Abstract
The aim of this study was to understand development of resistance to alamethicin (a model barrel stave pore forming antimicrobial peptide) by investigating changes in phospholipid profile, fatty acid side chain analysis and extent of alamethicin insertion in biomimetic membrane prepared form wild type strains and five folds alamethicin resistant variants ofStaphylococcus aureus NCDC 110,Enterococcus faecalis NCDC 114 andBacillus cereus NCDC 66. The wild type strains NCDC 110, 114, 66, were sensitive to alamethicin with IC50 5.5, 3.25 and 2.0 μg/ml respectively. Wild type strains were cultured in the presence of alamethicin to select resistant variants with IC50 29.0, 17.0 and 9.5 μg/ml respectively. The phospholipid profile analysis revealed increase in amino-group containing phospholipids to amino-group lacking phospholipids ratio between wild-type and resistant variant inS. aureus and B. cereus but decreased inE. faecalis. Predominant fatty acids in all strains were composed of even number of carbons. Linoleic acid was detected only in resistant strain ofB. cereus. As indicated by saturated-to-unsaturated fatty acids ratio, the membrane fromS. aureus andE. faecalis became more rigid, whereas, inB. cereus it became more fluid. Using a colorimetricin vitro assay, a decrease in alamethicin insertion in the biomimetic membrane could be observed upon acquisition of resistance. The membranes of five-fold alamethicin-resistantS. aureus, E. faecalis andB. cereus revealed changes in membrane fluidity and surface charge upon acquisition of resistance to alamethicin.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beven L., Helluin O., Molle G., Duclohier H., Wroblewski H. (1999). Correlation between anti-bacterial activity and pore sizes of two classes of voltage-dependent channel-forming peptides. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1421 (1): 53–63.
Bligh E.G., Dyer E.J. (1959). A Rapid method for total lipid extraction and purification. Can. J. Biochem. Physiol., 37: 911–917.
Brogden K.A. (2005). Antimicrobial peptides: Pore formers or metabolic inhibitors in bacteria. Nature Rev. Microbiol., 3: 238–250.
Cabo M.L., Murado M.A., Gonzalez M.P., Pastoriza L. (1999). A method for bacteriocin quantification. J. Appl. Microbiol., 87 (6): 907–914.
Charych D.H., Nagy J.O., Waynespevak M.D., Bednarski (1993). Direct colorimetric detection of a receptor-ligand interaction by a polymerized bilayer assembly. Science, 261: 585–588.
Chen Y., Ludescher R.D., Montville T.J. (1998). Influence of lipid composition on pediocin PA-1 binding to phospholipid vesicles. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 64: 3530–3532.
Chen F., Lee M., Hang H.W. (2002). Sigmoidal concentration dependence of antimicrobial peptide activities: A case study of alamethicin. Biophysics J., 82: 908–914.
Crandall A.D., Montville T.J. (1998). Nisin resistance inListeria monocytogenes ATCC 700302 is a complex phenotype. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 64 (1): 231–237.
Davis E.A., Adams M.R. (1994). Resistance ofListeria monocytogenes to the bacteriocin nisin. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 21: 341–347.
Food and Drug Administration (1988). Nisin preparation: Affirmation of GRAS status as a direct human food ingredient. Food and Drug Administration, Federal Register, 53: 11247.
Gravesen A., Ramnath M., Rechinger K.B., Anderesen N., Jansch L., Hechard Y., Hastings J., Knochel S. (2001). High level resistance to class IIa bacteriocins is associated with one general mechanism inListeria monocytogenes. Microbiology, 148: 2361–2369.
Hancock R.E.W., Chapple D.S. (1999). Peptide antibiotics. Antimicrob. Agent Chemother., 43 (6): 1317–1323.
Hechard Y., Pelletier C., Cenatiempo Y., Free T. (2001). Analysis of δ54-dependent genes inEnterococcus faecalis: a mannose PTS permease (EIIMan) is involved in sensitivity to a bacteriocin, mesentericin Y105. Microbiology, 147: 1575–1580.
Jonas U., Shah K., Norvez S., Charych D.H. (1999). Reversible color switching and unusual solution polymerization of hydrazide modified diacetylene lipids. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 121 (19): 4580–4588.
Kahovcova J., Odavic R. (1969). A simple method for the quantitative analysis of phospholipids separated by thin layer chromatography. J. Chromatog., 40: 90–96.
Katz S.S., Weinrauch Y., Munford R.S., Weiss E.P. (1999). Deacylation of PS in wholeE. coli during destruction by cellular and extracellular components of a rabbit peritoneal inflammatory exudate. J. Biol. Chem., 274.
Kolusheva S., Shalal T., Jelinek R. (2000). Peptide-membrane interactions studied by a new phospholipid-polydiacetylene colorimetric assay. Biochemistry, 39: 15851–15859.
Li J., Chikindas, M.L., Ludescher R.D., Montville T.J. (2002). Temperature and surfactant induced membrane modifications that alterListeria monocytogenes nisin sensitivity by different mechanisms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 68 (12): 5904–5910.
Limonet M., Revol-Junelles A.M., Milliere J.B. (2002). Variations in the membrane fatty acid composition of resistant or susceptibleLeuconostoc or Weissella strains in presence or absence of Mesenterocin 52A and Mesenterocin 52B produced byLeuconostoc mesenteroides subsp.mesenteroides FR52. Appl. Enrivon. Microbiol., 68: 2910–2916.
Mazzotta A.S., Montville T.J. (1997). Nisin induces changes in membrane fatty acid composition ofListeria monocytogenes nisin-resistant strains at 10°C and 30°C. J. Appl. Microbiol., 82: 32–38.
Ming X., Daeschel M.A. (1995). Correlation of cellular phospholipid content with nisin resistance ofListeria monocytogenes. Scott A. J. Food Prot., 58: 416–420.
Moll G.N., Clark J., Chan W.C., Bycroft B.W., Roberts G.C., Konings W.N., Driessen A.J. (1997). Role of transmembrane pH gradient and membrane binding in nisin pore formation. J. Bacteriol., 179 (1): 135–140.
North C.L., Franklin J.C., Bryant R.G., Cafiso D.S. (1994). Molecular flexibility demonstrated by paramagnetic enhancements on nuclear relaxation. Application to alamethicin: a voltage-gated peptide channel. Biophys. J., 67: 1861–1866.
Powledge T.M. (2004). New antibiotics-resistance is futile. PLoS Biology, 2 (2): 151–154.
Rekhif N., Atrih A., Lefebvre G. (1994). Characterization and partial purification of plantaricin LC74, a bacteriocin produced byLactobacillus plantarum LC74. Biotech. Lett., 16 (8): 771–776.
Sakayori Y., Muramatsu M., Hanada S., Kamagata Y., Kawamoto S., Shima J. (2003). Characterization of Enterococcus faecium mutants resistant to mundticin KS, a class Ila bacteriocin. Microbiology, 149 (10): 2901–2908.
Sansom M.S.P. (1993). Alamethicin and related peptaibols: model ion channels. EurBiophys. J., 22: 105–124.
Segolene C., Alain R., Yanick A., Herve P., Djamel D. (2007). Identification of new genes associated with intermediate resistance ofEnterococcus faecalis to divercin V41, a pediocin-like bacteriocin. Microbiology, 153: 1609–1618.
Sood S.K., Sinha P.R. (2003). Analysis of structure of YGNGV motif containing bacteriocins: A model for pore formation. Indian J. Biotech., 2: 227–235.
Vadyvaloo V., Hastings J.W., Marthinus J., Van der Merwe, Rautenbach M. (2002). Members of class IIa bacteriocin-resistantListeria monocytogenes cells contain increased levels of desaturated and short-acyl-chain phosphatidylglycerols. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 68 (11): 5223–5230.
Verheul A., Russel N.J., Hof R.V.T., Rombouts M., Abee T. (1997). Modifications of membrane phospholipid composition in nisin-resistantListeria monocytogenes Scott A. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 63 (9): 3451–3457.
Yang L., Harroum T.A., Weiss T.M. (2001). Barrel stave model or Toroidal model? A case study on Melitin pores. Biophysics J., 81:1475–1485.
Younsi M.E., Ramananddraibe R.B., Donner M., Coulon J. (2000). Amphotericin B resistance and membrane fluidity inKluyveromyces lactis strains. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 44: 1911–1916.
Zasloff M. (2002). Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms. Nature, 415: 389–395.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thippeswamy, H.S., Sood, S.K., Venkateswarlu, R. et al. Membranes of five-fold alamethicin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis andBacillus cereus show decreased interactions with alamethicin due to changes in membrane fluidity and surface charge. Ann. Microbiol. 59, 593–601 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03175151
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03175151