Skip to main content
Log in

Compliance with the recommendations of medical consultants

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Compliance with the consultant’s recommendations is one measure of the effectiveness of a consultation. A previous study showed that compliance was better when fewer recommendations were made. In the subsequent year, consultants were encouraged to limit their recommendations to five or fewer. Despite a significant decrease in the number of recommendations, compliance rates remained essentially unchanged (72%). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the clinical severity of the patient’s disease and the number of associated problems, as well as the types of recommendations, were significant predictors of compliance. Compliance was best for recommendations involving medications (84%) and worst for recommendations involving diagnostic tests (62%). Compliance was also evaluated in the context of a surgeon’s view of the appropriateness of the recommendations. For recommendations felt to be essential to patient care the compliance rate was 75%, but it was only 44% for recommendations judged non-essential (p<0.001). The consulting internist should be aware that the surgeon’s view of the relevance of the recommendations to patient care needs may have an important effect on compliance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sears CS, Charlson ME. The effectiveness of consultation: compliance with initial recommendations. Am J Med 1983;74:870–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Statistical analysis system. Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute, 1980

  3. Vandam LD. To make the patient ready for surgery, Menlo Park, California: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1980

    Google Scholar 

  4. American College of Surgeons. Manual of preoperative and postoperative care, 1982

  5. Lubin MF, Walker K, Smith RB. Medical management of the surgical patient. Woburn, Massachusetts, Butterworths Publishers, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goldman DR, Brown FH, Levy WK, Slap GB, Sussman EJ. Medical care of the surgical patient. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  7. Molitch ME. Management of medical problems in surgical patients. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stevens AJ, Preparation for anesthesia. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lee T, Pappius EM, Goldman L. Impact of inter physician communication and the effectiveness of medical consultation. Am J Med 1983;74:106–112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Horwitz RI, Henes CG, Horwitz SM. Developing strategies for improving diagnostic and management efficacy of medical consultations. J Chron Dis 1983;36:213–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received from the Departments of Medicine and Surgery, Cornell University Medical College, New York, New York. Dr. Ballard was a Henry J. Kaiser Foundation Fellow in General Internal Medicine. Dr. Gold is a Fellow in Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Dr. Charlson is a Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation Faculty Scholar in General Internal Medicine.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ballard, W.P., Gold, J.P. & Charlson, M.E. Compliance with the recommendations of medical consultants. J Gen Intern Med 1, 220–224 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02596186

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02596186

Key words

Navigation