Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Monitoring of mental health systems and services

Comparison of four existing indicator schemes

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A public mental health indicator scheme may be defined as a systematic collection of brief proxy measures that represent summary information on variables that are potentially influenced by or relevant to mental health systems, programmes and services. Existing public mental health indicator schemes have been developed in or for high-income countries.

Method

The paper describes and compares four existing high-income country public mental health indicator schemes and highlights key observations.

Results

The range of indicators and subclasses of indicators covered by the four existing schemes is large. There was only one item (indicator) that was covered by more than one scheme.

Conclusions

The variety of possibilities in indicators and types of indicators suggests a lack of consensus in the essential contents of an indicator scheme. There is a need for a public mental health indicator scheme that is applicable in resource-poor countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization (WHO) (2001) World Health Report 2001. Mental health: New understanding, new hope. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bodart C, Shrestha LB (2000) Identifying information needs and indicators. In: World Health Organization (WHO). Design and implementation of health information systems. (pp. 49–72) WHO, Geneva

  3. World Health Organization (WHO) (2000) Design and implementation of health information systems. WHO, Geneva

  4. Grau L, West B, Gregory P (1998) “How do you feel?” Self-reported health as an indicator of current physical and mental health status. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv 36:24–30

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jenkins R (1990) Towards a system of outcome indicators for mental health care. Br J Psychiatry 157:500–514

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Taylor SE, Lerner JS, Sherman DK, Sage RM, McDowell NK (2003) Portrait of the self-enhancer: well adjusted and well liked or maladjusted and friendless? J Pers Soc Psychol 84:165–76

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. World Health Organization (WHO) (2003) Mental Health Policy, Plans and Programmes: Module. WHO, Geneva

  8. World Health Organization (WHO) (2003) Mental Health Information Systems and Indicators: Module (draft). WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leginski WA, Croze C, Driggers J, Dumpman S, Geertsen D, Kamis-Gould E, Namerow J, patton RE, Wilson NZ, Wurster CR (1989) Data standards for mental health: Decision support systems. US Department of Health and Human services Rockville, MD

    Google Scholar 

  10. Manderscheid RW, Witkin MJ, Rosenstein MJ, Bass RD (1986) The National Reporting Program for Mental Health Statistics: history and findings. Public Health Rep 101:532–539

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Glover GR, Sinclair-Smith H (2000) Computerised information systems in English mental health care providers in 1998. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 35:518–522

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kamis-Gould E, Waizer J (1992) National data standards for mental health management and performance indicators. The Psychiatric Hospital 23:23–28

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Teague GB, Ganju V, Hornik JA, Johnson JR, McKinney J (1997). The MHSIP Mental Health Report Card: A consumer oriented approach to monitoring the quality of health plans. Eval Rev 21:330–341

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Commission for Health Improvement (2003) Final Performance Indicators for Mental Health Trusts (2002/2003). Commission for Health Improvement http://www.chi.nhs.uk/Ratings/Trust/Indicator/indicators.asp? trustType=3 accessed on August 12 2005).

  15. Mental Health Statistics Improvement Program (MHSIP) (1996) The MHSIP Consumer-Oriented Report Card: Final Report of the Mental Health Statistics Improvement Program (MHSIP) Task Force on a Consumer-Oriented Mental Health Report Card. MHSIP

  16. Stakes. Minimum data set of European mental health indicators (2001) Helsinki: Stakes. ( http://www.stakes.fi/verkkojulk/pdf/minimum.pdf accessed on November 18 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. United States (US) Department of Health and Human Services (2000) Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health. 2nd edn. 2 vols. U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, DC. (http://www.healthypeople.gov/Document/HTML/Volume2/18Mental.htm)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Eisen SV, Shaul JA, Leff HS, Stringfellow VL, Clarridge BR, Cleary PD (2001) Toward a National Consumer Survey: Evaluation of the CABHS and MHSIP Instruments. J Behav Health Serv Res 28:347–369

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shaul, JA, Eisen SV, Clarridge BR, Stringfellow BL, Fowler FJ, Claery PD, in collaboration with the ECHO development team (2001) Experiences of Care and Health Outcomes (ECHO) Survey: Field Test report

  20. National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors (NASMHPD) Research Institute, Inc (1998) Five-State Feasibility Study on State mental Health Agency Performance Measures. NASMHPD Research Institute

  21. Lutterman T, Ganju V, Schacht L, Shaw R, Mohikan K et al. (2003) Sixteen State Study on Mental Health Performance Measures. DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 03–3835. Centre for Mental Health Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Rockville, MD

    Google Scholar 

  22. National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors Research (NASMHPD) President’s Task Force on Performance Measures Technical Workgroup (1998) Performance Measures for Mental Health Systems: A Standardized Framework. NASMHPD Research Institute

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mental Health Statistics Improvement Program (MHSIP) (2003) MHSIP Mental Health Quality Report (draft). MHSIP. (http://www.mhsip.org/reportcard/reportcard.html , accessed 20 October 2003)

  24. United States (US) Department of Health, Education and Welfare (1979) Healthy People: the Surgeon’s General Report on Health Promotion and Disease Prevention. Public Health Service, US Government Printing Office, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  25. United States (US) Department of Health and Human Services (1991) Healthy People: National health promotion and disease prevention objectives. Public Health Service, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  26. National Center for Health Statistics (2003) DATA 2010: the Healthy People 2010 Database. Centres of Disease Control Atlanta. ( http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/otheract/hpdata2010/aboutdata2010.htm accessed on November 19 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Thornicroft G, Tansella M (1999) The mental health matrix: A manual to improve services. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  28. Heine SJ, Lehman DR, Markus HR, Kitayama S (1999) Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? Psychol Rev 106:766–794

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Held BS (2002) The tyranny of the positive attitude in America: observation and speculation. J Clin Psychol 58:965–991

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. World Health Organization (WHO) (2005) WHO Assessment Instrument for Mental Health Systems (WHO-AIMS). WHO, Geneva http://www.who.int/mental_health/evidence/WHO-AIMS/en/index.html

  31. Saxena S, Lora A, van Ommeren M, Barrett T, Morris J, Saraceno B (in preparation) WHO Assessment Instrument for Mental Health Systems: rationale and development process

  32. Ginsberg PE (1984) The dysfunctional side effects of quantitative indicator production: illustration from mental health care (a message from Chicken Little). Eval Program Plan 7:1–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hendryx MS, Teague GB (2001) Comparing alternative risk-adjustment models. J Behav Health Serv Res 28:247–257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Weissman EM, Rosenheck RA, Essock SM (2002) Impact of modifying risk adjustment models on rankings of access to care in the VA mental health report card. Psychiatr Serv 53:1153–1158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shekhar Saxena.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saxena, S., van Ommeren, M., Lora, A. et al. Monitoring of mental health systems and services. Soc Psychiat Epidemiol 41, 488–497 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-006-0053-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-006-0053-3

Key words

Navigation