Skip to main content
Log in

Loop security and tensile properties of polyblend and traditional suture materials

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Tensile and knot properties of new generation (polyblend) and traditional suture materials in orthopedic surgery were investigated in standard laboratory conditions. Study focused on Fiberwire No. 5 and 2, Ethibond No. 5, 2 and 00, Orthocord No. 2, MaxBraid No. 2, Prolene No. 0 and 00, PDS No. 0 and 00, and Vicryl No. 2, 0 and 00. A 27-cm suture loop was fastened with 10 knots for ten samples for each type. Test parameters were tensile load to failure, elongation at failure point and knot slippage, and volume of 10-fold knots. Results were compared using ANOVA test. Failure load of No. 5 Fiberwire (625.0 ± 30.0 N) was significantly higher compared to all other suture types. Tensile strengths of MaxBraid No. 2 (287 ± 11 N) was significantly stronger compared to two other No. 2 polyblend sutures types and Ethibond No. 5. Knot slippage of Fiberwire No. 5 (14 ± 1.9 mm) was significantly higher compared to all other suture types. Ethibond No. 2 (0.1 ± 0.3 mm) had the lowest knot slippage. Elongation at the failure point of Fiberwire No. 2 (5%) was significantly lower than all other suture types. Mean calculated knot volume of #5 Fiberwire (73 ± 6.9 mm3) was significantly higher compared to #5 Ethibond (53 ± 4.8 mm3). Results of the study proved presence of significant differences between tensile and knot properties of various suture types and sizes. Loop security of larger diameter sutures is not always higher than thinner sutures. Suture elongation and knot slippage are important failure modes for high-diameter sutures and short-suture loops.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abbi G, Espinoza L, Odell T, Mahar A, Pedowitz R (2006) Evaluation of 5 knots and 2 suture materials for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: very strong sutures can still slip. Arthroscopy 22:38–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barber FA, Herbert MA, Beavis RC (2009) Cyclic load and failure behavior of arthroscopic knots and high strength sutures. Arthroscopy 25(2):192–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barber FA, Herbert MA, Beavis RC, Barrera Oro F (2008) Suture anchor materials, eyelets, and designs: update 2008. Arthroscopy 24:859–867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Benthien RA, Aronow MS, Doran-Diaz V, Sullivan RJ, Naujoks R (2006) Cyclic loading of Achilles tendon repairs: a comparison of polyester and polyblend suture. Foot Ankle Int 27:512–518

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Burkhart SS, Wirth MA, Simonick M, Salem D, Athanasiou K (1998) Loop security as a determinant of tissue fixation security. Arthroscopy 14:773–776

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Burkhart SS, Wirth MA, Simonick M, Salem D, Lanctot D, Athanasiou K (2000) Knot security in simple sliding knots and its relationship to rotator cuff repair: how secure the knot must be? Arthroscopy 16:202–207

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Elkousy HA, Sekiya JK, Stabile KJ, McMahon PJ (2005) A biomechanical comparison of arthroscopic sliding and sliding-locking knots. Arthroscopy 21:204–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gebauer M, Beil FT, Beckmann J, Sarvary AM, Ueblacker P, Ruecker AH, Holste J, Meenen NM (2007) Mechanical evaluation of different techniques for Achilles tendon repair. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127:795–799

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ilahi OA, Younas SA, Ho DM, Noble PC (2008) Security of knots tied with Ethibond, Fiberwire, Orthocord and Ultrabraid. Am J Sports Med 36:2407–2414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jo CH, Lee JH, Kang SB, Lee JH, Han HS, Bae TS, Choi K, Lee C, Lee MC, Yoon KS (2008) Optimal configuration of arthroscopic sliding knots backed up with multiple half-hitches. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:787–793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lewis N, Quitkin HM (2003) Strength analysis and comparison of the Teno Fix tendon repair system with the two-strand modified Kessler repair in the Achilles tendon. Foot Ankle Int 24:857–860

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lieurance RK, Pflaster DS, Abbott D, Nattage WM (2003) Failure characteristics of various arthroscopically tied knots. Clin Orthop Relat Res 408:311–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lo IKY, Burkhart SS, Chan C, Athanasiou K (2004) Arthroscopic knots: determining the optimal balance of loop security and knot security. Arthroscopy 20:489–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Loutzenheiser TD, Harryman DT 2nd, Yung SW, France MP, Sidles JA (1995) Optimizing arthroscopic knots. Arthroscopy 11:199–206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mahar A, Odell T, Thomas W, Pedowitz R (2002) A biomechanical analysis of a novel arthroscopic suture method compared to standard suture knots and materials for rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 23:1162–1166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mahar A, Moezzi D, Serra-Hsu F, Pedowitz R (2002) Comparison and performance characteristics of two suture materials for shoulder arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 22:614.e1–614.e2

    Google Scholar 

  17. McKeon BP, Heming JF, Fulkerson J, Langeland R (2006) The Krackow stitch: a biomechanical evaluation of changing the number of loops versus the number of sutures. Arthroscopy 22:33–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shah MR, Strauss EJ, Kaplan K, Jazrawi L, Rosen J (2007) Initial loop and knot security of arthroscopic knots using high-strength sutures. Arthroscopy 23:884–888

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Swan KG Jr, Baldini T, McCarty EC (2009) Arthroscopic suture material and knot type: an updated biomechanical analysis. Am J Sports Med 37:1578–1585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wüst DM, Meyer DC, Favre P, Gerber C (2006) Mechanical and handling properties of braided polyblend polyethylene sutures in comparison to braided polyester and monofilament polydioxanone sutures. Arthroscopy 22:1146–1153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Önder Kılıçoğlu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Türker, M., Kılıçoğlu, Ö., Salduz, A. et al. Loop security and tensile properties of polyblend and traditional suture materials. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19, 296–302 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1186-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1186-1

Keywords

Navigation