Skip to main content
Log in

Die Zukunft der Biomarker in der Demenzdiagnostik

The future of biomarkers in dementia diagnostics

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Nervenarzt Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die neurochemische Demenzdiagnostik (NDD) ist ein Routineinstrument in der Diagnostik neurodegenerativer Erkrankungen wie der Alzheimer-Erkrankung (Alzheimer’s disease, AD). Gegenwärtig werden zwei Biomarkergruppen verwendet, die im Liquor cerebrospinalis („cerebrospinal fluid“, CSF) gemessen werden. Es handelt sich um Amyloid-β-Peptide (Aβ) und Tau-Proteine einschließlich hyperphosphorylierte Formen (pTau). Aktuell geht die Entwicklung der NDD in folgende Richtungen: 1. Suche nach neuen Biomarkern mit verbesserter diagnostischer Leistung; 2. Suche nach Biomarkern im Blut; 3. Anwendung neuer Technologien zur ökonomischeren Handhabung der Patientenproben; 4. Optimierung der Bestimmung bereits verwendeter Biomarker (z. B. durch verbesserte Qualitätskontrolle und Vergleichbarkeit der Ergebnisse unterschiedlicher Labore). In diesem Artikel geben wir einen kurzen Überblick über die gegenwärtige Situation auf dem Gebiet der liquorbasierten NDD und fassen einige Hypothesen zur möglichen zukünftigen Entwicklung zusammen.

Summary

Neurochemical dementia diagnostics (NDD) is a routine laboratory tool in the diagnostic process of patients with neurodegenerative disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Currently, two groups of biomarkers analyzed in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are being considered, namely amyloid β (Aβ) peptides and tau proteins, along with the hyperphosphorylated forms of the latter (p-tau). Current directions in the development of NDD include the following: 1. search for novel biomarkers with improved analytical or diagnostic performance; 2. search for biomarkers in the blood; 3. applications of novel technologies enabling better management of patient samples; 4. optimization of the analysis of the biomarkers already available (for example, by improved quality control and inter-laboratory comparison of results). This review presents the state of the art in the field of CSF-based NDD and also summarizes some of the hypotheses of how the future development of NDD tools might look.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Albert MS, DeKosky ST, Dickson D et al (2011) The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 7:270–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Andreasen N, Blennow K (2005) CSF biomarkers for mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer’s disease. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 107:165–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Andreasen N, Sjogren M, Blennow K (2003) CSF markers for Alzheimer’s disease: total tau, phospho-tau and Abeta42. World J Biol Psychiatry 4:147–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barthel H, Gertz HJ, Dresel S et al (2011) Cerebral amyloid-beta PET with florbetaben (18 F) in patients with Alzheimer’s disease and healthy controls: a multicentre phase 2 diagnostic study. Lancet Neurol 10:424–435

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Blennow K (2004) Cerebrospinal fluid protein biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease. NeuroRx 1:213–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Blennow K, Hampel H (2003) CSF markers for incipient Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol 2:605–613

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Carson RT, Vignali DA (1999) Simultaneous quantitation of 15 cytokines using a multiplexed flow cytometric assay. J Immunol Methods 227:41–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. DeMattos RB, Bales KR, Cummins DJ et al (2001) Peripheral anti-A beta antibody alters CNS and plasma A beta clearance and decreases brain A beta burden in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:8850–8855

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. DeMattos RB, Bales KR, Cummins DJ et al (2002) Brain to plasma amyloid-beta efflux: a measure of brain amyloid burden in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Science 295:2264–2267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Di Luca M, Pastorino L, Bianchetti A et al (1998) Differential level of platelet amyloid beta precursor protein isoforms: an early marker for Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol 55:1195–1200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dubois B, Feldman HH, Jacova C et al (2010) Revising the definition of Alzheimer’s disease: a new lexicon. Lancet Neurol 9:1118–1127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dubois B, Feldman HH, Jacova C et al (2007) Research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: revising the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria. Lancet Neurol 6:734–746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Felgenhauer K, Beuche W (1999) Labordiagnostik neurologischer Erkrankungen: Liquoranalytik und -zytologie, Diagnose- und Prozessmarker. Thieme, Stuttgart

  14. Funke SA, Birkmann E, Henke F et al (2007) Single particle detection of Abeta aggregates associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 364:902–907

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gabelle A, Roche S, Geny C et al (2010) Correlations between soluble alpha/beta forms of amyloid precursor protein and Abeta38, 40, and 42 in human cerebrospinal fluid. Brain Res 1357:175–183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Graff-Radford NR, Crook JE, Lucas J et al (2007) Association of low plasma Abeta42/Abeta40 ratios with increased imminent risk for mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol 64:354–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hampel H, Buerger K, Zinkowski R et al (2004) Measurement of phosphorylated tau epitopes in the differential diagnosis of Alzheimer disease: a comparative cerebrospinal fluid study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 61:95–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuo YM, Kokjohn TA, Watson MD et al (2000) Elevated abeta42 in skeletal muscle of Alzheimer disease patients suggests peripheral alterations of AbetaPP metabolism. Am J Pathol 156:797–805

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lewczuk P, Beck G, Ganslandt O et al (2006) International quality control survey of neurochemical dementia diagnostics. Neurosci Lett 409:1–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lewczuk P, Esselmann H, Bibl M et al (2004) Tau protein phosphorylated at threonine 181 in CSF as a neurochemical biomarker in Alzheimer’s disease: original data and review of the literature. J Mol Neurosci 23:115–122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lewczuk P, Esselmann H, Otto M et al (2004) Neurochemical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s dementia by CSF Abeta42, Abeta42/Abeta40 ratio and total tau. Neurobiol Aging 25:273–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lewczuk P, Kamrowski-Kruck H, Peters O et al (2010) Soluble amyloid precursor proteins in the cerebrospinal fluid as novel potential biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease: a multicenter study. Mol Psychiatry 15:138–145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lewczuk P, Kornhuber J, Vanderstichele H et al (2008) Multiplexed quantification of dementia biomarkers in the CSF of patients with early dementias and MCI: a multicenter study. Neurobiol Aging 29:812–818

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lewczuk P, Kornhuber J, Vanmechelen E et al (2010) Amyloid beta peptides in plasma in early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: A multicenter study with multiplexing. Exp Neurol 223:366–370

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mattsson N, Blennow K, Zetterberg H (2009) CSF biomarkers: pinpointing Alzheimer pathogenesis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1180:28–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mattsson N, Blennow K, Zetterberg H (2010) Inter-laboratory variation in cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease: united we stand, divided we fall. Clin Chem Lab Med 48:603–607

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mayeux R, Honig LS, Tang MX et al (2003) Plasma A[beta]40 and A[beta]42 and Alzheimer’s disease: relation to age, mortality, and risk. Neurology 61:1185–1190

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H et al (2011) The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 7:263–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Olsson A, Vanderstichele H, Andreasen N et al (2005) Simultaneous measurement of beta-amyloid(1-42), total tau, and phosphorylated tau (Thr181) in cerebrospinal fluid by the xMAP technology. Clin Chem 51:336–345

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Preston SD, Steart PV, Wilkinson A et al (2003) Capillary and arterial cerebral amyloid angiopathy in Alzheimer’s disease: defining the perivascular route for the elimination of amyloid beta from the human brain. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 29:106–117

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Reiber H (2001) Dynamics of brain-derived proteins in cerebrospinal fluid. Clin Chim Acta 310:173–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Riemenschneider M, Schmolke M, Lautenschlager N et al (2000) Cerebrospinal beta-amyloid ((1-42)) in early Alzheimer’s disease: association with apolipoprotein E genotype and cognitive decline. Neurosci Lett 284:85–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sperling RA, Aisen PS, Beckett LA et al (2011) Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 7:280–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sun X, Steffens DC, Au R et al (2008) Amyloid-associated depression: a prodromal depression of Alzheimer disease? Arch Gen Psychiatry 65:542–550

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Oijen M van, Hofman A, Soares HD et al (2006) Plasma Abeta(1-40) and Abeta(1-42) and the risk of dementia: a prospective case-cohort study. Lancet Neurol 5:655–660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Verwey NA, Flier WM van der, Blennow K et al (2009) A worldwide multicentre comparison of assays for cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Clin Biochem 46:235–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Vignali DA (2000) Multiplexed particle-based flow cytometric assays. J Immunol Methods 243:243–255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Wiltfang J, Esselmann H, Maler JM et al (2001) Molecular biology of Alzheimer’s dementia and its clinical relevance to early diagnosis and new therapeutic strategies. Gerontology 47:65–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Zetterberg H, Wahlund LO, Blennow K (2003) Cerebrospinal fluid markers for prediction of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Lett 352:67–69

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikte

Der korrespondierende Autor weist auf folgende Beziehungen hin: PL ist Fachberater für Innogenetics. Die anderen Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt bestehe.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Kornhuber.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zimmermann, R., Kornhuber, J. & Lewczuk, P. Die Zukunft der Biomarker in der Demenzdiagnostik. Nervenarzt 82, 1385–1394 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-011-3348-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-011-3348-x

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation