Abstract
In this study we examined the neural correlates of conflict processing in the Stroop, counting, and digit-location tasks using event-related brain potentials (ERPs). The behavioral data revealed robust interference in response time and accuracy for all tasks. The interference effect for response time was greater in the Stroop task than the other tasks; in contrast, the interference effect for response accuracy was greater in the counting tasks than the other tasks. The N450 and sustained potential (SP) were elicited in each task. Partial least-squares (PLS) analysis was used to examine the structural relationships between the ERPs, task design, and behavior. TaskPLS analysis revealed that the N450 and SP were associated with a single latent variable leading to the suggestion that a common set of neural generators was recruited during conflict processing across the tasks and that there were differences between ERPs related to early processing across the three tasks. BehavioralPLS analysis revealed that the amplitude of the SP was positively correlated with response time and accuracy, indicating that this modulation of the ERPs may be related to response selection rather than to conflict resolution.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banich MT, Milham MP, Atchley R, Cohen NJ, Webb A, Wszalek T, Kramer AF, Liang Z-P, Wright A, Shenker J, Magin R (2000) FMRI studies of Stroop tasks reveal unique roles of anterior and posterior brain systems in attentional selection. J Cogn Neurosci 12:988–1000
Botvinick MM, Braver TS, Barch DM, Carter CS, Cohen JD (2001) Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol Rev 108:624–652
Braver TS, Barch DM, Gray JR, Molfese DL, Snyder A (2001) Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: Effects of frequency, inhibition and errors. Cereb Cortex 11:825–836
Bush G, Whalen PJ, Rosen BR, Jenike MA, McInerney SC, Rauch SL (1998) The counting Stroop: an interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging—validation study with functional MRI. Hum Brain Mapp 6:270–282
Carter CS, MacDonald AM, Botvinick MM, Ross LL, Stenger A, Noll D, Cohen JD (2000) Parsing executive processes: Strategic versus evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:1944–1948
Cohen JD, Servan-Schreiber D (1992) Context, cortex, and dopamine: a connectionist approach to behavior and biology in schizophrenia. Psychol Rev 99:45–77
Cohen JD, Dunbar K, McClelland JL (1990) On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychol Rev 97:332–361
Comalli PE Jr, Wapner S, Werner H (1962) Interference effects of Stroop Color-Word Test in childhood, adulthood, and aging. J Genet Psychol 100:47–53
Dien J, Frishkoff GA (2004) Principal components analysis of event-related potential datasets. In: Handy T (ed) Event-related potentials: A methods handbook. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, pp 189–208
Duncan-Johnson CC, Kopell BS (1981) The Stroop effect: brain potentials localize the source of interference. Science 214:938–940
Eriksen BA, Eriksen CE (1974) Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Percept Psychophys 16:143–149
Fan J, Flombaum JI, McCandliss BD, Thomas KM, Posner MI (2003) Cognitive and brain consequences of conflict. NeuroImage 18:42–57
Gehring WJ, Gratton G, Coles MGH, Donchin E (1992) Probability effects on stimulus evaluation and response processes. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18:198–216
Gehring WJ, Goss B, Coles MGH, Meyer DE, Donchin E (1993) A neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychol Sci 4:385–390
Hentschel U (1973) Two new interference tests compared to the Stroop color-word test. Psychol Res Bull, Lund Univ 13:1–24 (From Psychological Abstracts, 1974, 51, Abstract No. 8163)
Huynh H, Feldt LS (1976) Estimation of the box correction for degrees of freedom from sample data in the randomized block and split-plot designs. J Educ Stat 1:69–82
Jennings JR (1987) Editorial policy on analyses of variance with repeated measures. Psychophysiology 24:474–475
Kopp B, Rist F, Mattler U (1996) N200 in the flanker task as a neurobehavioral tool for investigating executive control. Psychophysiology 33:282–294
Liotti M, Woldorff MG, Perez R III, Mayberg HS (2000) An ERP study of the temporal course of the Stroop color-word interference effect. Neuropsychologia 38:701–711
Lobaugh NJ, West R, McIntosh AR (2001) Spatiotemporal analysis of experimental differences in event-related potential data with partial least-squares. Psychophysiology 38:517–530
MacLeod CM (1991) Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychol Bull 109:163–203
Markela-Lerenc J, Ille N, Kaiser S, Fiedler P, Mundt C, Weisbrod M (2004). Prefrontal-cingulate activation during executive control: which comes first?. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 18:278–287
McIntosh AR, Bookstein FL, Haxby JV, Grady CL (1996) Spatial pattern analysis of functional images using partial least-squares. Neuroimage 3:143–157
Nieuwenhuis S, Yeung N, van den Wildenberg W, Ridderinkhof KR (2003) Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a Go/No-Go task: effects of response conflict and trial-type frequency. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 3:17–26
Pardo JV, Pardo JP, Janer KW, Raichle ME (1990) The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:256–259
Perlstein WM, Carter CS, Barch DM, Baird JW (1998) The Stroop task and attention deficits in schizophrenia: a critical evaluation of card and single-trial Stroop methodologies. Neuropsychology 12:414–425
Perret E (1974) The left frontal lobe of man and the suppression of habitual responses in verbal categorical behaviour. Neuropsychologia 12:323–330
Salthouse TA, Meinz EJ (1995) Aging, inhibition, working memory, and speed. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 50B:297–306
Shilling VM, Chetwynd A, Rabbitt PM (2002) Individual inconsistency across measures of inhibition: an investigation of the construct validity of inhibition in older adults. Neuropsychologia 40:605–619
Stroop JR (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol 18:643–662
Ullsperger M, van Cramon DY (2001) Subprocesses of performance monitoring: a dissocation of error processing and response competition revealed by event-related fMRI and ERPs. NeuroImage 14:1387–1401
Urbach TP, Kutas M (2002) The intractability of scaling scalp distributions to infer neuroelectric sources. Psychophysiology 39:791–808
van Veen V, Carter CS (2002) The timing of action-monitoring processes in the anterior cingulate cortex. J Cogn Neurosci 15:593–602
Verhaeghen P, De Meersman L (1998) Aging and the Stroop effect: a meta-analysis. Psychol Aging 13:120–126
West R (2003) Neural correlates of cognitive control and conflict detection in the stroop and digit-location tasks. Neuropsychologia 41:1122–1135
West R, Alain C (2000) Effects of task context and fluctuations of attention on neural activity supporting performance of the Stroop task. Brain Res 873:102–111
West R, Bowry R, McConville C (2004) Sensitivity of medial frontal cortex to response and non-response conflict. Psychophysiology 41:739–748
Wold H (1975) Path models with latent variables: The NIPALS approach. In: Blalock HM, Aganbegian A, Borodkin FM, Boudon R, Cappecchi V (eds) Quantitative sociology: International perspectives on mathematical and statistical modeling. Academic Press, NY, USA, pp 307–357
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a grant from the Faculty Research Program of The University of Notre Dame. We would like to thank Nancy Lobaugh for invaluable discussion related to the analysis and interpretation of the results of PLS analyses. Robert West, 118 Haggar Hall, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA. Email West.19@nd.edu.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
West, R., Jakubek, K., Wymbs, N. et al. Neural correlates of conflict processing. Exp Brain Res 167, 38–48 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-2366-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-2366-y