Abstract
Rationale
Addictive drugs have a number of commonalities in animal behavioral models. They lower intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) thresholds, support self-administration, and produce conditioned place preference (CPP). However, cannabinoids appear atypical as drugs of abuse, since there are controversial data in the literature concerning their reinforcing properties.
Objectives
The aim of the present study was to examine the effects of cannabinoids on brain reward using the rate–frequency curve shift paradigm of ICSS.
Methods
Male Sprague–Dawley rats were implanted with electrodes into the medial forebrain bundle (MFB). Rate–frequency functions were determined by logarithmically decreasing the number of cathodal pulses in a stimulation train from a value that sustained maximal responding to one that did not sustain responding. After brain stimulation reward thresholds stabilized rats received intraperitoneal (IP) injections of the potent CB1 receptor agonists WIN 55,212-2 (graded doses 0.1, 0.3, 1 and 3 mg/kg), CP 55,940 (graded doses 10, 30, 56 and 100 μg/kg), or HU-210 (graded doses 10, 30, 100 μg/kg).
Results
With the exception of the highest dose of all cannabinoid agonists tested, which significantly increased the threshold frequency required for MFB ICSS, all other doses of the tested drugs did not affect ICSS thresholds. The CB1 receptor antagonist SR141716A reversed the actions of WIN 55,212-2 and CP 55,940, but not HU-210. However, the selective CB1 cannabinoid receptor antagonist AM 251 counteracted the effect of HU-210. Both CB1 receptor antagonists, at the doses used in the present study, did not affect reward thresholds by themselves.
Conclusions
The present results indicate that cannabinoid agonists do not exhibit reinforcing properties in the ICSS paradigm, but rather have an inhibitory influence on reward mechanisms. The results suggest that the anhedonic effects of cannabinoids are probably mediated by cannabinoid CB1 receptors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams IB, Martin BR (1996) Cannabis: pharmacology and toxicology in animals and humans. Addiction 91:1585–1614
Ameri A (1999) The effects of cannabinoids on the brain. Prog Neurobiol 58:315–348
Arnold JC, Hunt GE, McGregor IS (2001) Effects of the cannabinoid receptor agonist CP 55,940 and the cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR 141716 on intracranial self-stimulation in Lewis rats. Life Sci 70:97–108
Bouaboula M, Perrachon S, Milligan L, Canat X, Rinaldi-Carmona M, Portier M, Barth F, Calandra B, Pecceu F, Lupker J, Maffrand JP, Le Fur G, Casellas P (1997) A selective inverse agonist for central cannabinoid receptor inhibits mitogen-activated protein kinase activation stimulated by insulin or insulin-like growth factor 1. Evidence for a new model of receptor/ligand interactions. J Biol Chem 272(35):22330–22339
Braida D, Pozzi M, Cavallini R, Sala M (2001a) Conditioned place preference induced by the cannabinoid agonist CP 55,940: interaction with the opioid system. Neuroscience 104:923–926
Braida D, Pozzi M, Parolaro D, Sala M (2001b) Intracerebral self-administration of the cannabinoid receptor agonist CP 55,940 in the rat: interaction with the opioid system. Eur J Pharmacol 413:227–234
Breivogel CS, Griffin G, Di Marzo V, Martin BR (2001) Evidence for a new G protein-coupled cannabinoid receptor in mouse brain. Mol Pharmacol 60:155–163
Chaperon F, Thiébot MH (1998) Behavioral effects of cannabinoid agents in animals. Crit Rev Neurobiol 13:243–281
Chaperon F, Soubrié P, Puech AJ, Thiébot MH (1998) Involvement of central cannabinoid (CB1) receptors in the establishment of place conditioning in rats. Psychopharmacology 135:324–332
Cheer JF, Kendall DA, Marsden CA (2000) Cannabinoid receptors and reward in the rat: a conditioned place preference study. Psychopharmacology 151:25–30
Compton DR, Gold LH, Ward SJ, Blster RL, Martin BR (1992) Aminoalkylindole analogs: cannabimimetic activity of a class of compounds structurally distinct from delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 263:1118–1126
Corcoran ME, Amit Z (1974) Reluctance of rats to drink hashish suspensions: free choice and forced consumption and the effects of hypothalamic stimulation. Psychopharmacologia 352:129–147
Coulombe D, Miliaressis E (1987) Fitting intracranial self-stimulation data with growth models. Behav Neurosci 101:209–214
Deroche-Gamonet V, Le Moal M, Piazza PV, Soubrié P (2001) SR 141716, a CB1 receptor antagonist, decreases the sensitivity to the reinforcing effects of electrical brain stimulation in rats. Psychopharmacology 157:254–259
Devane WA, Hanus L, Breuer A, Pertwee RG, Stevenson LA, Griffin G, Gibson D, Mandelbaum A, Etinger A, Mechoulam R (1992) Isolation and structure of a brain constituent that binds to the cannabinoid receptor. Science 258:1946–1949
De Vry J, Jentzsch KR (2003) Intrinsic activity estimation of cannabinoid CB1 receptor ligands in a drug discrimination paradigm. Behav Pharmacol 14:471–476
De Vry J, Jentzsch KR (2004) Partial agonist-like profile of the cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR141716A in a food-reinforced operant paradigm. Behav Pharmacol 15:13–20
Di Chiara G, Acquas E, Tanda G, Cadoni C (1993) Drugs of abuse: biochemical surrogates of specific aspects of natural reward? Biochem Soc Symp 59:65–81
Di Marzo V, Berrendero F, Bisogno T, Gonzalez S, Cavaliere P, Romero J, Cebeira M, Ramos JA, Fernandez-Ruiz JJ (2000) Enhancement of anandamide formation in the limbic forebrain and reduction of endocannabinoid contents in the striatum of delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol-tolerant rats. J Neurochem 74:1627–1635
Elsmore TF, Fletcher GV (1972) Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol: aversive effects in rats at high doses. Science 171:911–912
Fattore L, Cossu G, Martellotta CM, Fratta W (2001) Intravenous self-administration of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 in rats. Psychopharmacology 156:410–416
Felder CC, Glass M (1998) Cannabinoid receptors and their endogenous agonists. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 38:179–200
Fibiger HC, Phillips AG (1986) Reward, motivation, cognition: psychobiology of the mesotelencephalic systems. In: Bloom FE (ed) Handbook of physiology, section I: the nervous system, vol IV. American Psysiological Society, Bethesda, pp 647–675
Fouriezos G, Wise RA (1976) Pimozide-induced extinction of intracranial self-stimulation: response patterns rule out motor or performance deficits. Brain Res 103:377–380
Fouriezos G, Hansson P, Wise RA (1978) Neuroleptic-induced attenuation of brain stimulation reward in rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol 92:661–671
Franklin KBJ (1978) Catecholamines and self-stimulation: reward and performance effects dissociated. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 9:813–820
Gallistel CR, Freyd G (1987) Quantitative determination of the effects of catecholaminergic agonists and antagonists on the rewarding efficacy of brain stimulation. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 26:731–741
Gallistel CR, Karras D (1984) Pimozide and amphetamine have opposing effects on the reward summation function. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 20:73–77
Gardner EL, Vorel SR (1998) Cannabinoid transmission and reward-related events. Neurobiol Dis 5:502–533
Gardner EL, Paredes W, Smith D, Donner A, Milling C, Cohen D, Morrison D (1988) Facilitation of brain stimulation reward by Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol. Psychopharmacology 96:142–144
Gatley SJ, Gifford AN, Volkow ND, Lan R, Makriyannis A (1996) 123I-labeled AM251: a radioiodinated ligand which binds in vivo to mouse brain cannabinoid CB1 receptors. Eur J Pharmacol 307:331–338
Grotenhermen F (2004) Pharmacology of cannabinoids. Neuroendocrinol Lett 25(1/2):14–23
Haller J, Bakos N, Szirmay M, Ledent C, Freund TF (2002) The effects of genetic and pharmacological blockade of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor on anxiety. Eur J Neurosci 16(7):1395–1398
Hanus L, Abu-Lafi S, Fride E, Breuer A, Vogel Z, Shalev DE, Kustanovich I, Mechoulam R (2001) 2-Arachidonyl glyceryl ether, an endogenous agonist of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:3662–3665
Harris RT, Waters W, McLendon D (1974) Evaluation of reinforcing capability of DELTA 9-THC in rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacologia 37:23–39
Harrison AA, Liem YTB, Markou A (2001) Fluoxetine combined with a serotonin-1A receptor antagonist reversed reward deficits observed during nicotine and amphetamine withdrawal in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 25:55–71
Huang SM, Bisogno T, Trevisani M, Al-Hayani A, De Petrocellis L, Fezza F, Tognetto M, Petros TJ, Krey JF, Chu CJ, Miller JD, Davies SN, Geppetti P, Walker JM, Di Marzo V (2002) An endogenous capsaicin-like substance with high potency at recombinant and native vanilloid VR1 receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:8400–8405
Hunt T, Amit Z (1987) Conditioned taste aversion induced by self-administered drugs: paradox revisited. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 11:107–130
Iversen L (2003) Cannabis and the brain. Brain 126:1252–1270
Järbe TUC, DiPatrizio NV, Li C, Makriyiannis A (2003a) The cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR-141716A does not readily antagonize open-field effects induced by the cannabinoid receptor agonist (R)-methanandamide in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 75:809–821
Järbe TUC, Lamb RJ, Liu Q, Makriyiannis A (2003b) (R)-methanandamide and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol-induced operant rate decreases in rats are not readily antagonized by SR-141716A. Eur J Pharmacol 466:121–127
Justinova Z, Tanda G, Redhi GH, Goldberg SR (2003) Self-administration of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) by drug naive squirrel monkeys. Psychopharmacology 169:135–140
Kucharski LT, Williams JE, Kornetsky C (1983) The effects of levonantradol on rewarding brain stimulation thresholds in the rat. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 19:149–151
Landsman RS, Burkey TH, Consroe P, Roeske WR, Yamamura HI (1997) SR141716A is an inverse agonist at the human cannabinoid CB1 receptor. Eur J Pharmacol 334:R1–R2
Leite JL, Carlini EA (1974) Failure to obtain “cannabis directed behavior” and abstinence syndrome in rats chronically treated with cannabis sativa extracts. Psychopharmacologia 36:133–145
Lepore M, Vorel SR, Lowinson J, Gardner EL (1995) Conditioned place preference induced by Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol: comparison with cocaine, morphine and food reward. Life Sci 56:2073–2080
Lepore M, Liu X, Savage V, Matalon D, Gardner EL (1996) Genetic differences in Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol-induced facilitation of brain stimulation reward as measured by a rate–frequency curve-shift electrical brain stimulation paradigm in three different rat strains. Life Sci 58:365–372
Liebman JM (1983) Discriminating between reward and performance: a critical review of intracranial self-stimulation methodology. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 7:45–72
Maldonado-Irizarry CS, Stellar JR, Kelley AE (1994) Effects of cocaine and GBR-12909 on brain stimulation reward. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 48:915–920
Mallet PE, Benninger RJ (1998) Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, but not the endogenous cannabinoid receptor ligand anandamide, produces conditioned place avoidance. Life Sci 62:2431–2439
Mansbach RS, Nicholson KL, Martin BR, Balster RL (1994) Failure of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and CP 55,940 to maintain intravenous self-administration under a fixed-interval schedule in rhesus monkeys. Behav Pharmacol 5:210–225
Markou A, Koob GF (1992) Construct validity of a self-stimulation threshold paradigm: effects of reward and performance manipulations. Physiol Behav 51:111–119
Markou A, Koob GF (1993) Intracranial self-stimulation thresholds are a measure of reward. In: Saghal A (ed) Behavioral neuroscience: a practical approach, vol II. IRL, Oxford, pp 93–115
Martellotta MC, Cossu G, Fattore L, Gessa GL, Fratta W (1998) Self-administration of the cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 in drug-naive mice. Neuroscience 85:327–330
Martin BR, Compton DR, Thomas BF, Prescott WR, Little PJ, Razdan RK, Johnson MR, Melvin LS, Mechoulam R, Ward SJ (1991) Behavioral, biochemical, and molecular modeling evaluations of cannabinoid analogs. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 40:471–478
Matsuda LA, Lolait SJ, Brownstein MJ, Young AC, Bonner TI (1990) Structure of a cannabinoid receptor and functional expression of the cloned cDNA. Nature 346:561–564
McGregor IS, Issakidis CN, Prior G (1996) Aversive effects of the synthetic cannabinoid CP 55,940 in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 53:657–664
Mechoulam R, Ben-Shabat S, Hanus L, Ligumsky M, Kaminski NE, Schatz AR, Gopher A, Almog S, Martin BR, Compton DR, Pertwee RG, Griffin G, Bayewitch M, Barg J, Vogel Z (1995) Identification of an endogenous 2-monoglyceride, present in canine gut, that binds to cannabinoid receptors. Biochem Pharmacol 50:83–90
Miliaressis E, Rompré P-P (1987) Effects of concomitant motor reactions on the measurement of rewarding efficacy of brain stimulation. Behav Neurosci 101:827–831
Miliaressis E, Rompré PP, Laviolette P, Philippe L, Coulombe D (1986) The curve-shift paradigm in self-stimulation. Physiol Behav 37:85–91
Mo FM, Offertáler L, Kunos G (2004) Atypical cannabinoid stimulates endothelial cell migration via a Gi/Go-coupled receptor distinct from CB1, CB2 or EDG-1. Eur J Pharmacol 489:21–27
Munro S, Thomas KL, Abu SM (1993) Molecular characterization of a peripheral receptor for cannabinoids. Nature 365:61–65
Palmer SL, Thakur GA, Makriyiannis A (2002) Cannabinergic ligands. Chem Phys Lipids 121:3–19
Panagis G, Spyraki C (1996) Neuropharmacological evidence for the role of dopamine in ventral pallidum self-stimulation. Psychopharmacology 123:280–288
Panagis G, Kastellakis A, Spyraki C, Nomikos G (2000) Effects of methyllycaconitine (MLA), an α7 nicotinic receptor antagonist, on nicotine- and cocaine-induced potentiation of brain stimulation reward. Psychopharmacology 149:388–396
Parker LA, Gillies T (1995) THC-induced place and taste aversions in Lewis and Sprague–Dawley rats. Behav Neurosci 109:71–78
Paxinos G, Watson C (1998) The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates, 4th edn. Academic, San Diego
Pertwee RG (1999) Pharmacology of cannabinoid receptor ligands. Curr Med Chem 6:635–664
Porter AC, Felder CC (2001) The endocannabinoid nervous system: unique opportunities for therapeutic intervention. Pharmacol Ther 90:45–60
Porter AC, Sauer JM, Knierman MD, Becker GW, Berna MJ, Bao J, Nomikos GG, Carter P, Bymaster FP, Leese AB, Felder CC (2002) Characterization of a novel endocannabinoid, virodhamine, with antagonist activity at the CB1 receptor. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 301:1020–1024
Ranaldi R, Beninger RJ (1994) The effects of systemic and intracerebral injections of D1 and D2 agonists on brain stimulation reward. Brain Res 651:283–292
Rinaldi-Carmona M, Barth F, Héaulme M, Shire D, Calandra B, Congry C, Martinez S, Maruani J, Néliat G, Caput D et al. (1994) SR141716A, a potent and selective antagonist of the brain cannabinoid receptor. FEBS Lett 350:240–244
Robinson L, Hinder L, Pertwee RG, Riedel G (2003) Effects of Δ9-THC and WIN 55,212-2 on place preference in the water maze in rats. Psychopharmacology 166:40–50
Romero J, Lastres-Becker I, De Miguel R, Berrendero F, Ramos, JA, Fernández-Ruiz J (2002) The endogenous cannabinoid system and the basal ganglia: biochemical, pharmacological, and therapeutic aspects. Pharmacol Ther 95:137–152
Rompré PP, Wise RA (1989) Opioid-neuroleptic interaction in brainstem self-stimulation. Brain Res 477:144–151
Russo EB, McPartland JM (1993) Cannabis is more than simply Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol. Psychopharmacology 165:431–432
Sañudo-Pena MC, Tsou K, Delay ER, Hohman AG, Force M, Walker M (1997) Endogenous cannabinoids as an aversive or counter-rewarding system in the rat. Neurosci Lett 223:125–128
Solinas M, Panlilio LV, Antoniou K, Pappas LA, Goldberg SR (2003) The cannabinoid CB1 antagonist N-piperidinyl-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methylpyrazole-3-carboxamide (SR-141716A) differentially alters the reinforcing effects of heroin under continuous reinforcement, fixed ratio, and progressive ratio schedules of drug self-administration in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 306(1):93–102
Stark P, Dews PB (1980) Cannabinoids: behavioral effects. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 214:124–130
Stellar JR, Rice MB (1989) Pharmacological basis of intracranial self-stimulation reward. In: Liebman JM, Cooper SJ (eds) The neuropharmacological basis of reward. Oxford Science, Oxford, pp 14–65
Takahashi RN, Singer G (1979) Self-administration of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol by rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 11:737–740
Tanda G, Goldberg SR (2003) Cannabinoids: reward, dependence, and underlying neurochemical mechanisms—a review of recent preclinical data. Psychopharmacology 169:115–134
Tanda G, Munzar P, Goldberg SR (2000) Self-administration behavior is maintained by the psychoactive ingredient of marijuana in squirrel monkeys. Nat Neurosci 3:1073–1074
Valjent E, Maldonado R (2000) A behavioral model to reveal place preference to Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol in mice. Psychopharmacology 147:436–438
Van Ree JM, Slangen J, de Wied D (1978) Intravenous self-administration of drugs in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 20:547–557
Vlachou S, Nomikos GG, Panagis G (2003) WIN 55,212-2 decreases the reinforcing actions of cocaine through CB1 cannabinoid receptor stimulation. Behav Brain Res 141:215–222
Wasserman EM, Gomita Y, Gallistel CR (1982) Pimozide blocks reinforcement but not priming from MFB stimulation in the rat. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 17:783–787
Wise RA (1980) Action of drugs of abuse on brain reward systems. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 13(1):213–223
Wise RA (1982) Neuroleptics and operant behavior: the anhedonia hypothesis. Behav Brain Sci 5:39–87
Wise RA (1996) Addictive drugs and brain stimulation reward. Annu Rev Neurosci 19:319–340
Wise RA (1998) Drug-activation of brain reward pathways. Drug Alcohol Depend 51:13–22
Wise RA, Rompré PP (1989) Brain dopamine and reward. Annu Rev Psychol 40:191–225
Wise R, Marcangione C, Bauco P (1998) Blockade of the reward-potentiating effect of nicotine on lateral hypothalamic brain stimulation by chlorisondamine. Synapse 29:72–79
Zimmer A, Zimmer AM, Hobmann AG, Henkenham M, Bonner TI (1999) Increased mortality, hypoactivity, and hypoalgesia in cannabinoid CB1 receptor knockout mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:5780–5785
Zygmunt PM, Andersson DA, Högestätt ED (2002) Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabinol activate capsaicin-sensitive sensory nerves via a CB1 and CB2 cannabinoid receptor-independent mechanism. J Neurosci 22:4720–4727
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by a grant from the General Secreteriat of Research and Technology of Greece—European Commission (EPAN—YB/60). Vlachou Styliani was supported by a scholarship from PROPONTIS Foundation. We thank A. Galanopoulos and F. Stamatopoulou for their assistance in the conduction of some experiments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vlachou, S., Nomikos, G.G. & Panagis, G. CB1 cannabinoid receptor agonists increase intracranial self-stimulation thresholds in the rat. Psychopharmacology 179, 498–508 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-004-2050-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-004-2050-0