenylhydantoin intoxication.Am. Rev. Resp. Dis. 101:377–384 (1970).
J. T. Bigger, D, H. Schmidt, and H. Kutt. Relationship between the plasma level of diphenylhydantoin sodium and its cardiac antiarrhythmic effects.Circulation 36:363–374 (1968).
F. Buchthal and M. A. Lennox-Buchthal. Diphenyhydantoin: Relation of anticonvulsant effect to concentration in serum. In D. M. Woodbury (ed.),Anticonvulsant Drugs, Raven Press, New York, 1972.
T. H. Doenna, G. De Crousaz, I. Magrini, P. Bechtel, and J. L. Schelling. Plasma concentrations of diphenylhydantoin in the epileptic: Its interest for the clinician.Schweiz. Med. Wschr. 105:936–940 (1975).
K. P. Dowson and A. Jemieson. Value of blood phenytoin estimation in management of childhood elipepsy.Arch. Dis. Child. 46:386–388 (1971).
G. W. Houghton, A. Richens, P. A. Toseland, S. Davidson, and M. A. Falconer. Brain concentrations of phenytoin, phenobarbitone and primidone in epileptic patients.Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 9:73–78 (1975).
H. Kutt, W. Winters, R. Kokenge, and F. McDowell. Diphenylhydantoin metabolism, blood levels and toxicity.Arch. Neurol 11:642–648 (1964).
L. Lund. Anticonvulsant effects of diphenylhydantoin relative to plasma levels: A prospective 3 year study in ambulant patients with generalized epileptic seizures.Arch. Nerol. 31:289–294 (1974).
J. M. Hansen, M. Kristensen, L. Skovsted, and L. K. Christensen. Dicoumarol-induced diphenylhydantoin intoxication.Lancet 2:265–266 (1966).
A. J. Glazko, T. Chang, J. Baukema, W. A. Dill, J. R. Goulet, and R. A. Buckanan. Metabolic disposition of diphenylhydantoin in normal human subjects following intravenous dministration.Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 10:498–504 (1969).
B. J. Wilder, E. E. Serrano, E. Ramsey, and R. A. Bachanan. A method for shifting from oral to intramuscular diphenylhydantoin administration.Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 16:507–513 (1974).
D. S. Adler, E. Martin, J. G. Gambertoglio, T. N. Tozer, and J. P. Spire. Hemodialysis of phenytoin in a uremic patient.Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 18:65–69 (1975).
V. P. Shah, S. M. Wallace, and S. Riegelman. A microultrafiltration technique for drug-protein binding determination in plasma.J. Pharm. Sci. 63:1364–1366 (1974).
L. B. Sheiner, B. Rosenberg, and K. L. Melmon. Modelling of individual pharmacokinetics for computer-aided drug dosage.Comp. Biomed. Res. 5:441–459 (1972).
L. B. Sheiner, H. Halkin, C. Peck, B. Rosenberg, and K. L. Melmon. Improved computer-assisted digoxin therapy.Ann. Intern. Med. 82:619–627 (1975).
M. Ehrnebo and I. Odar-Cederlof. Binding of amobarbital, pentobarbital and diphenyShydantoin to blood cells and plasma proteins in healthy volunteers and uraemic patients.Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 8:445–453 (1975).
W. D. Hooper, F. Bochner, M. J. Eadie, and J. H. Tyrer. Plasma protein binding of diphenylhydantoin: Effects of sex hormones, renal and hepatic disease.Clin. Pharm. Ther. 15:276–282 (1973).
I. Odar-Cederlof and O. Borga. Kinetics of diphenylhydantoin in uremic patients: Consequences of decreased protein binding.Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 7:3137 (1974).
M. M. Reidenberg, I. Odar-Cederlof, C. von Bahr, O. Borga, and F. Sjoqvist. Protein binding of diphenylhydantoin and desmethylimipramine in plasma from patients with poor renal function.New Engl. J. Med. 285:264–267 (1971).
D. W. Shoenman and D. L. Azarnoff. The alteration of plasma proteins in uremias as reflected in their ability to bind digoxin and diphenylhydantoin in man.Pharmacology 7:169–177 (1972).
R. Gugler, C. V. Manion, and D. L. Azarnoff. Phenytoin: Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability.Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 19:135–142 (1976).
J. M. Hansen, M. Kristensen, L. Skovstead, and L. K. Christensen. Dicoumarol-induced diphenylhydantoin intoxication.Lancet 2:265–266 (1966).
B. Lumholtz, K. Siersbaek-Nielsen, L. Skovsted, J. Kampmann, and J. M. Hansen. Sulfamethizole-induced inhibition of diphenylhydantoin, tolbutamide and warfarin metabolism.Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 17:731–734 (1975).
P. L. Morselli, M. Rizzo, and S. Garattini. Interaction between phenobarbital and diphenylhydantoin in animals and epileptic patients.Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 179:88–107 (1971).
G. E. Solomon, M. W. Hilgartner, and H. Kutt. Coagulation defects caused by diphenylhydantoin.Neurology 22:1165–1171 (1972).
T. F. Blaschke, P. J. Meffin, K. L. Melmon, and M. Rowland. Influence of acute viral hepatitis on phenytoin kinetics and protein binding.Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 17:685–691 (1975).
H. Kutt, W. Winters, R. Scherman, and F. McDowell. Diphenylhydantoin and phenobarbital toxicity: The role of liver disease.Arch. Neurol. (Chicago) 11:649–656 (1964).
M. Sparberg. Lesser known complications of diphenylhydantoin therapy.Ann. Intern. Med. 59:914–930 (1963).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported in part by grants (GM-16496, GM-01791, and GM-00001) from the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Martin was a recipient of a grant from the Swiss National Research Foundation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martin, E., Tozer, T.N., Sheiner, L.B. et al. The clinical pharmacokinetics of phenytoin. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 5, 579–596 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059685
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059685