Skip to main content
Log in

Anterior cervical allograft arthrodesis and instrumentation: Multilevel interbody grafting or strut graft reconstruction

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This retrospective study evaluated a single surgeon's series of patients treated by multilevel cervical disc excision (two or three levels), allograft tricortical iliac crest arthrodesis, and anterior instrumentation. The objective of this retrospective study was to compare fusion success and clinical outcome between multilevel Smith-Robinson interbody grafting and tricortical iliac strut graft reconstruction, both supplemented with anterior instrumentation in the cervical spine. The incidence of nonunion for cervical discectomy and fusion varies widely depending on the number of disc levels involved, type of bone graft used, and whether the anterior grafting is supplemented with instrumentation. An alternative to multilevel interbody fusion is corpectomy and strut grafting, in which the incidence of nonunion has been reported to be 27% with autograft and 41% with allograft. Sixty-four consecutive patients who underwent allograft tricortical iliac crest reconstruction and anterior cervical plating were studied. The average follow-up was 39 months. There were 38 patients in the discectomy and interbody grafting group and 26 patients in the corpectomy and strut graft reconstruction group. Pseudoarthrosis occurred in 42% of the anterior cervical interbody fusion patients and 31% of the corpectomy patients. Nonunion in two-level interbody fusions occurred in 36% of the patients as compared to 10% for patients with one-level corpectomies; while 54% of patients with three-level interbody fusions and 44% of patients with two-level corpectomies were noted to have pseudoarthrosis. Higher percentages of nonunion were noted in multilevel interbody grafting than in corpectomy with strut grafting and when more vertebral levels were involved. These radiographic and clinical findings underscore the shortcomings of multilevel anterior cervical allograft reconstruction with plating. Corpectomy may be the preferred method when multiple disc levels are fused. In addition, anterior corpectomy affords decompression of significant osteophytes in a safer and quicker manner. In retrospective studies, there is a need for long-term follow-up before accurate statements can be made about the study population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aebi M, Mohler J, Zäch GA, Morscher E (1986) Indication, surgical technique, and results of 100 surgicallytreated fractures and fracture-dislocation of the cervical spine. Clin Orthop 203:244–257

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aebi M, Zuber K, Marchesi D (1991) Treatment of cervical spine injuries with anterior plating. Indications, techniques, and results. Spine 16:S38-S45

    Google Scholar 

  3. Böhler J, Gaudernak T (1980) Anterior plate stabilization for fracture-dislocations of the lower cervical spine. J Trauma 20:203–205

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bremer AM, Nguyen TQ (1983) Internal metal plate fixation combined with anterior interbody fusion in cases of cervical spine injury. Neurosurgery 12:649–652

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brodke DS, Zdeblick TA (1992) Modified Smith-Robinson procedure for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine 17:S427–5430

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brown MD, Malinin TI, Davis PB (1976) A roentgenographic evaluation of frozen allografts versus autografts in anterior cervical spine fusions. Clin Orthop 119:231–236

    Google Scholar 

  7. Caspar W, Barbier DB, Klara PM (1989) Anterior cervical fusion and Caspar plate stabilization for cervical trauma. Neurosurgery 25:491–502

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cloward RB (1958) The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. J Neurosurg 15:602–617

    Google Scholar 

  9. DePalma AF, Rothman RH, Lewinnek GE, Canale ST (1972) Anterior interbody fusion for severe cervical disc degeneration. Surg Gynecol Obstet 134:755–758

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fernyhough JC, White JI, LaRocca H (1991) Fusion rates in multilevel cervical spondylosis comparing allograft fibula with autograft fibula in 126 patients. Spine 16:5561–8564

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gore DR, Sepic SB (1984) Anterior cervical fusion for degenerated or protruded discs. Spine 9:667–671

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hanai K, Fujiyoshi F, Kamei K (1986) Subtotal vertebrectomy and spinal fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 11:310–315

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hubach PCG (1994) A prospective study of cervical spondylodesis in intervertebral disc disorders. Eur Spine J 3:209–213

    Google Scholar 

  14. Johnston FG, Crockard HA (1995) One-stage internal fixation and anterior fusion in complex cervical spinal disorders. J Neurosurg 82:234–238

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kostuik JP, Connolly PJ, Esses SI, Sun P (1993) Anterior cervical plate fixation with the titanium hollow screw plate system. Spine 18:1273–1278

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lindsey RW, Newhouse KE, Leach J, Murphy MJ (1987) Nonunion following two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Clin Orthop 223:155–163

    Google Scholar 

  17. Müller EJ, Aebi M (1992) Anterior fusion of the cervical spine. Spine State Art Rev 6:459–474

    Google Scholar 

  18. Okada K, Shirasaki N, Hayashi H, Oka S, Hosoya T (1991) Treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy by enlargement of the spinal canal anteriorly, followed by arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 73:352–363

    Google Scholar 

  19. Scuderi GJ, Bengt L, Garfin SR (1993) Complications in anterior corpectomy and strut fusion. Oper Tech Orthop 3: 251–256

    Google Scholar 

  20. Simmons EH, Bhalla SK (1969) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a clinical and biomechanical study with eight-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 51:225–237

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tippets RH, Apfelbaum RI (1988) Anterior cervical fusion with the Caspar instrumentation system. Neurosurgery 22:1008–1013

    Google Scholar 

  22. Whitecloud TS, LaRocca H (1976) Fibular strut graft in reconstructive surgery of the cervical spine. Spine 1: 33–43

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yonenobu K, Fuji T, Ono K, Okada K, Yamamoto T, Harada N (1985) Choice of surgical treatment for multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 10:710–716

    Google Scholar 

  24. Young WF, Rosenwasser RH (1993) An early comparative analysis of the use of fibular allograft versus autologous iliac crest graft for interbody fusion after anterior cervical discectomy. Spine 18:1123–1124

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zdeblick TA, Ducker TB (1991) The use of freeze-dried allograft bone for anterior cervical fusions. Spine 16: 726–729

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. L. Lowery.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Swank, M.L., Lowery, G.L., Bhat, A.L. et al. Anterior cervical allograft arthrodesis and instrumentation: Multilevel interbody grafting or strut graft reconstruction. Eur Spine J 6, 138–143 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01358747

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01358747

Key words

Navigation