Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evaluating the quality of care provided by individual primary care physicians (PCPs) may be limited by failing to know which patients the PCP feels personally responsible for.
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a model for linking patients to specific PCPs.
DESIGN: Retrospective convenience sample.
PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen PCPs from 10 practice sites within an academic adult primary care network.
MEASUREMENTS: Each PCP reviewed the records for all outpatients seen over the preceding 3 years (16,435 patients reviewed) and designated each patient as “My Patient” or “Not My Patient.” Using this reference standard, we developed an algorithm with logistic regression modeling to predict “My Patient” using development and validation subsets drawn from the same patient set. Quality of care was then assessed by “My Patient” or “Not My Patient” designation by analyzing cancer screening test rates.
RESULTS: Overall, PCPs designated 11,226 patients (68.3%, range per provider 15% to 93%) to be “My Patient.” The model accurately categorized patients in development and validation subsets (combined sensitivity 80.4%, specificity 93.7%, and positive predictive value 96.5%). To achieve positive predictive values of >90% for individual PCPs, the model excluded 19.6% of PCP “My Patients” (range 5.5% to 75.3%). Cancer screening rates were higher among model-predicted “My Patients.”
CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one-third of patients seen were considered “Not My Patient” by the PCP, although this proportion varied widely. We developed and validated a simple model to link specific patients and PCPs. Such efforts may help effectively target interventions to improve primary care quality.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st-Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
Chassin MR, Galvin RW. The urgent need to improve health care quality. Institute of medicine national roundtable on health care quality. JAMA. 1998;280:1000–5.
McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2635–45.
Schuster MA, McGlynn EA, Brook RH. How good is the quality of health care in the United States? Milbank Q. 1998;76:517–63, 509.
Brook RH, McGlynn EA, Cleary PD. Quality of health care. Part 2: measuring quality of care. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:966–70.
Bass M. Approaches to the denominator problem in primary care research. J Fam Pract. 1976;3:193–5.
Cherkin DC, Berg AO, Phillips WR. In search of a solution to the primary care denominator problem. J Fam Pract. 1982;14:301–9.
Schlaud M, Brenner MH, Hoopmann M, Schwartz FW. Approaches to the denominator in practice-based epidemiology: a critical overview. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52(suppl 1):13S-9S.
Lasko TA, Atlas SJ, Barry MJ, Chueh HC. Automated identification of a physician’s primary patients. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13:74–9.
Wennberg JE, Fisher ES, Stukel TA, Skinner JS, Sharp SM, Bronner KK. Use of hospitals, physician visits, and hospice care during last six months of life among cohorts loyal to highly respected hospitals in the United States. Br Med J. 2004;328:607.
Anderson JE, Gancher WA, Bell PW. Validation of the patient roster in a primary care practice. Health Serv Res. 1985;20:301–14.
Blumenthal D, Epstein AM. Quality of health care. Part 6: the role of physicians in the future of quality management. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1328–31.
Gray DP, Evans P, Sweeney K, et al. Towards a theory of continuity of care. J Roy Soc Med. 2003;96:160–6.
Parkerton PH, Smith DG, Straley HL. Primary care practice coordination versus physician continuity. Fam Med. 2004;36:15–21.
Hofer TP, Hayward RA, Greenfield S, Wagner EH, Kaplan SH, Manning WG. The unreliability of individual physician “report cards” for assessing the costs and quality of care of a chronic disease. JAMA. 1999;281:2098–105.
Epstein AM. Health care in America—still too separate, not yet equal. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:603–5.
Roberge D, Beaulieu MD, Haddad S, Lebeau R, Pineault R. Loyalty to the regular care provider: patients’ and physicians’ views. Fam Pract. 2001;18:53–9.
De Maeseneer JM, De Prins L, Gosset C, Heyerick J. Provider continuity in family medicine: does it make a difference for total health care costs? Ann Fam Med. 2003;1:144–8.
Wasson JH, Sauvigne AE, Mogielnicki RP, et al. Continuity of outpatient medical care in elderly men. A randomized trial. JAMA. 1984;252:2413–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supported by institutional funding through the Massachusetts General Hospital Primary Care Operations Improvement program.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Atlas, S.J., Chang, Y., Lasko, T.A. et al. Is this “My’ patient? Development and validation of a predictive model to link patients to primary care providers. J GEN INTERN MED 21, 973–978 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02743147
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02743147