Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Autopsy: quality assurance in the ICU

  • ORIGINAL
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To examine the correlation between the clinical diagnosis and autopsy findings in adult patients who died in an intensive care unit (ICU). To determine the rate of agreement of the basic and terminal causes of death and the types of errors in order to improve quality control of future care. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Adult ICU in a university hospital. Patients: 30 adult patients who died in the ICU, with the exclusion of medicolegal cases. Methods and main results: Anatomo-clinical meetings were held to analyze the pre- and postmortem correlations in 30 consecutive autopsies at the ICU of the University Hospital, School of Medicine of Botucatu/ UNESP, from January 1994 to January 1997. The rate of correct clinical diagnoses of the basic cause was 66.7 %; in 23.3 % of cases, if the correct diagnosis was made, management would have been different, as would have been the evolution of the patient's course (Class I error); in 10 % of the cases the error would not have led to a change in management (Class II error). The rate of correct clinical diagnoses of terminal cause was 80 %. Conclusions: The rate of recognition of the basic cause was 66.7 %, which is consistent with the literature, but the Class I error rate was higher than that reported in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 15 May 1998 Accepted: 4 December 1998

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gut, A., Ferreira, A. & Montenegro, M. Autopsy: quality assurance in the ICU. Intensive Care Med 25, 360–363 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001340050858

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001340050858

Navigation