Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cost-effectiveness of hip protectors in frail institutionalized elderly

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A randomized controlled trial was performed to examine the cost-effectiveness of external hip protectors in the prevention of hip fractures. Since the hip protectors were not effective in preventing hip fractures in our study, the main objective became to examine whether the use of hip protectors results in lower average costs per participant in the hip protector group as compared with the control group. In addition, the average costs of a hip fracture and subsequent rehabilitation in frail, institutionalized elderly were calculated. Residents from apartment houses for the elderly, homes for the elderly and nursing homes with a high risk for hip fractures were randomized to the hip protector group (n=276) or control group (n=285). Costs were calculated for the hip fracture and subsequent rehabilitation until 1 year after the fracture. Six months after each hip fracture, a nurse was interviewed and after 12 months, a questionnaire was sent to the general practitioner or nursing home physician to determine the utilization of health care resources. Differences in costs between the groups were analyzed using non-parametric bootstrapping. Eighteen hip fractures occurred in the intervention group and 20 hip fractures (in 19 persons) in the control group (log rank P-value=0.86). The average costs per participant, including the costs of the intervention, were €913 in the intervention group and €502 in the control group (cost difference of €−411; 95% confidence interval: −723; 57). The average costs of a hip fracture and subsequent rehabilitation were €8100 (95% CI: 6716–10,010). The use of hip protectors was not associated with lower costs. In addition, the average costs of a hip fracture and subsequent rehabilitation in the first year after the fracture were estimated at €8100 in institutionalized elderly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gullberg B, Johnell O, Kanis, JA (1997) World-wide projections for hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 7:407–413

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Parker MJ, Anand JK (1991) What is the true mortality of hip fractures? Public Health 105:443–446

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kirke PN, Sutton M, Burke H, Daly L (2002) Outcome of hip fracture in older Irish women: a 2-year follow-up of subjects in a case-control study. Injury 33:387–391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. De Laet CE, van Hout BA, Burger H, Weel AE, Hofman A, Pols HA (1999) Incremental cost of medical care after hip fracture and first vertebral fracture: the Rotterdam study. Osteoporos Int 10:66–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. van Balen R, Steyerberg EW, Polder JJ, Ribbers TL, Habbema JD, Cools HJ (2001) Hip fracture in elderly patients: outcomes for function, quality of life, and type of residence. Clin Orthop 390:232–243

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. van Schoor NM, Smit JH, Twisk JW, Bouter LM, Lips P (2003) Prevention of hip fractures by external hip protectors: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 289:1957–1962

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Parker MJ, Gillespie LD, Gillespie WJ (2003) Hip protectors for preventing hip fractures in the elderly (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library, Issue 4

  8. Oostenbrink JB, Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FF (2002) Standardisation of costs: the Dutch Manual for Costing in economic evaluations. Pharmacoeconomics 20:443–454

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, New York, London

  10. van Schoor NM, Asma G, Smit JH, Bouter LM, Lips P (2003) The Amsterdam Hip Protector Study: compliance and determinants of compliance. Osteoporos Int 14:353–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar BA, Parker MJ (2000) Are hip protectors cost effective? Injury 31:693–695

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Segui-Gomez M, Keuffel E, Frick KD (2002) Cost and effectiveness of hip protectors among the elderly. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 18:55–66

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Colon-Emeric CS, Datta SK, Matchar DB (2003) An economic analysis of external hip protector use in ambulatory nursing facility residents. Age Ageing 32:47–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. French FH, Torgerson DJ, Porter RW (1995) Cost analysis of fracture of the neck of femur. Age Ageing 24:185–189

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Greetje Asma, Trees Haverkort, Mirjam Lips, Laura Schaap, Joke Velders and Mireille Wolfers for their help in collecting the data. Furthermore, we would like to thank the residents and nursing staff of the participating homes for the elderly and nursing homes for their assistance and time. This study was funded by grants from VAZ Doelmatigheid, The Netherlands (grant 01241) and Praeventiefonds, The Netherlands (grant 28-3057). Tytex, Denmark, (distributor: Artu Biologicals, The Netherlands) provided the hip protectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Lips.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Schoor, N.M., de Bruyne, M.C., van der Roer, N. et al. Cost-effectiveness of hip protectors in frail institutionalized elderly. Osteoporos Int 15, 964–969 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1632-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1632-3

Keywords

Navigation