Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bildgebende Diagnostik der Hüftdysplasie

Imaging in developmental dysplasia of the hip

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Orthopäde Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die detaillierte bildgebende Darstellung von Pathomorphologien des Hüftgelenks stellt einen wichtigen diagnostischen Baustein zur Bewertung und therapeutischen Entscheidungsfindung bei Hüftgelenkbeschwerden dar. Sowohl die konventionelle Röntgenbildgebung wie auch die Schnittbildgebung inklusive der Magnetresonanzarthrographie sind wertvolle Werkzeuge zur umfassenden diagnostischen Bewertung der Hüftgelenkmorphologie. Morphologische Abweichungen werden anhand der aktuell im Routinebetrieb zum Einsatz kommenden Techniken insbesondere im Hinblick auf die Ausprägung der Hüftgelenküberdachung im Spannungsfeld zwischen Dysplasie und femoroazetabulärem Impingement dargestellt und objektivierbare Parameter vorgestellt.

Abstract

Modern imaging techniques are an invaluable tool for assessing pathomorphological changes of the hip. Thorough diagnostic analysis and therapeutic decision making mainly rely on correct interpretation of conventional radiographic projections as well as more modern techniques, including magnetic resonance arthrography. This article gives an overview of the imaging techniques that are routinely used for assessing pathological conditions of the hip, with a special focus on diagnostic findings in developmental dysplasia of the hip as well as in femoroacetabular impingement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7
Abb. 8
Abb. 9
Abb. 10
Abb. 11

Literatur

  1. Anda S (1993) Acetabular dysplasia in the adolescent and young adult. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286: 308–310

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Anda S, Svenningsen S, Dale LG, Benum P (1986) The acetabular sector angle of the adult hip determined by computed tomography. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 27(4): 443–447

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anda S, Terjesen T, Kvistad KA (1991) Computed tomography measurements of the acetabulum in adult dysplastic hips: which level is appropriate? Skeletal Radiol 20(4): 267–271

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Anda S, Terjesen T, Kvistad KA, Svenningsen S (1991) Acetabular angles and femoral anteversion in dysplastic hips in adults: CT investigation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 15(1): 115–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Czerny C, Hofmann S, Neuhold A et al. (1996) Lesions of the acetabular labrum: accuracy of MR imaging and MR arthrography in detection and staging. Radiology 200(1): 225–230

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Eijer H, Leunig M, Mahomed MN, Ganz K (2001) Crosstable lateral radiograph for screening of anterior femoral head-neck offset in patients with femoro-acetabular impingement. Hip Int 11: 37–41

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M et al. (2003) Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417: 112–120

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Heyman CH, Herndon CH (1950) Legg-Perthes disease; a method for the measurement of the roentgenographic result. J Bone Joint Surg Am 32(4): 767–778

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lequesne M (1963) Coxometry measurement of the basic angles of the adult radiographic hip by a combined protractor. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic 30: 479–485

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lequesne MG, Laredo JD (1998) The faux profil (oblique view) of the hip in the standing position. Contribution to the evaluation of osteoarthritis of the adult hip. Ann Rheum Dis 57(11): 676–681

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Li PL, Ganz R (2003) Morphologic features of congenital acetabular dysplasia: one in six is retroverted. Clin Orthop Relat Res 416: 245–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mast JW, Brunner RL, Zebrack J (2004) Recognizing acetabular version in the radiographic presentation of hip dysplasia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 418: 48–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Murphy SB, Ganz R, Muller ME (1995) The prognosis in untreated dysplasia of the hip. A study of radiographic factors that predict the outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77(7): 985–989

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Notzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH et al. (2002) The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84(4): 556–560

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Siebenrock KA, Kalbermatten DF, Ganz R (2003) Effect of pelvic tilt on acetabular retroversion: a study of pelves from cadavers. Clin Orthop Relat Res 407: 241–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Siebenrock KA, Schoeniger R, Ganz R (2003) Anterior femoro-acetabular impingement due to acetabular retroversion. Treatment with periacetabular osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85(2): 278–286

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Steppacher SD, Tannast M, Werlen S, Siebenrock KA (2008) Femoral morphology differs between deficient and excessive acetabular coverage. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(4): 782–790

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tannast M, Siebenrock KA, Anderson SE (2007) Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis--what the radiologist should know. Am J Roentgenol 188(6): 1540–1552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tönnis D (1984) Die angeborene Hüftdysplasie und Hüftluxation in Kindes- und Erwachsenenalter. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  20. Tonnis D, Heinecke A (1999) Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81(12): 1747–1770

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wiberg G (1939) Studies on dysplastic acetabula and congenital subluxation of the hip joint: With special reference to the complications of osteoarthritis. Acta Chir Scan 58(Suppl): 7–38

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Orthopädische Chirurgie, Inselspital, Universitätsspital, Freiburgstraße 3, CH-3010, Bern, Schweiz

    P. Henle, M. Tannast & K.A. Siebenrock

Authors
  1. P. Henle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Tannast
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K.A. Siebenrock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Henle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Henle, P., Tannast, M. & Siebenrock, K. Bildgebende Diagnostik der Hüftdysplasie. Orthopäde 37, 525–531 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-008-1235-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-008-1235-3

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation