Skip to main content
Log in

A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In view of the current level of knowledge and the numerous treatment possibilities, none of the existing classification systems of thoracic and lumbar injuries is completely satisfactory. As a result of more than a decade of consideration of the subject matter and a review of 1445 consecutive thoracolumbar injuries, a comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries is proposed. The classification is primarily based on pathomorphological criteria. Categories are established according to the main mechanism of injury, pathomorphological uniformity, and in consideration of prognostic aspects regarding healing potential. The classification reflects a progressive scale of morphological damage by which the degree of instability is determined. The severity of the injury in terms of instability is expressed by its ranking within the classification system. A simple grid, the 3-3-3 scheme of the AO fracture classification, was used in grouping the injuries. This grid consists of three types: A, B, and C. Every type has three groups, each of which contains three subgroups with specifications. The types have a fundamental injury pattern which is determined by the three most important mechanisms acting on the spine: compression, distraction, and axial torque. Type A (vertebral body compression) focuses on injury patterns of the vertebral body. Type B injuries (anterior and posterior element injuries with distraction) are characterized by transverse disruption either anteriorly or posteriorly. Type C lesions (anterior and posterior element injuries with rotation) describe injury patterns resulting from axial torque. The latter are most often superimposed on either type A or type B lesions. Morphological criteria are predominantly used for further subdivision of the injuries. Severity progresses from type A through type C as well as within the types, groups, and further subdivisions. The 1445 cases were analyzed with regard to the level of the main injury, the frequency of types and groups, and the incidence of neurological deficit. Most injuries occurred around the thoracolumbar junction. The upper and lower end of the thoracolumbar spine and the T 10 level were most infrequently injured. Type A fractures were found in 66.1 %, type B in 14.5%, and type C in 19.4% of the cases. Stable type Al fractures accounted for 34.7% of the total. Some injury patterns are typical for certain sections of the thoracolumbar spine and others for age groups. The neurological deficit, ranging from complete paraplegia to a single root lesion, was evaluated in 1212 cases. The overall incidence was 22% and increased significantly from type to type: neurological deficit was present in 14% of type A, 32% of type B, and 55% of type C lesions. Only 2% of the Al and 4% of the A2 fractures showed any neurological deficit. The classification is comprehensive as almost any injury can be itemized according to easily recognizable and consistent radiographic and clinical findings. Every injury can be defined alphanumerically or by a descriptive name. The classification can, however, also be used in an abbreviated form without impairment of the information most important for clinical practice. Identification of the fundamental nature of an injury is facilitated by a simple algorithm. Recognizing the nature of the injury, its degree of instability, and prognostic aspects are decisive for the choice of the most appropriate treatment. Experience has shown that the new classification is especially useful in this respect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arciero R, Leung K, Pierce J (1989) Spontaneous unstable burst fracture of the thoracolumbar spine in osteoporosis. Spine 14:114–117

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Boger DC, Chandler RW, Pierce JG, Balciunas A (1983) Unilateral facet dislocation at the lumbosacral junction. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 65:1174–1178

    Google Scholar 

  3. Böhler L (1951) Die Technik der Knochenbruchbehandlung, 12–13 edn. vol 1. Maudrich, Vienna, pp 318–480

  4. Böhler J (1983) Bilanz der konservativen und operativen Knochenbruchbehandlung — Becken und Wirbelsäule. Chirurg 54:241–247

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chance CQ (1948) Note on a type of flexion fracture of the spine. Br J Radiol 21:452–453

    Google Scholar 

  6. Conolly PJ, Esses StI, Heggeness MH, Cook StS (1992) Unilateral facet dislocation of the lumbosacral junction. Spine 17:1244–1248

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. De Oliviera J (1978) A new type of fracture-dislocation of the thoracolumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 60:481–488

    Google Scholar 

  8. Delplace J, Tricoit M, Sillion D, Vialla JF (1983) Luxation postérieure de L5 sur le sacrum. A propos d'un cas. Rev Chir Orthop 69:141–145

    Google Scholar 

  9. Denis F (1982) Updated classification of thoracolumbar fractures. Orthop Trans 6:8–9

    Google Scholar 

  10. Denis F (1983) The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine 8:817–831

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Denis F (1984) Spinal instability as defined by the three-column spine concept in acute spinal trauma. Clin Orthop 189:65–76

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Denis F, Burkus JK (1991) Lateral distraction injuries to the thoracic and lumbar spine. A report of three cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 73:1049–1053

    Google Scholar 

  13. Denis F, Burkus JK (1991) Diagnosis and treatment of cauda equina entrapment in the vertical lamina fracture of lumbar burst fractures. Spine (Suppl) 16:433–439

    Google Scholar 

  14. Denis F, Burkus JK (1992) Shear fracture dislocation of the thoracic and lumbar spine associated with forceful hyperextension (lumberjack paraplegia). Spine 17:156–161

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferguson RL, Allen BL Jr (1984) A mechanistic classification of thoracolumbar spine fractures. Clin Orthop 189:77–88

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fuentes JM, Bloncourt J, Bourbotte G, Castan P, Vlahovitch B (1984) La fracture du chance. Neurochirurgie 30:113–118

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gertzbein SD, Court-Brown CM (1988) Flexion/distraction injuries of the lumbar spine. Mechanisms of injury and classification. Clin Orthop 227:52–60

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gertzbein SD, Court-Brown CM (1989) The rationale for management of flexion/distraction injuries of the thoracolumbar spine, based on a new classification. J Spinal Disord 2:176–183

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gertzbein SD, Offierski C (1979) Complete fracture-dislocation of the thoracic spine without spinal cord injury. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 61:449–451

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gumley G, Taylor TKF, Ryan MD (1982) Distraction fractures of the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 64:520–525

    Google Scholar 

  21. Holdsworth FW (1963) Fractures, dislocations, and fracturedislocations of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 45:6–20

    Google Scholar 

  22. Holdsworth FW (1970) Review article: fractures, dislocations, and fracture-dislocations of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 52:1534–1551

    Google Scholar 

  23. Howland WJ, Curry JL, Buffington CD (1965) Fulcrum injuries of the lumbar spine. JAMA 193:240–241

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jeanneret B, Ward J-C, Magerl F (1993) Pincer fractures: a therapeutic quandary. Rev Chir Orthop 79 (Special): Abstract 38

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jeanneret B, Ho PK, Magerl F (1993) “Burst-shear” flexion/distraction injuries of the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord 6:473–481

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lindahl S, Willén J, Norwall A, Irstam L (1983) The crushcleavage fracture. A “new” thoracolumbar unstable fracture. Spine 8:559–569

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lob A (1954) Die Wirbelsäulen-Verletzungen und ihre Ausheilung. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  28. Louis R (1977) Les théories de l'instabilité. Rev Chir Orthop 63:423–425

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Magerl F, Harms J, Gertzbein SD, Aebi M, Nazarian S (1990) A new classification of spinal fractures. Presented at the Societé Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie (SICOT) Meeting, Montreal, September 9, 1990

  30. Maruo S, Tatekawa F, Nakano K (1987) Paraplegic infolge von Wirbelkompressionsfrakturen bei seniler Osteoporose. Z Orthop 125:320–323

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. McAfee PC, Yuan HA, Fredrickson BE, Lubicky JP (1983) The value of computed tomography in thoracolumbar fractures. An analysis of one hundred consecutive cases and a new classification. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 65:461–479

    Google Scholar 

  32. Müller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P (1987) Classification AO des fractures. 1 Les os longs. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nicoll EA (1949) Fractures of the dorso-lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 31:376–394

    Google Scholar 

  34. Powell J, Waddell J, Tucker W, Transfeldt E (1989) Multiplelevel noncontiguous spinal fractures. J Trauma 29:1146–1150

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rennie W, Mitchell N (1973) Flexion distraction injuries of the thoracolumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 55:386–390

    Google Scholar 

  36. Roy-Camille R, Saillant G (1984) Les traumatismes du rachis sans complication neurologique. Int Orthop 8:155–162

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Berteaux D, Marie-Anne S (1979) Early management of spinal injuries. In: McKibbin B (ed) Recent advances in orthopaedics 3. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 57–87

    Google Scholar 

  38. Roy-Camille R, Gagnon P, Catonne Y, Benazet JB (1980) La luxation antéro-latérale du rachis lombo-sacré. Rev Chir Orthop 66:105–109

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Salomon C, Chopin D, Benoist M (1988) Spinal cord compression: an exceptional complication of spinal osteoporosis. Spine 13:222–224

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sasson A, Mozes G (1987) Complete fracture-dislocation of the thoracic spine without neurologic deficit. A case report. Spine 12:67–70

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Shikata J, Yamamuro T, Iida H, Shimizu K, Yoshikawa J (1990) Surgical treatment for paraplegia resulting from vertebral fractures in senile osteoporosis. Spine 15:485–489

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Simpson AHRW, Williamson DM, Golding SJ, Houghton GR (1990) Thoracic spine translocation without cord injury. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 72:80–83

    Google Scholar 

  43. Smith WS, Kaner H (1969) Patterns and mechanics of lumbar injuries associated with lap seat belts. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 51:239–254

    Google Scholar 

  44. Trojan E (1972) Langfristige Ergebnisse von 200 Wirbelbrüchen der Brust- und Lendenwirbelsdule ohne Ldhmung. Z Unfallmed Berufskr 65:122–134

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. White AA III, Panjabi MM (1978) Clinical biomechanics of the spine. Lippincott, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  46. Whitesides TE Jr (1977) Traumatic kyphosis of the thoracolumbar spine. Clin Orthop 128:78–92

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Willems MHA, Braakman R, Van Linge B (1984) Bilateral locked facets in the thoracic spine. Acta Orthop Scand 55:300–303

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Willén J, Lindahl S, Irstam L, Aldman B, Norwall A (1984) The thoracolumbar crush fracture. An experimental study on instant axial dynamic loading: the resulting fracture type and its instability. Spine 9:624–630

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Magerl, F., Aebi, M., Gertzbein, S.D. et al. A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J 3, 184–201 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02221591

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02221591

Key words

Navigation