Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Proprioception in the nearly extended knee

Measurements of position and movement in healthy individuals and in symptomatic anterior cruciate ligament injured patients

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Proprioception of the knee was measured in 19 healthy individuals to evaluate whether there were any differences between extension and flexion movements from two different starting positions. The threshold before detecting a passive movement, visual estimation on a protractor of a passive change in position (30o angular change) and active reproduction of the same angular change were registered. The reference population was tested twice to study normal variation and reproducibility, followed by the evaluation of 20 patients with chronic, symptomatic and unilateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees. In the normal population no differences were found between the right and the left leg, men and women, or measurements made at the first and at the second test occasion. The thresholds from a starting position of 20o were lower for extension than for flexion. When comparing the thresholds for extension between the 20o and the 40o starting position, lower values were lower from the 40o starting position. than from the 20o starting position. The active reproduction of an angular change of 30o was more accurate during flexion (30o–60o) than during extension (60o-30o). There were no differences in the reproduction tests or in thresholds from the 40o starting position between the patients and the normal group, but the patients had higher thresholds from the 20o starting position, in movements towards both extension 1.0o (range 0.5o–12.0o) and flexion 1.5o (range 0.5o–10.0o) than the normal group 0.75o (range 0.5o–2.25o) (P=0.01) and 1.0o (range 0.5o–3.0o) (P=0.06), respectively. Thus, information of passive movements in the nearly extended knee position was more sensitive towards extension than towards flexion in threshold tests and the sensitivity improved closer to full extension, which implies a logical joint protective purpose. In this nearly extended knee position, which is the basis for most weight-bearing activities, patients with symptomatic ACL-deficient knees had an impaired awareness in detecting a passive movement. There were no differences in the more flexed position or in the reproduction tests between the patients and the normal group, and reproduction tests in the present form seem less appropriate to use in the evaluation of ACL injuries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barrack RL, Skinner HB, Cook SD, Haddad RJ Jr (1983) Effect of articular disease and total knee arthroplasty in knee joint position sense. J Neurophysiol 50:684–687

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barrack RL, Skinner HB, Cook SD (1984) Proprioception of the knee joint Paradoxical effect of training. Am J Phys. Med 63: 175–181

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barrack RL, Skinner HB, Buckley SL (1989) Proprioception in the anterior cruciate deficient knee. Am J Sports Med 17: 1–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barrett DS (1991) Proprioception and function after anterior cruciate reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 73: 833–837

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barrett DS, Cobb AG, Bentley G (1991) Joint proprioception in normal, osteoarthritic and replaced knees. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 73: 53–56

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baxendale RA, Ferrell WR, Wood L (1988) Responses of quadriceps motor units to mechanical stimulation of knee joint receptors in the decerebrate cat. Brain Res 453: 150–156

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Burgess PR, Clark FJ (1969) Characteristics of knee joint receptors in the cat. J Physiol 203: 317–335

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Clark FJ, Burgess PR (1975) Slowly adapting receptors in cat knee joint: can they signal joint angle? J Neurophysiol 38: 1436–1447

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Clark FJ, Burgess RC, Chapin JW, Lipscomb WT (1985) Role of intramuscular receptors in the awareness of limb position. J. Neurophysiol 54: 1529–1540

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Clark FJ, Grigg P, Chapin JW (1989) The contribution of articular receptors to proprioception with the fingers in humans. J. Neurophysiol 61: 186–193

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Co FH, Skinner HB, Cannon WD (1993) Effect of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament on proprioception of the knee and the heel strike transient. J. Orthop Res 11: 696–704

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Corrigan JP, Cashman WF, Brady MP (1992) Proprioception in the cruciate deficient knee. J. Bone Joint Surg [Br] 74: 247–250

    Google Scholar 

  13. Finsterbush A, Friedman B (1975) The effect of sensory denervation on rabbit's knee joints. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 57: 949–956

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fridén T, Egund N, Lindstrand A (1993) Comparison of symptomatic versus nonsymptomatic patients with chronic anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Radiographic sagittal displacement during weightbearing. Am J Sports Med 21: 389–393

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gandevia SC, McCloskey DI (1976) Joint sense, muscle sense, and their combination as position sense, measured at the distal interphalangeal joint of the middle finger. J. Physiol [Lond] 260: 387–407

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gottlieb DJ, Beynnon BD, Elmqvist L-G, Cook L, Dirks M, Renström PA (1994) Evaluation of passive joint position sense measurement. 40th Annual Meeting of the ORS, New Orleans

  17. Grigg P (1976) Response of joint afferent neurones in cat medial articular nerve to active and passive movements of the knee. Brain Res 118: 482–485

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Grigg P, Greenspan BJ (1977) Response of primate joint afferent neurones to mechanical stimulation of the knee joint. J. Neurophysiol 40: 1–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gupta R (1993) A short history of neuropathic arthropathy. Clin Orthop 296: 43–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Harter RA, Osternig LR, Singer KM, James SL, Larson RL, Jones DC (1988) Long-term evaluation of knee stability and function following surgical reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Am J Sports Med 16: 434–443

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Horch KW, Clark FJ, Burgess PR (1975) Awareness of knee joint angle under static conditions. J. Neurophysiol 38: 1436–1447

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Johansson H, Sjölander P, Sojka P (1991) A sensory role for the cruciate ligaments. Clin Orthop 268: 161–178

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Johansson H, Sjölander P, Sojka P (1991) Receptors in the knee joint and their role in the biomechanics of the joint. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 18: 341–368

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kaplan FS, Nixon JE, Reitz M, Rindfleish L, Tucker J (1985) Age-related changes in proprioception and sensation of joint position. Acta Orthop Scand 56: 72–74

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lephart SM, Kocher MS, Fu FH, Borsa PA, Harner CD (1992) Proprioception following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J. Sports Rehab 1: 188–196

    Google Scholar 

  26. Marks R, Quinney HA, Wessel J (1993) Proprioceptive sensibility in women with normal and osteoarthritic knee joints. Clin Rheumatol 12: 170–175

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Newberg TA (1986) Examining joint position sense in knees having undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Thesis University of Oregon, Eugene

    Google Scholar 

  28. Paillard J, Brouchon M (1968) Active and passive movements in the calibration of position sense. In: Freedman SJ (ed) The neuropsychology of spatial oriented behaviour. Homewood, Dorsey, pp 37–55

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pitman M, Nainzadeh N, Menche D, Gasalberti R, Kyoo Song E (1992) The intraoperative evaluation of the neurosensory function of the anterior cruciate ligament in humans using somatosensory evoked potentials. Arthroscopy 8: 442–447

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.Schulz RA, Miller DC, Kerr CS, Micheli L (1984) Mechanoreceptors in human cruciate ligaments. A histological study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 66: 1072–1076

    Google Scholar 

  31. Schutte MJ, Dabezies EJ, Zimney ML, Happel LT (1978) Neural anatomy of the human anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 69: 243–247

    Google Scholar 

  32. Skinner HB, Barrack RL, Cook SD (1984) Age related decline in proprioception. Clin Orthop 184: 208–211

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Skoglund S (1956) Anatomical and physiological studies of knee joint innervation in the cat. Acta Physiol Scand 36 [Suppl 124]: 1–101

    Google Scholar 

  34. Solomonow M, Baratta R, Zhou BH, Shoji H, Bose W, Beck C, D'Ambrosia R (1987) The synergistic action of the anterior cruciate ligament and thigh muscles in maintaining joint stability. Am J Sports Med 15: 207–213

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Swash M (1986) Position sense in a damaged knee. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 49: 100–101

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Swinkels A, Ward CD, Bagust J (1994) Effect of immobilisation on position and movement sense of the knee. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 57: 382–383

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop 198: 43–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Warren PJ, Olanlokun TK, Cobb AG, Bentley G (1993) Proprioception after knee arthroplasty. The influence of prosthetic design. Clin Orthop 297: 182–187

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Williams W (1981) A systems-oriented evaluation of the role of joint receptors and other afferents in position and motion sense. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 7: 23–77

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Zimney ML (1988) Mechanoreceptors in articular tissues. Am J Anat 182: 16–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital, S-22185, Lund, Sweden

    T. Fridén, D. Roberts & A. Lindstrand

  2. Department of Rehabilitation, University Hospital Lund, S-22185, Lund, Sweden

    R. Zätterström & U. Moritz

Authors
  1. T. Fridén
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. Roberts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Zätterström
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Lindstrand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. U. Moritz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fridén, T., Roberts, D., Zätterström, R. et al. Proprioception in the nearly extended knee. Knee Surg, Sports traumatol, Arthroscopy 4, 217–224 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01567966

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01567966

Key words

Search

Navigation