Skip to main content
Log in

Interpersonal memory-based guidance of attention is reduced for ingroup members

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Participants jointly engaged in common tasks with co-actors can be influenced in guiding their own attention by representations of what the co-actor also holds in memory (He et al. under review). This demonstrates an effect of interpersonal memory on attention. Here, we tested how this interpersonal memory effect is affected by the relationship between the actors. Participants searched for targets while maintaining images in working memory or after previewed images that co-actors had to memorise. We examined three groups: Caucasian strangers (low ingroup relations) and two other groups with likely higher ingroup relations (Caucasian friends and Chinese participants living in Britain). In all three groups, attention was directed to stimuli that matched the item the individual had to memorise. However, images that had to be memorised by co-actors only attracted the attention of Caucasian strangers but not the Caucasian friends and Chinese participants. We suggest that interpersonal memory-based guidance of attention is modulated by the nature of the relationship between individuals and reduces when individuals have higher ingroup relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Friends may show greater involvement (competition) in a competitive game. However there is overwhelming prior evidence indicating that increased cooperation is more likely in non-competitive situations as in the present study (where no performance feedback was given).

References

  • Andersen SM, Chen S (2002) The relational self: an interpersonal social-cognitive theory. Psychol Rev 109:619–645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson J, Rönnberg J (1995) Recall suffers from collaboration: joint recall effects of friendship and task complexity. Appl Cogn Psychol 9:199–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aron A, Aron EN, Tudor M, Nelson G (1991) Close relationships as including other in the self. J Personal Soc Psychol 60:241–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister RF (1982) A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychol Bull 91:3–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böckler A, Knoblich G, Sebanz N (2010) Socializing cognition. In: Glatzeder BM, Goel V, Müller A (eds) Towards a theory of thinking. Springer, Berlin, pp 233–250

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bond CF Jr, Titus LJ (1983) Social facilitation: a meta-analysis of 241 studies. Psychol Bull 94:265–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bond MH, Yang KS (1982) Ethnic affirmation versus cross-cultural accommodation: the variable impact of questionnaire language on Chinese bilinguals from Hong Kong. J Cross Cult Psychol 13:169–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brass M, Derrfuss J, von Cramon DY (2005) The inhibition of imitative and overlearned responses: a functional double dissociation. Neuropsychologia 43:89–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer MB, Kramer RM (1985) The psychology of intergroup attitudes and behavior. Annu Rev Psychol 36:219–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer MB, Yuki M (2007) Culture and social identity. In: Kitayama S, Cohen D (eds) Handbook of cultural psychology. Guilford Press, London, pp 307–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Briley DA, Wyer RS Jr (2002) The effect of group membership salience on the avoidance of negative outcomes: implications for social and consumer decisions. J Consum Res 27:157–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cave KR, Bichot NP (1999) Visuospatial attention: beyond a spotlight model. Psychonom Bull Rev 6:204–223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chartrand TL, Bargh JA (1999) The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. J Personal Soc Psychol 76:893–910

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chelazzi L, Miller EK, Duncan J, Desimone R (1993) A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex. Nature 363:345–347

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Bruijn ERA, Miedl SF, Bekkering H (2008) Fast responders have blinders on: ERP correlates of response inhibition in competition. Cortex 44:580–586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Downing PE (2000) Interactions between visual working memory and selective attention. Psychol Sci 11:467–473

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Echterhoff G, Higgins ET, Groll S (2005) Audience-tuning effects on memory: the role of shared reality. J Personal Soc Psychol 89:257–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echterhoff G, Higgins ET, Kopietz R, Groll S (2008) How communication goals determine when audience tuning biases memory. J Exp Psychol Gen 137:3–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eilan N, Hoerl C, McCormack T, Roessler J (2004) Joint attention: communication and other minds. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen CW, Yeh Y (1985) Allocation of attention in the visual field. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 11:583–597

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frischen A, Loach D, Tipper SP (2009) Seeing the world through another person’s eyes: simulating selective attention via action observation. Cognition 111:212–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Han SW, Kim M-S (2009) Do the contents of working memory capture attention? Yes, but cognitive control matters. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 35:1292–1302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández M, Humphreys GW, Costa A (in press) Escaping capture: bilingualism modulates distraction from working memory. Cognition

  • Hogg MA (2004) Social identity, self-categorization, and communication in small groups. In: Ng S-H, Candlin CN, Chiu C-y (eds) Language matters: communication, culture, and identity. City University of Hong Kong Press, Hong Kong, pp 221–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingshead AB (2000) Perceptions of expertise and transactive memory in work relationships. Group Proc Intergr Relat 3:257–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel B, Colzato LS, van den Wildenberg WPM (2009) How social are task representations? Psychol Sci 20:794–798

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hong Y-y, Morris MW, Chiu C-y, Martínez V (2000) Multicultural minds: a dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. Am Psychol 55:709–720

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D (1973) Attention and effort. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmelmeier M, Cheng BY-M (2004) Language and self-construal priming: a replication and extension in a Hong Kong sample. J Cross Cult Psychol 35:705–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoblich G, Jordan S (2003) Action coordination in individuals and groups: learning anticipatory control. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 29:1006–1016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knoblich G, Sebanz N (2006) The social nature of perception and action. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 15:99–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoblich G, Sebanz N (2008) Evolving intentions for social interaction: from entrainment to joint action. Philos Trans R Soc Lon B Biol Sci 363:2021–2031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer RM, Brewer MB (1984) Effects of group identity on resource use in a simulated commons dilemma. J Personal Soc Psychol 46:1044–1057

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Markus HR, Uchida Y, Omoregie H, Townsend SSM, Kitayama S (2007) Going for the gold: models of agency in Japanese and American contexts. Psychol Sci 17:103–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendes WB, Major B, McCoy S, Blascovich J (2008) How attributional ambiguity shapes physiological and emotional responses to social rejection and acceptance. J Personal Soc Psychol 94:278–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller JH, Thompson WB (1984) Test anxiety and distinctiveness of personal information. In: Ploeg HM, Schwarzer R, Spielberger CD (eds) Advances in test anxiety research, vol 3. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 21–37

  • Olivers CNL, Meijer F, Theeuwes J (2006) Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: visual working memory content affects visual attention. J Exp Psycho Hum Percept Perform 32:1243–1265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pashler H, Johnston JC, Ruthruff E (2001) Attention and performance. Annu Rev Psychol 52:629–651

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ross M, Xun WQE, Wilson AE (2002) Language and the bicultural self. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 28:1040–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruby P, Decety J (2001) Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: A PET investigation of agency. Nat Neurosci 4:546–550

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schuch S, Tipper SP (2007) On observing another person’s actions: influences of observed inhibition and errors. Percept Psychophys 69:828–837

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sebanz N, Knoblich G, Prinz W (2003) Representing others’ actions: just like one’s own? Cognition 88:B11–B21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sebanz N, Knoblich G, Prinz W (2005) How two share a task: corepresenting stimulus-response mappings. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 31:1234–1246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sebanz N, Bekkering H, Knoblich G (2006) Joint action: bodies and minds moving together. Trends Cogn Sci 10:70–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shteynberg G (2010) A silent emergence of culture: the social tuning effect. J Personal Soc Psychol 99:683–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon JR (1969) Reactions towards the source of stimulation. J Exp Psychol 81:174–176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soto D, Heinke D, Humphreys GW, Blanco MJ (2005) Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 31:248–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soto D, Humphreys GW, Heinke D (2006a) Dividing the mind: the necessary role of the frontal lobes in separating memory from search. Neuropsychologia 44:1282–1289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soto D, Humphreys GW, Heinke D (2006b) Working memory can guide pop-out search. Vis Res 46:1010–1018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soto D, Hodsoll J, Rotshtein P, Humphreys GW (2008) Automatic guidance of attention from working memory. Trends Cogn Sci 12:342–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan WG, Stephan CW (1985) Intergroup anxiety. J Soc Issues 41:157–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel H (1982) Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annu Rev Psychol 33:1–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel H, Billig M, Bundy R, Flament C (1971) Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. Eur J Soc Psychol 1:149–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tice DM, Butler JL, Muraven MB, Stillwell AM (1995) When modesty prevails: differential favorability of self-presentation to friends and strangers. J Personal Soc Psychol 69:1120–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tong Y-Y, Hong Y-Y, Lee S-L, Chiu C-Y (1999) Language use as a carrier of social identity. Int J Intercult Relat 23:281–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triandis HC (1995) Individualism and collectivism. Westview, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai C-C, Brass M (2007) Does the human motor system simulate Pinocchio’s action? Coacting with a human hand versus a wooden hand in a dyadic interaction. Psychol Sci 18:1058–1062

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vohs KD, Baumeister RF, Ciarocco NJ (2005) Self-regulation and self-presentation: regulatory resource depletion impairs impression management and effortful self-presentation depletes regulatory resources. J Personal Soc Psychol 88:632–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegner DM (1986) Transactive memory: a contemporary analysis of the group mind. In: Mullen B, Goethals GR (eds) Theories of group behaviour. Springer, New York, pp 185–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegner DM, Erber R, Raymond P (1991) Transactive memory in close relationships. J Personal Soc Psychol 61:923–929

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh TN, Elliott D, Anson JG, Dhillon V, Weeks DJ, Lyons JL, Chua R (2005) Does Joe influence Fred’s action? Inhibition of return across different nervous systems. Neurosci Lett 385:99–104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh TN, Lyons J, Weeks DJ, Anson JG, Chua R, Mendoza J, Elliott D (2007) Within- and between-nervous-system inhibition of return: observation is as good as performance. Psychonom Bull Rev 14:950–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams M (2001) In whom we trust: group membership as an affective context for trust development. Acad Manag Rev 26:377–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Yantis S (1998) Control of visual attention. In: Pashler H (ed) Attention. Psychology Press, Hove, pp 223–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc R (1965) Social facilitation. Science 149:269–274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from the Economic and Social Research Council, UK.

Ethical statements

The study has been approved by the Ethics Committee in University of Birmingham and hence been performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki standards. All participants gave informed consent prior to their participation in the study. The authors do not have any financial relationship with the organisation that sponsored the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xun He.

Additional information

Part of this study was reported in the 7th International Conference on Cognitive Science (August 2010) and in a British Neuropsychological Society meeting (October 2010).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

He, X., Lever, A.G. & Humphreys, G.W. Interpersonal memory-based guidance of attention is reduced for ingroup members. Exp Brain Res 211, 429–438 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2698-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2698-8

Keywords

Navigation