Skip to main content
Log in

Childhood vaccination schedules in Europe vary widely

Is this a problem?

Große Unterschiede bei Impfempfehlungen für Kinder in Europa

Ist das ein Problem?

  • In der Diskussion
  • Published:
Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz Aims and scope

Abstract

Childhood vaccination programmes in Europe are basically very safe and effective. On the other hand there are very large differences between countries in the way they are organised. In this paper we analyse the immunisation schedules used in 29 European countries to highlight similarities and differences. One of the most evident differences is the total number of doses administered under 18 years of age, which ranges between 4 and 7 if we consider DT-containing vaccines. Any change in vaccination schedules is associated with costs. Thus, this process is worthy only if it can lead in the long run to an overall improvement in the national vaccination programmes. National sovereignty in the area of vaccination programmes prevails; therefore any step forward will be feasible only if consensus in Europe is reached.

Zusammenfassung

Die Programme der europäischen Länder für Impfungen im Kindesalter sind sichere und effektive Maßnahmen zur Prävention von Infektionskrankheiten. Jedoch bestehen zwischen den einzelnen Ländern große Unterschiede bezüglich ihrer Organisation. Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden nun zunächst die Impfempfehlungen 29 europäischer Staaten analysiert und ihre Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede am Beispiel der Impfempfehlungen gegen Diphtherie, Tetanus und Keuchhusten (DTP) zusammengefasst. An diesem Beispiel wird auch das Für und Wider einer Harmonisierung der Impfempfehlungen in der EU diskutiert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. EUVAC.NET web site. Accessible at: http://www.euvac.net/graphics/euvac/index.html

  2. World Health Organization (2002) United Nations Children’s fund. State of the World’s Vaccines and immunization. WHO, Geneva

  3. Tan T (2005) Epidemiology of pertussis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 24:S10–S18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Broder KR, Cortese MM, Iskander JK et al (2006) Preventing tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis among adolescents: use of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccines recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep 55:1–34

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wirsing von Konig CH, Riffelman M (2007) Pertussis: an old disease in new clothes Eurosurveillance Weekly. 12(9):E1–E2, http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=727

  6. GAVI Alliance web site. Accessible at: http://www.gavialliance.org/

  7. European Medicines Agency web site. Accessible at: http://www.emea.europa.eu

  8. The Treaty of the European Union, consolidated version. Accessible at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/treaties/dat/12002E/htm/C_2002325EN.003301.html)

  9. Regulation (EC) No 851/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 establishing a European Centre for disease prevention and control. Accessible at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexapi!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32004R0851&model=guicheti

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P.L. Lopalco.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lopalco, P., de Carvalho, H., Kreidl, P. et al. Childhood vaccination schedules in Europe vary widely. Bundesgesundheitsbl. 52, 1095–1098 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-009-0960-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-009-0960-z

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation