Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

“Pathologic” fractures: should these be included in epidemiologic studies of osteoporotic fractures?

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

Pathologic fractures are often excluded in epidemiologic studies of osteoporosis. Using Medicare administrative data, we identified persons with vertebral and hip fractures. Among these, 48% (vertebral) and 3% (hip) of the fractures were coded as pathologic. Only 25% and 66% of persons with these pathologic fractures had evidence for malignancy.

Introduction

Analyses of osteoporosis-related fractures that use administrative data often exclude pathologic fractures (ICD-9 733.1x) due to concern that these are caused by cancer. We examined “pathologic” fractures of the vertebrae and hip to evaluate their contribution to fracture incidence and assessed the evidence for a malignancy.

Methods

We studied US Medicare beneficiaries age ≥65 with new fractures identified using ICD-9 diagnosis codes 733.13 (pathologic vert), 805.0, 805.2, 805.4, 805.8 (nonpathologic vert); and 733.14 (pathologic hip), 820.0, 820.2, 820.8 (nonpathologic hip). We further examined the proportion of cases with a diagnosis of a malignancy proximate to the fracture.

Results

We identified 44,120 individuals with a vertebral fracture and 60,354 with a hip fracture. Approximately 48% of vertebral fractures and 3% of hip fractures were coded as pathologic. For only approximately 25% of persons with a “pathologic” vertebral fracture ICD-9 code, but 66% of persons with a “pathologic” hip fracture, there was evidence of a possible cancer diagnosis.

Conclusion

Among US Medicare beneficiaries, one fourth of pathologic vertebral fracture and two thirds of pathologic hip fracture cases had evidence for a malignancy. Particularly for vertebral fractures, excluding persons with pathologic fractures in epidemiologic analyses that utilize administrative claims data substantially underestimates the burden of fractures due to osteoporosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A (2007) Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005–2025. J Bone Miner Res 22(3):465–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gardner RL, Harris F, Vittinghoff E, Cummings SR (2008) The risk of fracture following hospitalization in older women and men. Arch Intern Med 168(15):1671–1677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. www.merriam-Webster.com, accessed September 25, 2008

  4. http://www.eicd.com/contact.htm. ICD-9-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting, effective October 1, 2007; accessed Feb. 22, 2008

  5. Baron JA, Lu-Yao G, Barrett J, McLerran D, Fisher ES (1994) Internal validation of Medicare claims data. Epidemiology 5(5):541–544

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ray WA, Griffin MR, Fought RL, Adams ML (1992) Identification of fractures from computerized Medicare files. J Clin Epidemiol 45(7):703–714

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Curtis J, Mudano A, Solomon DH, Xi J, Elkins M, Saag KG (2009) Identification and validation of vertebral compression fractures using administrative claims data. Medical Care 47(1):69–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McBean AM, Warren JL, Babish JD (1994) Measuring the incidence of cancer in elderly Americans using Medicare claims data. Cancer 73(9):2417–2425

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Warren JL, Feuer E, Potosky AL, Riley GF, Lynch CF (1999) Use of medicare hospital and physician data to assess breast cancer incidence. Med Care 37(5):445–456

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Whittle J, Steinberg EP, Anderson GF, Herbert R (1991) Accuracy of Medicare claims data for estimation of cancer incidence and resection rates among elderly Americans. Med Care 29(12):1226–1236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a contract between UAB and Amgen, Inc. Only the authors from UAB had access to the Medicare data used. The analysis, presentation, and interpretation of the results were solely the responsibility of the authors. Some of the investigators (JRC, KGS) also receive salary support from the National Institutes of Health (AR053351, AR052361), the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (U18 HS016956), and the Arthritis Foundation (JRC).

Conflicts of interest

JRC: Consulting: Roche, UCB, Procter & Gamble; speakers bureau: Merck, Procter & Gamble, Eli Lilly, Roche, Novartis; research grants: Merck, Procter & Gamble, Eli Lilly, Amgen, Novartis

RM: Research grants: Amgen

AT: Research grants: Amgen

MR: None

DJB: Research grants: Amgen

LG: Research grants: Amgen

MLK: Consulting and Research grants: Amgen, Eli Lilly

MM: Research grants: Amgen

KGS: Consulting: Amgen, Aventis, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis; Procter & Gamble, Roche, UCB; Speakers bureau: Novartis; Research grants: Novartis, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Roche

ED: Research grants: Amgen

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. R. Curtis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Curtis, J.R., Taylor, A.J., Matthews, R.S. et al. “Pathologic” fractures: should these be included in epidemiologic studies of osteoporotic fractures?. Osteoporos Int 20, 1969–1972 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-009-0840-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-009-0840-2

Keywords

Navigation