Skip to main content
Log in

A new five factor model of schizophrenia

  • Published:
Psychiatric Quarterly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Schizophrenic psychopathology is heterogeneous and multidimensional. Various strategies have been developed over the past several years to assess and measure more accurately discrete domains of psychopathology. One of the more fruitful strategies to investigate more homogenous domains of psychopathology has been the positive-negative syndrome approach. However, this approach is unable to address a number of important issues. Most schizophrenics present a mixed syndrome; the criteria for what constitutes a positive and negative syndrome are variable; distinguishing primary from secondary negative symptoms can be difficult. In order to address some of these problems, we propose the introduction of a five syndrome model based on a reanalysis of factor analytic procedures used on 240 schizophrenics assessed with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). We present data on a 5-factor solution which appears to best fit the psychopathological data and which is supported by three independent and comparable factor analyses; negative, positive, excitement, cognitive and depression/anxiety domains of psychopathology give patients their individual mark. Data on internal consistency of the five factors and on initial validation using demographic and clinical variables are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Strauss J, Carpenter WT, Bartko J. The diagnosis and understanding of schizophrenia, III: Speculations on the process that underlie schizophrenic symptoms and signs.Schizophrenia Bulletin 1:61–69, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Crow TJ. Molecular pathology of schizophrenia: More than one disease process?British Medical Journal 260:66–68, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andreasen NC, and Olsen SA. Negative versus positive schizophrenia: Definition and validation.Archives of General Psychiatry 39:789–794, 1982.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kay SR, Opler LA, Fiszbein A. The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia.Schizophrenia Bulletin 13:261–276, 1987.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lindenmayer JP, Kay SR, Opler LA. Positive and negative subtypes in acute schizophrenia.Comprehensive Psychiatry 25:454–464, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carpenter WT, Heinrichs DW, Wagman AM. Deficit and non-deficit forms of schizophrenia: The concept.American Journal of Psychiatry 145:578–583, 1988.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kay SR, Sevy S; Pyramidical model of schizophrenia.Schizophrenia Bulletin 16:537–545, 1990.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ardnt S, Alliger RJ, Andreasen N. The distinction of positive and negative symptoms: The failure of a two-dimensional model.British Journal of Psychiatry 158:317–322, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liddle PF. The symptoms of chronic schizophrenia: A re-examination of the positivenegative dichotomy.British Journal of Psychiatry 151:145–151, 1987.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bilder RM, Mukherjee S, Rieder RO, et al. Symptomatic and neuropsychological components of deficit status.Schizophrenia Bulletin 11:409–419, 1985.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gur RE, Mozley PD, Resnick S, et al. Relations among clinical scales in schizophrenia.American Journal of Psychiatry 148:472–478, 1991.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rummel RJ.Applied factor analysis. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gorsuch RL.Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Coovert MD, McNelis. Determining the number of common factors in factor analysis. A review and program.Educational Psychological Measurement 48:687–692, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS.Using multivariate statistics. New York: HarperCollins, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  16. American Psychiatric Association.Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd Ed, DSM-III). Washington, DC: APA, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bell M, Lysaker P, Millstein R, et al. Pyramidical model of schizophrenia: Factor replication and implications for subtyping. 145th Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC (Poster), 1992.

  18. Lépine JP, Piron JJ, Chapatot E. Factor analysis of the PANSS in schizophrenia patients. In: Psychiatry today: Accomplishments and Promises (eds. Stefanis CN, Soldatos CR, Rabavilas AD). Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lindenmayer JP, Grochowski S, Mabugat L. Clozapine effects on positive and negative symptoms: A six month trial in treatment refractory schizophrenics. J. Clin. Psychopharmacology, 1994 (in press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lindenmayer, JP., Bernstein-Hyman, R. & Grochowski, S. A new five factor model of schizophrenia. Psych Quart 65, 299–322 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354306

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354306

Keywords

Navigation