Skip to main content
Log in

Reoperation after lumbar disc surgery: Results in 130 cases

  • Clinical Articles
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Out of a series of 1850 cases operated upon for lumbar disc herniation 130 underwent re-operation because of persistent or recurrent symptoms. Re-operation was successful in 62%. The prognosis of re-operation was not related to special clinical symptoms and signs but only to the operative findings.

Herniations at other levels and recurrences of lumbar disc herniations had the best results (excellent in 98% respectively 54%), but scar formations alone came out much less satisfactory (only 38% excellent results).

Computed tomography (CT) findings were less reliable in distinguishing between disc prolapse and fibrosis than magnet resonance imaging (MR). Therefore MR is the diagnostic method of choice in these conditions, and scar formations alone should be considered a contra-indication for re-operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barr JC, Kubik CS, Molloy MK (1967) Evaluation of end results in treatment oof ruptured lumbar intervertebral discs with protrusion of nucleus pulposus. Surg Gynecol Obstet 125: 250–256

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cooper DF, Feuer H (1982) Lumbar microdiscectomy. J Indiana State Med Assoc 74: 674–675

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ebeling U, Reichenberg W, Reulen HJ (1986) Results of microsurgical lumbar discectomy. Review of 485 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 81: 45–52

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ebeling U, Kalbarcyk H, Reulen HJ (1989) Microsurgical reoperation following lumbar disc surgery. Timing, surgical findings, and outcome in 92 patients. J Neurosurg 70: 397–404

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fankhauser H, Mansouri B, de Tribolet N (1986) Ré-intervention apres cure de Hernie discale. Confrontation entre radiologie et constatation opératoire dans 18 cas. Neurochirurgie 32: 52–55

    Google Scholar 

  6. Finnegan WJ, Fenlin JM, Marvel JP, Nardini RJ, Rothman RH (1979) Results of surgical intervention in the symptomatic multiply-operated back patient. Analysis of sixty-seven cases followed for three to seven years. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 61:1077–1082

    Google Scholar 

  7. Frocrain L, Duvauferrier R, Husson JL, Noël J, Ramée A, Pawlotsky Y (1989) Recurrent postoperative sciatica: evaluation with MR Imaging and enhanced CT. Radiology 170: 531–533

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goald HJ (1981) Microlumbar discectomy: follow-up of 477 patients. J Microsurg 2: 95–100

    Google Scholar 

  9. Greenwood J Jr, McGuire TH, Kimbell F (1952) Study of causes of failure in the herniation intervertebral disc operation: an analysis of sixty-seven reoperation cases. J Neurosurg 9: 15–20

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gurdjian ES, Ostrowski AZ, Hardy WG,et al (1961) Results of operative treatment of protruded and ruptured lumbar discs. J Neurosurg 18: 783–791

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hueftle MG, Modic MT, Ross JS,et al (1988) Lumbar spine: Postoperative MR imaging with Gd-DTPA. Radiology 167: 817–824

    Google Scholar 

  12. Law JD, Lehman RAW, Kirsch WM (1978) Reoperation after lumbar intervertebral disc surgery. J Neurosurg 48: 259–263

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lewis PJ, Weir BKA, Broad RW,et al (1987) Long term prospective study of lumbosacral discectomy. J Neurosurg 67: 49–53

    Google Scholar 

  14. Maroon JC, Abla AA (1985) Microlumbar discectomy. Clin Neurosurg 33: 407–47

    Google Scholar 

  15. Salenius P, Laurent LE (1977) Results of operative treatment of lumbar disc herniation. A survey of 886 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 48: 630–634

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schubiger O, Valavanis A (1982) CT differentiation between recurrent disc herniation and postoperative scar formation: the value of contrast enhancement. Neuroradiology 22: 251–254

    Google Scholar 

  17. Thomalske G, Galow W, Ploke G (1977) Critical comments on a comparison of two series (1000 patients each) of lumbar disc surgery. Adv Neurosurg 4: 22–27

    Google Scholar 

  18. Williams RW (1978) Microlumbar discectomy: a conservative surgical approach to the virgin herniated lumbar disc. Spine 3: 175–182

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wilson DH, Kenning J (1979) Microsurgical lumbar discectomy: preliminary report of 83 consecutive cases. Neurosurgery 42: 137–140

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wiltse LL (1977) Surgery for intervertebral disk disease of the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop 129: 22–45

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wiltse LL (1975) Psychological testing predicting the success of low back surgery. Orthop Clin North Am 6: 317–318

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yang PJ, Seeger JF, Dzioba RB (1986) Highdose IV contrast in CT scanning of the postoperative lumbar spine. AJNR 7: 703–707

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fandiño, J., Botana, C., Viladrich, A. et al. Reoperation after lumbar disc surgery: Results in 130 cases. Acta neurochir 122, 102–104 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01446994

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01446994

Keywords

Navigation