Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Can the experienced ICU physician predict ICU length of stay and outcome better than less experienced colleagues?

  • Original
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To assess the ability of physicians with varying degrees of experience to predict the length of stay and outcome of intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

Design

Prospective, interview-based study.

Setting

A 31-bed mixed medical-surgical ICU.

Patients

A total of 223 consecutive patients (excluding those admitted for routine post-operative surveillance) admitted to the ICU.

Interventions

None.

Measurements and main results

Physicians immediately responsible for each patient, and others fully aware of the case, were interviewed separately during the first 12 h of ICU admission to determine their assessment of the patient’s likely duration of stay on the ICU and the probable outcome. Degree of predictive accuracy was assessed using the Kappa statistic with kappa ≤0.2 poor, 0.21–0.4 fair, 0.41–0.60 moderate, 0.61–0.8 good, and 0.81–1.0 very good. Physicians were graded according to their degree of experience as junior (less than 1 year ICU experience), medium (critical care fellow), and senior (staff physician with supervising functions). For lengths of stay less than 5 days, senior physicians were better predictors than less experienced doctors. For outcome prediction, physicians were generally moderately good at predicting death, with senior physicians tending to be more accurate than their less experienced colleagues (senior kappa 0.68, medium kappa 0.52, junior kappa 0.43).

Conclusions

Prediction of length of ICU stay was poor amongst all physicians in patients with a length of stay greater than 5 days. Experienced physicians were better predictors of ICU lengths of stay less than 5 days and, in contrast to some reports, of ICU outcome than their more inexperienced counterparts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F et al. (2001) Intensive insulin therapy in the critically ill patient. N Engl J Med 345:1359–1367

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Corwin HL, Gettinger A, Rodriguez RM et al. (1999) Efficacy of recombinant human erythropoietin in the critically ill patient: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Crit Care Med 27:2346–2350

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1985) APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 13:818–829

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Le Gall J-R, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F (1993) A new simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 270:2957–2963

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Christensen C, Cottrell JJ, Murakami J, Mackesy ME, Fetzer AS, Elstein AS (1993) Forecasting survival in the medical intensive care unit: a comparison of clinical prognoses with formal estimates. Methods Inf Med 32:302–308

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kruse JA, Thill-Baharozian MC, Carlson RW (1988) Comparison of clinical assessment with APACHE II for predicting mortality risk in patients admitted to a medical intensive care unit. JAMA 260:1739–1742

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brannen AL, Godfrey LJ, Goetter WE (1989) Prediction of outcome from critical illness. A comparison of clinical judgment with a prediction rule. Arch Intern Med 149:1083–1086

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Marks RJ, Simons RS, Blizzard RA, Browne DR (1991) Predicting outcome in intensive therapy units—a comparison of Apache II with subjective assessments. Intensive Care Med 17:159–163

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Knaus WA, Harrell FE Jr, Lynn J et al. (1995) The SUPPORT prognostic model. Objective estimates of survival for seriously ill hospitalized adults. Study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments. Ann Intern Med 122:191–203

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McClish DK, Powell SH (1989) How well can physicians estimate mortality in a medical intensive care unit? Med Decis Making 9:125–132

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Moreno R, Apolone G, Miranda DR (1998) Evaluation of the uniformity of fit of general outcome prediction models. Intensive Care Med 24:40–47

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Woods AW, MacKirdy FN, Livingston BM, Norrie J, Howie JC (2000) Evaluation of predicted and actual length of stay in 22 Scottish intensive care units using the APACHE III system. Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation. Anaesthesia 55:1058–1065

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Copeland-Fields L, Griffin T, Jenkins T, Buckley M, Wise LC (2001) Comparison of outcome predictions made by physicians, by nurses, and by using the mortality prediction model. Am J Crit Care 10:313–319

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tu JV, Mazer CD (1996) Can clinicians predict ICU length of stay following cardiac surgery? Can J Anaesth 43:789–794

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Marik PE, Hedman L (2000) What’s in a day? Determining intensive care unit length of stay. Crit Care Med 28:2090–2093

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mould RF (1998) Introductory medical statistics. Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol

  17. Society of Critical Care Medicine Ethics Committee (1994) Consensus statement on the triage of critically ill patients. JAMA 271:1200–1203

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Silverstein MD (1988) Prediction instruments and clinical judgment in critical care. JAMA 260:1758–1759

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Murray LS, Teasdale GM, Murray GD et al. (1993) Does prediction of outcome alter patient management? Lancet 341:1487–1491

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Barrera R, Nygard S, Sogoloff H, Groeger J, Wilson R (2001) Accuracy of predictions of survival at admission to the intensive care unit. J Crit Care 16:32–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Suter PM, Armaganidis A, Beaufils F et al. (1994) Consensus conference organized by the ESICM and SRLF: predicting outcome in ICU patients. Intensive Care Med 20:390–397

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Louis Vincent.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gusmão Vicente, F., Polito Lomar, F., Mélot, C. et al. Can the experienced ICU physician predict ICU length of stay and outcome better than less experienced colleagues?. Intensive Care Med 30, 655–659 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-003-2139-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-003-2139-7

Keywords

Navigation