Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Influence of age and parity on the development of the human breast

  • Report
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Breast cancer is heavily influenced by the reproductive history of the individual. Pregnancy has a protective effect which is attributed to differences in the degree of differentiation of the breast. The purpose of this work was to determine whether the quantity and the type of parenchymal structures present in the human breast were related to the age and parity history of a woman. Fifty-one human breast samples were obtained from bilateral or unilateral reduction mammoplasties performed in 40 parous women ranging in age from 18 to 57 years, and 11 nulliparous women ranging in age from 14 to 54 years. An average of 100 grams of tissue/specimen were processed for whole mount. A total of 650 slides were examined and 31,222 structures were classified and counted under the light microscope. The following mammary structures were identified: terminal structures (TS), and lobules (LOB) type 1, 2, and 3. Results were plotted for the total patient population and separately for nulliparous and parous women against age. The total patient population contained similar proportions of Lobl, 2, and 3 between ages 14–18, with a reduction of percentage of Lobl and increase in Lob3 between ages 23 to the middle forties, when Lob3 decreased and Lobl increased to 70%. Lob2 and TS did not exhibit significant changes throughout the period of life analyzed. When analyzed separately it was found that the breasts of nulliparous women were predominantly composed of Lob1, fewer Lob2, with Lob3 almost completely absent, whereas parous women had a high frequency of Lob3, which were the predominant structures until the fourth decade of life. Thereafter, their number decreased, with a concomitant increase in Lob1. These changes resulted in a similar appearance in the architecture of the breast of parous and nulliparous women after the fifth decade of life. It was concluded that there are striking differences in the developmental pattern of the breast between nulliparous and parous women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Russo J, Russo IH: Development of the human mammary gland. In: Neville MC, Daniel C (eds) The Mammary Gland. Plenum, New York, 1987, pp 67–93

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dabelow A: Die Milchdruse. In: Bargmann W (ed) Handbuch der Mikroskopischen Anatomie des Menschen. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1957, pp 277–485

    Google Scholar 

  3. Salazar H, Tobon H: Morphologic changes of the mammary gland during development, pregnancy and lactation. In: Josimovich J (ed) Lactogenic Hormones, Fetal Nutrition and Lactation. Wiley, New York, 1974, pp 221–277

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vorherr H: The Breast. Academic Press, New York, 1974, pp 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  5. Russo J, Gusterson BA, Rogers AE, Russo IH, Welling SSR, Van Zwieten MJ: Comparative study of human and rat mammary tumorigenesis. Lab Invest 62: 244–278, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Russo J, Reina D, Frederick J, Russo IH: Expression of phenotypical changes by human breast epithelial cells treated with carcinogensin vitro. Cancer Res 48: 2837–2857, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cole P, MacMahon B: Oestrogen fractions during early reproductive life in the aetiology of breast cancer. Lancet i: 604–606, 1969

    Google Scholar 

  8. MacMahon B, Cole P, Liu M, Lowe CR, Mirra AP, Ravnihar B, Salber EJ, Valaoras VG, Yuasa S: Age at first birth and breast cancer risk. Bull WHO 43: 209–221, 1970

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Valaoras VG, MacMahon B, Trichopoulos D, Polychronopoulou A: Lactation and reproductive histories of breast cancer patients in Greater Athens 1965–1967. Int J Cancer 4: 350–360, 1969

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. MacMahon B, Cole P, Brown J: Etiology of human breast cancer: A review. J Natl Cancer Inst 50: 21–42, 1973

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wynder EL, Bross IJ, Hirayama T: A study of the epidemiology of cancer of the breast. Cancer 13: 559–601, 1960

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bonser GM, Dossett JA, Jull JW: Human and Experimental Breast Cancer. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1961, pp 316–363

    Google Scholar 

  13. Russo J, Tay LK, Russo IH: Differentiation of the mammary gland and susceptibility to carcinogenesis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2: 5–73, 1982

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Russo IH, Russo J: Developmental stage of the rat mammary gland as determinant of its susceptibility to 7,12-dimethylbenz(a) anthracene. J Natl Cancer Inst 61: 1439–1449, 1978

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Russo J, Russo IH: DNA labeling index and structure of the rat mammary gland as determinants of its susceptibility to carcinogenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst 61: 1451–1459, 1978

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Russo J, Wilgus G, Russo IH: Susceptibility of the mammary gland to carcinogenesis. Differentiation of the mammary gland as determinant of tumor incidence and type of lesion. Am J Pathol 96: 721–736, 1979

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Russo J, Russo IH: Influence of differentiation and cell kinetics on the susceptibility of the rat mammary gland to carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 40: 2677–2687, 1980

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Russo J, Russo IH: Susceptibility of the mammary gland to carcinogenesis, II. Pregnancy interruption as a risk factor in tumor incidence. Am J Pathol 100: 497–511, 1980

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Russo J, Wilgus G, Tait L, Russo IH: Influence of age and parity on the susceptibility of rat mammary gland epithelial cells in primary cultures to 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene. In Vitro 17: 877–884, 1981

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Russo J, Russo IH: Is differentiation the answer to breast cancer prevention? IRCS Med Sci 10: 935–941, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wellings SR, Jensen HM, Marcum RG: An atlas of subgross pathology of the human breast with special reference to possible precancerous lesions. J Natl Cancer Inst 55: 231–275, 1975

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Neter J, Wasserman W: Applied linear statistical models. In: Irwin RO (ed). Homewood IL, 1974, pp 722–754

  23. Monaghan P, Perusinghe NP, Cowen P, Gusterson BA: Peripubertal human breast development. Anat Record 226: 501–508, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  24. Prechtel K: Mastopathie und altersabhängige Brustdrüsenveränderungen. Fortschr Med 89: 1312–1315, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hutson SW, Cowen PN, Bird CC: Morphologic studies of age-related changes in normal human breast and their significance to evolution of mammary cancer. J Clin Pathol 38: 281–287, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Meyer JS: Cell proliferation in normal human breast ducts, fibroadenomas, and other ductal hyperplasias as measured by tritiated thymidine: effects of menstrual phase, age and oral contraceptive hormones. Human Pathol 8: 67–81, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  27. Page DL, Anderson TJ: Diagnostic Histopathology of Breast. Churchill Livingstone, New York, 1987, p 22

    Google Scholar 

  28. Russo J, Mills MJ, Moussalli MJ, Russo IH: Influence of human breast development on the growth properties of primary cultures. In Vitro Cell Develop Biol 25: 643–649, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  29. Levin ML, Sheehe PR, Graham S, Glidewell O: Lactation and menstrual function as related to cancer of the breast. Am J Public Health 54: 580–587, 1964

    Google Scholar 

  30. Russo J, Calaf G, Roi L, Russo IH: Influence of age and reproductive history on cell kinetics of normal human breast tissuesin vitro. J Natl Cancer Inst 78: 413–418, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Russo J, Russo IH: Biological and molecular bases of mammary carcinogenesis. Lab Invest 57: 112–137, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Russo IH, Calaf G, Russo J: Hormones and proliferative activity in breast tissue. In: Stoll BA (ed) Approaches to Breast Cancer Prevention. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1990, pp 35–51

    Google Scholar 

  33. Russo IH, Koszalka M, Russo J: Human chorionic gonadotropin and rat mammary cancer prevention. J Natl Cancer Inst 82: 1286–1289, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Russo IH, Koszalka M, Russo J: Comparative study of the influence of pregnancy and hormonal treatment on mammary carcinogenesis. Br J Cancer 64: 481–484, 1991

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pathology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 7701 Burholme Avenue, 19111, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    J. Russo, R. Rivera & I. H. Russo

Authors
  1. J. Russo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Rivera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. I. H. Russo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Russo, J., Rivera, R. & Russo, I.H. Influence of age and parity on the development of the human breast. Breast Cancer Res Tr 23, 211–218 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01833517

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01833517

Key words

Search

Navigation