Skip to main content
Log in

Neural correlates of conflict processing

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study we examined the neural correlates of conflict processing in the Stroop, counting, and digit-location tasks using event-related brain potentials (ERPs). The behavioral data revealed robust interference in response time and accuracy for all tasks. The interference effect for response time was greater in the Stroop task than the other tasks; in contrast, the interference effect for response accuracy was greater in the counting tasks than the other tasks. The N450 and sustained potential (SP) were elicited in each task. Partial least-squares (PLS) analysis was used to examine the structural relationships between the ERPs, task design, and behavior. TaskPLS analysis revealed that the N450 and SP were associated with a single latent variable leading to the suggestion that a common set of neural generators was recruited during conflict processing across the tasks and that there were differences between ERPs related to early processing across the three tasks. BehavioralPLS analysis revealed that the amplitude of the SP was positively correlated with response time and accuracy, indicating that this modulation of the ERPs may be related to response selection rather than to conflict resolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banich MT, Milham MP, Atchley R, Cohen NJ, Webb A, Wszalek T, Kramer AF, Liang Z-P, Wright A, Shenker J, Magin R (2000) FMRI studies of Stroop tasks reveal unique roles of anterior and posterior brain systems in attentional selection. J Cogn Neurosci 12:988–1000

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Botvinick MM, Braver TS, Barch DM, Carter CS, Cohen JD (2001) Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol Rev 108:624–652

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Braver TS, Barch DM, Gray JR, Molfese DL, Snyder A (2001) Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: Effects of frequency, inhibition and errors. Cereb Cortex 11:825–836

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bush G, Whalen PJ, Rosen BR, Jenike MA, McInerney SC, Rauch SL (1998) The counting Stroop: an interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging—validation study with functional MRI. Hum Brain Mapp 6:270–282

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carter CS, MacDonald AM, Botvinick MM, Ross LL, Stenger A, Noll D, Cohen JD (2000) Parsing executive processes: Strategic versus evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:1944–1948

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen JD, Servan-Schreiber D (1992) Context, cortex, and dopamine: a connectionist approach to behavior and biology in schizophrenia. Psychol Rev 99:45–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen JD, Dunbar K, McClelland JL (1990) On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychol Rev 97:332–361

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Comalli PE Jr, Wapner S, Werner H (1962) Interference effects of Stroop Color-Word Test in childhood, adulthood, and aging. J Genet Psychol 100:47–53

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dien J, Frishkoff GA (2004) Principal components analysis of event-related potential datasets. In: Handy T (ed) Event-related potentials: A methods handbook. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, pp 189–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan-Johnson CC, Kopell BS (1981) The Stroop effect: brain potentials localize the source of interference. Science 214:938–940

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen BA, Eriksen CE (1974) Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Percept Psychophys 16:143–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan J, Flombaum JI, McCandliss BD, Thomas KM, Posner MI (2003) Cognitive and brain consequences of conflict. NeuroImage 18:42–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gehring WJ, Gratton G, Coles MGH, Donchin E (1992) Probability effects on stimulus evaluation and response processes. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18:198–216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gehring WJ, Goss B, Coles MGH, Meyer DE, Donchin E (1993) A neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychol Sci 4:385–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hentschel U (1973) Two new interference tests compared to the Stroop color-word test. Psychol Res Bull, Lund Univ 13:1–24 (From Psychological Abstracts, 1974, 51, Abstract No. 8163)

  • Huynh H, Feldt LS (1976) Estimation of the box correction for degrees of freedom from sample data in the randomized block and split-plot designs. J Educ Stat 1:69–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings JR (1987) Editorial policy on analyses of variance with repeated measures. Psychophysiology 24:474–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopp B, Rist F, Mattler U (1996) N200 in the flanker task as a neurobehavioral tool for investigating executive control. Psychophysiology 33:282–294

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liotti M, Woldorff MG, Perez R III, Mayberg HS (2000) An ERP study of the temporal course of the Stroop color-word interference effect. Neuropsychologia 38:701–711

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lobaugh NJ, West R, McIntosh AR (2001) Spatiotemporal analysis of experimental differences in event-related potential data with partial least-squares. Psychophysiology 38:517–530

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod CM (1991) Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychol Bull 109:163–203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Markela-Lerenc J, Ille N, Kaiser S, Fiedler P, Mundt C, Weisbrod M (2004). Prefrontal-cingulate activation during executive control: which comes first?. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 18:278–287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh AR, Bookstein FL, Haxby JV, Grady CL (1996) Spatial pattern analysis of functional images using partial least-squares. Neuroimage 3:143–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwenhuis S, Yeung N, van den Wildenberg W, Ridderinkhof KR (2003) Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a Go/No-Go task: effects of response conflict and trial-type frequency. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 3:17–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pardo JV, Pardo JP, Janer KW, Raichle ME (1990) The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:256–259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perlstein WM, Carter CS, Barch DM, Baird JW (1998) The Stroop task and attention deficits in schizophrenia: a critical evaluation of card and single-trial Stroop methodologies. Neuropsychology 12:414–425

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perret E (1974) The left frontal lobe of man and the suppression of habitual responses in verbal categorical behaviour. Neuropsychologia 12:323–330

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salthouse TA, Meinz EJ (1995) Aging, inhibition, working memory, and speed. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 50B:297–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Shilling VM, Chetwynd A, Rabbitt PM (2002) Individual inconsistency across measures of inhibition: an investigation of the construct validity of inhibition in older adults. Neuropsychologia 40:605–619

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stroop JR (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol 18:643–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullsperger M, van Cramon DY (2001) Subprocesses of performance monitoring: a dissocation of error processing and response competition revealed by event-related fMRI and ERPs. NeuroImage 14:1387–1401

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Urbach TP, Kutas M (2002) The intractability of scaling scalp distributions to infer neuroelectric sources. Psychophysiology 39:791–808

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Veen V, Carter CS (2002) The timing of action-monitoring processes in the anterior cingulate cortex. J Cogn Neurosci 15:593–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhaeghen P, De Meersman L (1998) Aging and the Stroop effect: a meta-analysis. Psychol Aging 13:120–126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • West R (2003) Neural correlates of cognitive control and conflict detection in the stroop and digit-location tasks. Neuropsychologia 41:1122–1135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • West R, Alain C (2000) Effects of task context and fluctuations of attention on neural activity supporting performance of the Stroop task. Brain Res 873:102–111

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • West R, Bowry R, McConville C (2004) Sensitivity of medial frontal cortex to response and non-response conflict. Psychophysiology 41:739–748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wold H (1975) Path models with latent variables: The NIPALS approach. In: Blalock HM, Aganbegian A, Borodkin FM, Boudon R, Cappecchi V (eds) Quantitative sociology: International perspectives on mathematical and statistical modeling. Academic Press, NY, USA, pp 307–357

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the Faculty Research Program of The University of Notre Dame. We would like to thank Nancy Lobaugh for invaluable discussion related to the analysis and interpretation of the results of PLS analyses. Robert West, 118 Haggar Hall, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA. Email West.19@nd.edu.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert West.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

West, R., Jakubek, K., Wymbs, N. et al. Neural correlates of conflict processing. Exp Brain Res 167, 38–48 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-2366-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-2366-y

Keywords

Navigation