Skip to main content
Log in

Noninvasive methods of bone-mass measurement

  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The most widely used noninvasive methods of bone mass measurement include: single photon absorptiometry (SPA), quantitative computed tomography (QCT), dual photon absorptiometry (DPA and DEXA). SPA is used to measure bone mineral content (BMC) of the distal radius. Its advantages are low cost and high precision in vivo (<2%), however, correlation between axial and appendicular bone values is poor. Since vertebral fracture is the first complication of osteoporosis, spinal values are the most useful. QCT measurements are performed using available CT scanners and either single or dual energy scanning techniques, computed radiographs for localizing regions-of-interest (ROI) and mineral reference standards for calibration. The advantage of QCT is that it can evaluate pure trabecular bone at the midplane of two to four lumbar vertebral bodies. Single energy in vivo reproducibility is 2–5% in osteoporotics. Radiation exposure with most systems is 100–500 mRem. With DPA scanners, the commonest radiation source used is Gadolinium-153 (44–100keV). The areas of measurement are lumbar vertebrae L2, L3 and L4 and the femoral neck. In vivo lumbar measurement precision is at least 1–2% and radiation exposure is low (< 10 mRem). DEXA scanners use an X-ray rather than gamma ray source to emit dual energy photons. The advantages of the technique are shorter scan time, lower radiation exposure (< 3 mRem) and higher precision (< 1 %). In conclusion, measurement of vertebral bone, particularly using DPA and DEXA, is of value in assessing the risk of osteoporosis and in monitoring changes in bone mineral content.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goodwin, P.N. Methodologies for the measurement of bone density and their precision and accuracy. Semin Nuclear Med 1987, 17, 293–304.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Reinbold, W-D, Genant, H.K., Reiser, U.J., Harris, S.T., Ettinger, B. Bone mineral content in early-postmenopausal and postmenopausal osteoporotic women: comparison of measurement methods. Radiology 1986, 160, 469–478.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Genant, H.K., Block, J.E., Steiger, P., Glueer, C. C., Smith, R. Quantitative computed tomography in assessment of osteoporosis. Semin Nuclear Med 1987, 17, 316–333.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mazess, R.B. Errors in measuring trabecular bone by computed tomography due to marrow and bone composition. Calcif Tissue Int 1983, 35, 148–152.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Laval-Jeantet, A.M., Laval-Jeantet, M., Roger, B., Scott, C., Delmas, P.F. Interet et limites de la mesure tomodensitometrique de la mineralisation vertebrale. J Radiol (Paris) 1984, 65, 151–157.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Krolner, B., Nielsen, P.S. Measurement of bone mineral content (BMC) of the lumbar spine. I. Theory and application of a new two-dimensional dual photon attenuation method. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1980, 40, 653–660.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sabatier, J.P., Heron, J.F., Petiot, J.F., Bouvard, G., Dallet, J., Lefevre, J., Ledard, B. Absorptiometrie osseuse vertebrale, presentation d'un prototype d'exploration. J Biophys Med nucl 1983, 7, 139–144.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sabatier, J.P., Guaydier-Souquieres, G., Courtheoux, F., Rivaton, F., Loyau, G. L'absorptiometrie biphotonique rachidienne. Rev Rhum 1985, 52, 685–688.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schaadt, O., Bohr, H. Different trends of age-related diminution of bone mineral content in the lumbar spine, femoral neck and femoral shaft in women. Calcif Tissue Int 1988, 42, 71–76.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eriksson, S.A.V., Widhe, T.L. Bone mass in women with hip fracture. Acta Orthop Scand 1988, 59, 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mazess, R.B., Sorenson, J.A., Hanson, J.A. Performance of an X-ray dual-photon scanner. Presented at Second International Workshop on Non-invasive. Bone Measurements, Leuven, Belgium, September 1987.

  12. Sartoris, D.J., Stein, J.A., Ramos, E., Lambiase, R., Ho, C., Andre, M., Resnick, D. Quantitative dual-energy digital radiography of the spine: comparison to dual-photon absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography. Presented at Sixth International Workshop on Bone and Soft Tissue Densitometry, Buxton, Derbyshire, England, September 1987.

  13. Sartoris, D.J., Resnick, D. Digital radiography spark renewal of bone densitometry. Diagnostic Imaging, January 1988, 145–150.

  14. Wasserman, S.H.S., Barzel, U.S. Osteoporosis: The state of the art in 1987: A review. Semin Nuclear Med 1987, 17, 283–292.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jones, C.D., Laval-Jeantet, A.M., Laval-Jeantet, M., Genant, H.K. Importance of measurement of spongious vertebral bone mineral density in the assessment of osteoporosis. Bone 1987, 8, 201–206.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sabatier, J.P., Guaydier-Souquieres, G. Noninvasive methods of bone-mass measurement. Clin Rheumatol 8 (Suppl 2), 41–45 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02207232

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02207232

Key words

Navigation