Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring fertility norms

  • Published:
Population and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We argue that social norms must be measured at the group level of analysis, allow for a range of acceptable behaviors, and be linked to the individual level of analysis to explain social behavior. From a survey of young adults in Wisconsin (1973), we generated measures of family size norms from sibship experience and friends' expected family size. These measures satisfied our primary criterion for a social norm: Those with non-normative family size desires tended to shift expectations toward the norm. The analyses demonstrate the difficulty of estimating normative effects when by its very definition a norm is expected to restrict variation in human behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blake, J., & K. Davis. (1964). Norms, values, and sanctions. In R.E.L. Faris (Ed.),Handbook of Modern Sociology (pp. 456–484). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, J., & J.H. del Pinal. (1981). Negativism, equivocation, and wobbly assent: Public "support" for the prochoice platform on abortion.Demography, 18 309–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, L.G., & J.W. Selby. (1980). Voluntary childlessness, involuntary childlessness, and having children: A study of social perceptions.Family Relations, 29(April 181–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clay, D.C., & J.J. Zuiches. (1980). Reference groups and family size norms.Population and Environment, 3(Fall/Winter 262–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cautley, P.W., & E.F. Borgatta. (1975). Role definitions and fertility orientations. Working Paper 75-36, Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, C.H., L.C. Coombs, & G.M. McClelland. (1975). Preference scales for number and sex of children.Population Studies, 29 273–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, A.R., & J.J. Jaccard. (1975). Population psychology: A new look at an old problem.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(6 1073–1082.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R.A. (1978). What will 1984 be like? Socioeconomic implications of recent twists in age structure.Demography, 15 397–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried, E.S., & J.R. Udry. (1980). Normative pressures on fertility planning.Population and Environment, 3 (Fall/Winter 199–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granberg, D., & B.W. Granberg. (1981). Pro-life versus Pro-choice: another look at the abortion controversy in the U.S.Sociology and Social Research 65 424–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, J. (1973). Social pressure on family size intentions.Family Planning Perspectives 5, (Fall 237–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henley, J.R., Jr., & S.O. Gustavus. (1977). An exploratory technique for measuring fertility norms.Social Biology, 24(Summer 149–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houseknecht, S.K. (1977). Reference group support for voluntary childlessness: Evidence for conformity.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39(2 285–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houseknecht, S.K. (1978). Voluntary childlessness: A social-psychological model.Alternative Lifestyles, 1(August 379–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. (1975). Normative power and conflict potential.Sociological Methods and Research, 4 237–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, K.O. (1983). Norms relating to the desire for children. In R.A. Bulatao and R.D. Lee (Eds.),Determinants of Fertility in Developing countries. Vol. 1. Supply and Demand for Children. (pp. 388–428). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1951).Social Structure. Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, R.G., Jr., & J.F. Kautner. (1955). The influence of siblings and friends on fertility.The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 33 246–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P.H., & R.A. Berk. (1985). Varieties of normative consensus.American Sociological Review, 50 333–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trent, R.B. (1980). Evidence bearing on the construct validity of ideal family size.Population and Environment, 3(Fall/Winter 309–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Udry, J.R. (1982). The effect of normative pressures on fertility.Population and Environment, 5 109–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veevers, J.E. (1980).Childless by Choice. Scarborough, Ontario: Buttersworths.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomson, E., Goldman, P. Measuring fertility norms. Popul Environ 9, 173–185 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01259307

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01259307

Keywords

Navigation