Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Client typology based on functioning level assessments: Utility for service planning and monitoring

  • Published:
The journal of mental health administration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cluster analysis was used to develop a six-group typology based on level of functioning data from 2,447 clients with serious mental illness served by the Michigan public mental health system. The groups are described in terms of level of functioning in 16 domains, global functioning, diagnosis, demographic characteristics and services used. A group of older, poor functioning clients with high health needs was identified. A second group of highly dysfunctional clients with few health needs was also found. Two groups of young adult “chronic” clients were found: one with extensive substance abuse problems and one with moderate substance abuse problems and extreme levels of suicidal and aggressive behavior. Two groups of relatively good functioning clients were also identified: one with some problems in many areas and a second with functional problems in a number of life areas and pronounced symptoms of depression and demoralization. The results point to the utility of cluster analysis as a mechanism to organize and identify patterns within the rich array of information provided by multidimensional level of functioning assessments. The uses of empirically derived client types in planning and monitoring mental health services are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harding CM, Brooks GW, Ashikaga T, et al.: The Vermont longitudinal study of persons with severe mental illness II: long term outcomes of subjects who retrospectively met DSM-III criteria for schizophrenia.American Journal of Psychiatry 1987; 144:727–735.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tessler RC, Bernstein AG, Rosen BM, et al.: The chronically mentally ill in community support systems.Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1982; 33:208–211.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schwartz SR, Goldfinger SM: The new chronic patient: clinical characteristics of an emerging subgroup.Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1981; 32:470–474.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldman HH, Manderscheid RW: Epidemiology of chronic mental disorder. In: Menninger WW, Hannah GT (eds):The Chronic Mental Patient/II, Washington DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Taube CA, Rosenstein MJ, Rosen BM, et al.: The “chronic” mental hospital patient.Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1983; 34:611–615.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Taube CA, Goldman HH, Burns BJ, et al.: High users of outpatient mental health services I: Definition and characteristics.American Journal of Psychiatry 1988; 145:19–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ellis RH, Wilson NZ, Foster FM: Statewide treatment outcome assessment in Colorado: the Colorado Client Assessment Record (CCAR).Community Mental Health Journal 1984; 20:72–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Toward a Model Plan for a Comprehensive Community-Based Mental Health System. Washington DC: National Institute of Mental Health, 1987.

  9. Bachrach LL: Young adult chronic patients: an analytical review of the literature.Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1982; 33:189–197.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Burnes AJ, Roen SR: Social roles and adaption to the community.Community Mental Health Journal 1967; 3:153–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Minkoff K: A map of chronic mental patients. In Talbott JA (ed):The Chronic Mental Patient. Washington DC: The American Psychiatric Association, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goldman HH, Gattozzi AA, Taube CA: Defining and counting the chronically mentally ill.Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1981; 32:21–27.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Paykel ES: Classification of depressed patients: a cluster analysis derived grouping.British Journal of Psychiatry 1971; 118:273–288.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Blashfield RK, Morey LC: The classification of depression through cluster analysis.Comprehensive Psychiatry 1979; 20:516–527.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lorr M, Pokorny A, Klett CJ: Three depressive types.Journal of Clinical Psychology 1973; 29:290–294.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Andreasen NC, Grove WM, Maurer R: Cluster analysis and the classification of depression.British Journal of Psychiatry 1980; 137:256–265.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Strauss JS, Bartko JJ, Carpenter WT: The use of clustering techniques for the classification of psychiatric patients.British Journal of Psychiatry 1973; 122:531–540.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Williams GW, Barton GM, White AA, et al.: Cluster analysis applied to symptom ratings of psychiatric patients: an evaluation of its predicative ability.British Journal of Psychiatry 1976; 129:178–185.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cyr JJ, Atkinson L, Haley GA: A replicated cluster solution in a heterogeneous psychiatric population.Journal of Clinical Psychology 1986; 42:92–99.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Greenfield AL, Mowbray CT, Freddolino PP, et al.: An empirically derived typology of mentally ill group home residents.Evaluation and Program Planning 1987; 10:273–279.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Braucht GN, Kirby MW: An empirical typology of the chronically mentally ill.Community Mental Health Journal 1986; 22:3–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shern DL, Bartsch DA, Coen AS, et al.:A Model for Estimating Optimal Residential/Service Setting for Types of Chronically Mentally Ill Individuals. Denver CO: Colorado Department of Institutions Division of Mental Health, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Skinner HA, Blashfield RK: Increasing the impact of cluster analysis research: the case of psychiatric classification.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1982; 50:727–735.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Field Test Materials for the Residential Continua Lansing, MI: Michigan Department of Mental Health, 1981.

  25. Derogatis LR, Melisaratos W: The Brief Symptom Inventory: an introductory report.Psychological Medicine 1983; 13:595–605.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Schneider LE, Struening EL: SLOF: a behavioral rating scale for assessing the mentally ill.Social Work Research and Abstractions 1983; 2:9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Weissman MM: The assessment of social adjustment.Archives of General Psychiatry 1975; 32:357–365.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Curren JP, Miller IW, Zwick WR, et al.: The socially inadequate patient: incidence rate demographic and clinical features and hospital and post-hospital functioning.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1980; 48:375–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Viet CT, Ware JE: The structure of psychological distress and well-being in general populations.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1983; 51:730–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hogarty GE, Katz MM: Norms of adjustment and social behavior. Archives of General Psychiatry 1971; 25:470–480.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Endicott J, Spitzer RL, Fleiss JL, et al.: The Global Assessment Scale: a procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance.Archives of General Psychiatry 1976; 33:766–771.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Fleiss, JL:Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.), New York: John Wiley, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Stein LI, Test MA: Alternative to mental hospital treatment.Archives of General Psychiatry 1980; 37:392–412.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Sneath P, Sokal R:Numerical Taxonomy. San Francisco: Freeman, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  35. SPSS-X, Chicago: SPSS, 1986.

  36. Ward JH: Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function.Journal of the American Statistical Association 1963; 58:236–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Blashfield RK, Aldenderfer MS: The literature on cluster analysis.Multivariate Behavioral Research 1978; 13:271–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Aldenderfer MS, Blashfield RK:Cluster Analysis, Beverly Hills CA: Sage, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hazel KL, Herman SE, Mowbray CT: Characteristics of adults with serious mental illness in a public mental health system.Hospital and Community Psychiatry. In press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Services Research Division, Michigan Department of Mental Health, Lewis Cass Building, 48913, Lansing, MI

    Sandra E. Herman Ph.D. (Acting Director)

  2. School of Social Work, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan

    Carol T. Mowbray Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Sandra E. Herman Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carol T. Mowbray Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This research was funded, in part, by Grant SRC-S 1 H84 MH41381-01 from the National Institute of Mental Health, Department of Health and Human Services. We thank Richard Amdur, Pam Blondin, Scott Cohen and Kelly Hazel for their work on the project.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herman, S.E., Mowbray, C.T. Client typology based on functioning level assessments: Utility for service planning and monitoring. The Journal of Mental Health Administration 18, 101–115 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02518604

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02518604

Keywords

Search

Navigation