Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of scopolamine on learning and memory in monkeys

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of scopolamine were evaluated in monkeys responding under operant procedures designed to evaluate drug effects on learning and memory. In one procedure, responding was maintained by food presentation under a multiple schedule. One component of the multiple schedule was a repeated-acquisition task in which the discriminative stimuli for left- and right-key responses changed each session (learning). In the other component, the discriminative stimuli for responses were the same each session (performance). In both components of the multiple schedule, scopolamine produced dose-related decreases in responding; there was little evidence of differential rate-decreasing effects between components. Percent errors in learning were increased in a dose-related manner, whereas percent errors in performance were generally unaffected except at high doses, which also produced substantial decreases in response rate. These results suggest that acquisition is more sensitive to the disruptive effects of scopolamine than is performance. The second procedure utilized repeated acquisition and delayed performance as a technique to study the effects of scopolamine on memory. In this procedure, each session was divided into three phases: acquisition, delay and performance. After a 24-h delay, scopolamine had little or no effect on retention, accuracy or rate of responding. In contrast, after a 60-min delay, scopolamine decreased retention in a dose-related manner. These data suggest that scopolamine produces a greater disruptive effect on short (60-min) versus long (24-h) delays.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aigner TG, Mishkin M (1986) The effects of physostigmine and scopolamine on recognition memory in monkeys. Behav Neural Biol 45:81–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Alpern HP, Marriott JG (1973) Short-term memory: Facilitation and disruption with cholinergic agents. Physiol Behav 11:571–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartus R, Johnson H (1976) Short-term memory in the rhesus monkey: disruption from the anticholinergic scopolamine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 5:39–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartus RT, Dean RL, Beer B, Lippa AS (1982) The cholinergic hypothesis of geriatric memory dysfunction. Science 217:408–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohdanecky Z, Jarvik ME, Carley JL (1967) Differential impairment of delayed matching in monkeys by scopolamine and scopolamine methylbromide. Psychopharmacologia 11:293–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH (1990) Atropine, scopolamine and related antimuscarinic drugs. In: Gilman AG, Rall TW, Nies AS, Taylor P (eds) The pharmacological basis of therapeutics, 8th edn. Macmillan, New York, pp 150–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn J, Ziriax JM, Cox C, Cory-Slechta DA (1992) Comparison of error patterns produced by scopolamine and MK-801 on repeated acquisition and transition baselines. Psychopharmacology 107:243–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle JT, Price DL, DeLong MR (1983) Alzheimer's disease: a disorder of cortical cholinergic innervation. Science 219:1184–1190

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans HL (1975) Scopolamine effects on visual discrimination: modifications related to stimulus control. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 195:105–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Growdon JH (1992) Treatment for Alzheimer's disease? N Engl J Med 327:1306–1308

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins ST, Woodward BM, Henningfield JE (1989) Effects of atropine on the repeated acquisition and performance on response sequences in humans. J Exp Anal Behav 51:5–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard JL, Pollard GT (1983) Effects ofd-amphetamine, org 2766, scopolamine, and physostigmine on repeated acquisition of four-response chains in the rat. Drug Dev Res 3:37–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudzig TJ, Wenger GR (1993) Effects of drugs of abuse and cholinergic agents on delayed matching-to-sample responding in the squirrel monkey. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 265:120–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Izquierdo I (1989) Mechanism of action of scopolamine as an amnestic. Trends Pharmacol Sci 10:175–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Moerschbaecher JM, Thompson DM (1980) Effects of phencyclidine, pentobarbital, and d-amphetamine on the acquisition and performance of conditional discriminations in monkeys. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 13:887–894

    Google Scholar 

  • Moerschbaecher JM, Thompson DM (1983) Differential effects of prototype opioid agonists on the acquisition of conditional discriminations in monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 226:738–748

    Google Scholar 

  • Moerschbaecher JM, Thompson D, Thomas JR (1979) Effects of methamphetamine and scopolamine on variability of response location. J Exp Anal Behav 32:255–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Pakarinen ED, Moerschbaecher JM (1993) Comparison of the effects of scopolamine and methscopolamine on the performance of a fixed-ratio discrimination in squirrel monkeys. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 44:815–819

    Google Scholar 

  • Pakarinen ED, Moerschbaecher JM (1995) Effects of competitive and noncompetitive GABAA antagonists on the acquisition of a discrimination in squirrel monkeys. Behav Pharmacol 6:156–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Penetar DM (1985) The effects of atropine, benactyzine, and physostigmine on a repeated acquisition baseline in monkeys. Psychopharmacology 87:69–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Quartermain D, Leo P (1988) Strength of scopolamine-induced amnesia as a function of time between training and testing. Behav Neural Biol 50:300–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupniak NMJ, Samson NA, Steventon MJ, Iversen SD (1991a) Induction of cognitive impairment by scopolamine and noncholinergic agents in rhesus monkeys. Life Sci 48:893–899

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupniak NMJ, Samson NA, Tye SJ, Field MJ, Iversen SD (1991b) Evidence against a specific effect of cholinergic drugs on spatial memory in primates. Behav Brain Res 43:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Rush DK (1988) Scopolamine amnesia of passive avoidance: a deficit of information acquisition. Behav Neural Biol 50:255–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon HE, Bemis KG, Hart JC (1990) Assessment of working memory in rats using spatial alteration behavior with variable retention intervals: effects of fixed-ratio size and scopolamine. Psychopharmacology 100:491–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson DM (1975) Repeated acquisition of response sequences: stimulus control and drugs. J Exp Anal Behav 23:429–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson DM, Mastropaolo J, Winsauer PJ, Moerschbaecher JM (1986) Repeated acquisition and delayed performance as a baseline to assess drug effects on retention in monkeys. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 25:201–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger GR (1979) Effects of physostigmine, atropine and scopolamine on behavior maintained by a multiple schedule of food presentation in the mouse. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 209:137–143

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Savage, U.C., Faust, W.B., Lambert, P. et al. Effects of scopolamine on learning and memory in monkeys. Psychopharmacology 123, 9–14 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02246275

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02246275

Key words

Navigation