Skip to main content
Log in

Requiring physicians to respond to computerized reminders improves their compliance with preventive care protocols

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To improve compliance with computer-generated reminders to perform fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), mammography, and cervical Papanicolaou (Pap) testing.

Design: Six-month prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Setting: Academic primary care general internal medicine practice.

Subjects: Thirty-one general internal medicine faculty, 145 residents, and 5,407 patients with scheduled visits who were eligible for any of the three cancer screening protocols.

Intervention: Primary care teams of internal medicine residents and faculty received either routine computer reminders (control) or the same reminders to which they were required to circle one of four responses: 1) “done/order today,” 2) “not applicable to this patient,” 3) “patient refused,” or 4) “next visit.”

Results: Intervention physicians complied more frequently than control physicians with all reminders combined (46% vs 38%, respectively, p=0.002) and separately with reminders for FOBT (61% vs 49%, p=0.0007) and mammography (54% vs 47%, p=0.036) but not cervical Pap testing (21% vs 18%, p=0.2). Intervention residents responded significantly more often than control residents to all reminders together and separately to reminders for FOBT and mammography but not Pap testing. There was no significant difference between intervention and control faculty, but the compliance rate for control faculty was significantly higher than the rate for control residents for all reminders together and separately for FOBT but not mammography or Pap testing. The intervention’s effect was greatest for patients ≥70 years old, with significant results for all tests, together and singly, for residents but not faculty. Intervention physicians felt that the reminders were not applicable 21% of the time (due to inadequate data in patients’ electronic medical records) and stated that their patients refused 10% of the time.

Conclusions: Requiring physicians to respond to computer-generated reminders improved their compliance with preventive care protocols, especially for elderly patients for whom control physicians’ compliance was the lowest. However, 100% compliance with cancer screening reminders will be unattainable due to incomplete data and patient refusal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McDonald CJ, Hui SL, Smith DM, Tierney WM, et al. Reminders to physicians from an introspective computer medical record. A two-year randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 1984;100:130–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Woo B, Woo B, Cook EF, Weisberg M, Goldman L. Screening procedures in the asymptomatic adult: comparison of physicians’ recommendations, patients’ desires, published guidelines, and actual practice. JAMA. 1985;254:1480–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Barnett GO, Winickoff RN. Quality assurance and computer-based patient records. Am J Public Health. 1990;80:527–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Buff KR, Kaufman L, Thomas JP (eds). Handbook of Perception and Human Performance. Vol. II, Cognitive Processes and Performance. New York: John Wiley, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Frame PS, Kowulich BA, Llewellyn AM. Improving physician compliance with a Health Maintenance Protocol. J Fam Pract. 1984;19:341–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen DI, Littenberg B, Wetzel C, Neuhauser DB. Improving physician compliance with preventive care guidelines. Med Care. 1982;20:1040–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cheney C, Ramsdell JW. Effect of medical records’ checklist on implementation of periodic health measures. Am J Med. 1987;83:129–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tierney WM, Hui SL, McDonald CJ. Delayed feedback of physician performance versus immediate reminders to perform preventive care: effects on physician compliance. Med Care. 1986;24:659–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. McDonald CJ. Action-Oriented Decision in Ambulatory Medicine. Chicago: Year Book, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tierney WM, Miller ME, Hui SL, McDonald CJ. Practice randomization and clinical research: the Indiana experience. Med Care. 1991;29(suppl):JS57-JS64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. McDonald CJ, Blevins L, Tierney WM, Martin DK. The Regenstrief Medical Records. MD Comput. 1988;5:34–47.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. The periodic health examination. Can Med Assoc J. 1979;121:1193–254.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. The periodic health examination 2. 1985 update. Can Med Assoc J. 1985;134:724–9.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Breslow L, Somers AR. The lifetime Health Monitoring program: a practical approach to preventive medicine. N Eng J Med. 1977;296:601–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. American Cancer Society. Guidelines for the cancer-related check-up, recommendations, and rationale. CA Cancer J Clin. 1985;35:199.

    Google Scholar 

  16. American Cancer Society. Change in American Cancer Society check-up guidelines for detection of cervical cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 1988;38:127–8.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Love RR, Rodnick JE, McPhee SJ. Community models for cancer prevention and detection. CA Cancer J Clin. 1988;62:1815–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tierney WM, Miller ME, McDonald CJ. The effect on test ordering of informing physicians of the charges for outpatient diagnostic tests. N Engl J Med. 1990;233:1499–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Litzelman DK, Dittus RS, Dame MA, Tierney WM. Barriers to preventive care. Clin Res. 1990;38:717A.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tierney WM, McDonald CJ, Martin DK, Hui SL, Rogers MP. Computerized display of past test results: effects on outpatient testing. Ann Intern Med. 1987;107:569–74.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kleinman J. Proportions with extraneous variance: single and independent samples. J Am Stat Assoc. 1973;68:46–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dittus RS, Tierney WM. Scheduling follow-up office visits: physician variability. Clin Res. 1987;35:738A.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Turner BJ, Day SC, Borenstein B. A controlled trial to improve delivery of preventive care: physician or patient reminders? J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4:403–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Shapiro S. Screening for early detection of cancer and heart disease. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1975;51(1):80–95.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mandelblatt J, Gopaul I, Wistreich M. Gynecological care of elderly women. Another look at Papanicolaou smear testing. JAMA. 1986;256:367–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Massachusetts Department of Public Health. Pap testing—are we screening the wrong women? N Engl J Med. 1976;294:223.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hayward RA, Shapiro MF, Freeman HC, Corey CR. Who gets screened for cervical and breast cancer? Results from a new national survey. Arch Intern Med. 1988;148:1177–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Celentano DD, Shapiro S, Weisman C. Cancer preventive screening behavior among elderly women. Prev Med. 1982;11:454–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Margolis KL, Lofgren RP, Korn JE. Organizational strategies to improve influenza vaccine delivery. A standing order in a general medicine clinic. Arch Intern Med. 1988;148:2205–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Nichol KL, Korn JE, Margolis KL, et al. Achieving the national health objective for influenza immunization: success of an institution-wide vaccination program. Am J Med. 1990;89:156–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. McPhee SJ, Bird JA, Fordham D, Rodnick JE, Osborn EH. Promoting cancer prevention activities by primary care physicians. Results of a randomized, controlled trial. JAMA. 1991;266:538–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received from the Regenstrief Institute for Health Care, the Department of Medicine of the Indiana University School of Medicine, and the Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Administration Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Supported by grant number D28-PE55990 from the Health Research Service Administration and grants number HS-04996 and HS-05626 from the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Litzelman, D.K., Dittus, R.S., Miller, M.E. et al. Requiring physicians to respond to computerized reminders improves their compliance with preventive care protocols. J Gen Intern Med 8, 311–317 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02600144

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02600144

Key words

Navigation