Skip to main content
Log in

Body size, male aggression, and male mating success in the cottonwood borer,Plectrodera scalator (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The natural history and mating system ofPlectrodera scalator exhibit several unusual characteristics. Larvae and adults feed on the wood and foliage, respectively, of the same plant,Populus deltoides. The population sex ratio, based on censuses of oviposition areas, is female-biased. Females are significantly larger than males, yet males are intensely aggressive. Larger males tend to win escalated battles, which involve grasping of antennae with mandibles, but smaller males can defeat larger males if they grasp their opponent's antenna first. Most escalated fights involve possession of a female, but prior possession does not play a role in determining the outcome of these fights. The size-dependent fighting advantage does not translate into a mating advantage for larger males. There is no significant difference in elytron length or body mass between mating and single males. Larger females are not preferred as mates. The mating system appears to be a mixture of female-defense and scramble-competition tactics. One advantage to males of aggression may be in its effect on sperm precedence. Males appear to be able to remove previously deposited sperm from a female's reproductive tract.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcock, J. (1980). Natural selection and the mating systems of solitary bees.Am. Sci. 68: 146–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcock, J. (1991). Adaptive mate-guarding by males ofOntholestes cingulatus (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae).J. Insect Behav. 4: 763–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcock, J. (1995). Body size and its effect on male-male competition inHylaeus alcyoneus (Hymenoptera: Colletidae).J. Insect Behav. 8: 149–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcock, J., and Houston, T. F. (1987). Resource defense and alternative mating tactics in the banksia bee,Hylaeus alcyoneus (Erichson).Ethology 76: 177–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcock, J., Jones, C. E., and Buchmann, S. L. (1977). Male mating strategies in the beeCentris pallida Fox (Anthophoridae: Hymenoptera).Am. Nat. 111: 145–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, J. L. (1992). Scramble competition polygyny in the milkweed leaf beetle: Combat, mobility, and the importance of being there.Behav. Ecol. 3: 32–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodson, G., and Marshall, L. (1984). Mating patterns in an ambush bugPhymata fasciata (Phymatidae).Am. Midl. Nat. 112: 50–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodson, G., and Yeates, D. (1990). The mating system of a bee fly (Diptera: Bombyliidae). II. Factors affecting male territorial mating success.J. Insect Behav. 5: 619–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, S. T., and Oring, L. W. (1977). Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems.Science 197: 215–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, S. K. (1987). The mating system and alternative reproductive behaviors ofDendrobias mandibularis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 20: 111–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, S. K. (1989). Feeding ecology and the mating system ofStenaspis verticalis arizonicus Casey (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae).J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 62: 528–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, S. K., and Alcock, J. (1993). The mating chances of small males of the cerambycid beetleTrachyderes mandibularis differ in different environments.J. Insect Behav. 6: 351–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, S., Kilgore, J. A., and Trimble, A. (1996). Gross and microscopic anatomy of the reproductive tracts of males and females ofPlectrodera scalator, the cottonwood borer (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) (in preparation).

  • Greenfield, M. D., Shelly, T. E., and Downum, K. R. (1987). Variation in host-plant quality: Implications for territoriality in a desert grasshopper.Ecology 68: 828–838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwynne, D. (1980). Female defence polygyny in the bumblebee wolf,Philanthus bicinctus (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 7: 213–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastings, J. M., Dodson, G. N., and Heckman, J. L. (1994). Male perch selection and the mating system of the robber fly,Promachus albifacies (Diptera: Asilidae).J. Insect Behav. 7: 829–841.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juliano, S. (1985). The effects of body size on mating and reproduction inBrachinus lateralis (Coleoptera: Carabidae).Ecol. Entomol. 10: 271–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, F. K., and Kustvall, V. (1990). Temperature reverses size-dependent male mating success of a cerambycid beetle.Funct. Ecol. 4: 85–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linsley, E. G., and Chemsak, J. A. (1984).The Cerambycidae of North America, Part VII, No. I: Taxonomy and Classification of the Subfamily Lamiinae, Tribes Parmenini Through Acanthoderini, University of California Publications in Entomology, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marden, J. H., and Waage, J. K. (1990). Escalated damselfly territorial contests are energetic wars of attrition.Anim. Behav. 39: 954–959.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLain, D. K. (1984). Host plant density and territorial behavior of the seed bug,Neacoryphus bicrucis (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 14: 181–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neill, K. M. (1983). The significance of body size in territorial interactions of male beewolves (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae,Philanthus).Anim. Behav. 31: 404–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neill, K. M., Evans, H. E., and O'Neill, R. P. (1989). Phenotypic correlates of mating success in the sand waspBembecinus quinquespinosus (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae).Can. J. Zool. 67: 2557–2568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, J. L. (1994). The influence of horn and body size on the reproductive behavior of the horned rainbow scarab beetlePhanaeus difformis (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae).J. Insect Behav. 7: 67–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwagmeyer, P. L., and Woontner, S. J. (1986). Scramble competition polygyny in thirteen-lined ground squirrels; The relative contributions of overt conflict and competitive mate searching.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19: 359–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., and Alcock, J. (1983).The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trimble, A., and Goldsmith, S. (1996). Oviposition behavior and fecundity in females of the cottonwood borer (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) (in preparation).

  • Villalobos, E. M., and Shelly, T. E. (1991). Correlates of male mating success in two species ofAnthidium bees (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 29: 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goldsmith, S.K., Stewart, Z., Adams, S. et al. Body size, male aggression, and male mating success in the cottonwood borer,Plectrodera scalator (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). J Insect Behav 9, 719–727 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02213552

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02213552

Key Words

Navigation