Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy: technique, indications and clinical follow-up in over 1000 patients

  • Interventional Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper summarises my experience, over 14 years, treating over 1350 patients suffering from lumbar disc pathology, using minimally invasive intradiscal decompressive percutaneous techniques. The vast majority underwent the method introduced by Onik in 1985, referred to as "automated" since it involves a mechanical probe, working by a "suction and cutting" action for removal of the nucleus pulposus. Postoperative follow-up of at least 6 months was available for 1047 patients aged 15–92 years, who underwent this procedure up to June 2002. Results, based on a patient satisfaction, have been good in 58% of patients at 2 months and in 67.5% at 6 months; they have been particularly favourable in some subgroups such as elderly people (79.5% of excellent or good results), patients previously operated upon (78%) and those with "discogenic" low back pain (79%). Complication rates have been extremely low (less than 1%) and all complications cleared up without sequelae. In comparison with other percutaneous disc treatments, Onik's achieves the best compromise between clinical efficacy, comfort for the patient and low invasiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2a, b.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smith L, Garvin PJ, Jennings RB (1963) Enzyme dissolution of nucleus pulposus. Nature 198: 1398–1400

    Google Scholar 

  2. Smith L (1964) Enzyme dissolution of nucleus pulposus in humans. JAMA 187: 137–140

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Choy DS (1998) Percutaneous laser disc compression (PLDD): twelve years' experience with 752 procedures in 518 patients. J Clin Laser Med Surg 16: 325–31

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Friedman WA (1983) Percutaneous discectomy. An alternative to chemonucleolysis? Neurosurgery 13: 542–547

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hijikata S, Yamagishi M, Nakayama T, Oomori K (1975) Percutaneous nucleotomy: a new treatment method for lumbar disk herniation. J Toden Hosp 5: 5–13

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hijikata S (1989) Percutaneous nucleotomy: a new concept technique and 12 years' experience. Clin Orthop 238: 9–23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kambin P, Gellmann H (1983) Percutaneous lateral discectomy of the lumbar spine. A preliminary report. Clin Orthop 174: 127–132

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schreiber A, Suezawa Y (1986) Transdiscoscopic percutaneous nucleotomy in disc herniation. Orthop Rev 15: 75–78

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yeung AT (2000) The evolution of percutaneous spinal endoscopy and discectomy: state of the art. Mt Sinai J Med 67: 327–32

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lucas PR (1983) Low back pain. Surg Clin North Am 63: 515–528

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Belloni G, Bonaldi G, Moschini L, Porta M (1989) La discectomia percutanea per aspirazione. Riv Neuroradiol 1: 91–100

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bocchi L, Ferrata P, Passarello F, et al (1989) La nucleoaspirazione secondo Onik nel trattamento dell'ernia discale lombare. Analisi multicentrica dei primi risultati su oltre 650 trattamenti. Riv Neuroradiol 2 [Suppl 1]: 119–122

  13. Bonaldi G, Belloni G, Prosetti D, Moschini L (1991) Percutaneous discectomy using Onik's method: 3 years' experience. Neuroradiology 33: 516–519

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bonaldi G, Minonzio G, Belloni G, et al 1994) Percutaneous cervical diskectomy: preliminary technical experience. Neuroradiology 36: 483–486

    Google Scholar 

  15. Onik G, Helms CA, Ginsburg L, Hoaglund FT, Morris J (1985) Percutaneous lumbar diskectomy using a new aspiration probe. AJNR 6: 290–293

    Google Scholar 

  16. Maroon JC, Onik G (1987) Percutaneous automated discectomy: a new method for lumbar disc removal. J Neurosurg 66: 143–146

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Onik G, Maroon JC, Helms CA, et al (1987) Automated percutaneous discectomy: initial patient experience. Radiology 162: 129–132

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Milette PC (1997) The proper terminology for reporting lumbar intervertebral disk disorders. AJNR 8: 1859–1866

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fardon DF, Milette PC (2001) Nomenclature and classification of lumbar disc pathology. Recommendations of the Combined Task Forces of the North American Spine Society, American Society of Spine Radiology, and American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine 26: E93-E113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fardon DF, Milette PC (2003) Nomenclature and classification of lumbar disc pathology—recommendations of the Combined Task Forces of the North American Spine Society, American Society of Spine Radiology, and American Society of Neuroradiology. American Society of Neuroradiology, www.asnr.org

  21. Onik G (1988) Percutaneous automated discectomy: technique. In: Onik G, Helms CA (eds) Automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy. Radiology Research and Education Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, pp 77–110

  22. Shea M, Takeuchi TY, Wittenberg RH, White AA 3 rd, Hayes WC (1994) A comparison of the effects of automated percutaneous diskectomy and conventional diskectomy on intradiscal pressure, disk geometry, and stiffness. J Spinal Disord 7: 317–325

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Castro WH, Jerosch J, Hepp R, Schulitz KP (1992) Restriction of indication for automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy based on computed tomographic discography. Spine 17: 1239–1243

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Moon CT, Cho J, Chang SK (1995) Availability of discographic computed tomography in automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy. J Korean Med Sci 10: 368–372

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dullerud R, Amundsen T, Lie H, Juel NG, Magnaes B (1995) CT-diskography, diskomanometry and MR imaging as predictors of the outcome of lumbar percutaneous automated nucleotomy. Acta Radiol 36: 613–619

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Onik GM (2000) Percutaneous diskectomy in the treatment of herniated lumbar disks. Neuroimaging Clin North Am 10: 597–607

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Milette PC, Raymond J, Fontaine S (1990) Comparison of high-resolution computed tomography with discography in the evaluation of lumbar disc herniations. Spine 15: 525–533

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Milette PC, Fontaine S, Lepanto L, Breton G (1995) Radiating pain to the lower extremities caused by lumbar disk rupture without spinal nerve root involvement. AJNR 16: 1605–1615

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Milette PC, Fontaine S, Lepanto L, Cardinal E, Breton G (1999) Differentiating lumbar disc protrusions, disc bulges, and discs with normal contour but abnormal signal intensity. Magnetic resonance imaging with discographic correlations. Spine 24: 44–53

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Modic MT, Masaryk TJ, Ross JS, Carter JR (1988) Imaging of degenerative disk disease. Radiology 168: 177–186

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Modic MT, Steinberg PM, Ross JS, Masaryk TJ, Carter JR (1988) Degenerative disc disease. Assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MRI. Imaging Radiology 166: 194–199

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kieffer SA, Stadlan EM, Mohandas A, Peterson HO (1969) Discographic-anatomical correlation of developmental changes with age in intervertebral disc. Acta Radiol 9: 733–739

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Aprill C, Bobduk N (1992) High intensity zone: a diagnostic sign of painful lumbar disc on magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol 65: 361–369

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dullerud R, Amundsen T, Lie H, Juel NG, Abdelnoor M, Magnaes B (1995) Clinical results after percutaneous automated lumbar nucleotomy. A follow-up study. Acta Radiol 36: 418–424

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Grevitt MP, McLaren A, Shackleford IM, Mulholland RC (1995) Automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy. An outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77: 626–629

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sortland O, Kleppe H, Aandahl M, Blikra G (1996) Percutaneous lumbar discectomy. Technique and clinical result. Acta Radiol 37: 85–90

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bernd L, Schiltenwolf M, Mau H, Schindele S (1997) No indications for percutaneous lumbar discectomy? Int Orthop 21: 164–168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Revel M, Payan C, Vallee C, et al (1993) Automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy versus chemonucleolysis in the treatment of sciatica. A randomized multicenter trial. Spine 18: 1–7

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Chatterjee S, Foy PM, Findlay GF (1995) Report of a controlled clinical trial comparing automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy and microdiscectomy in the treatment of contained lumbar disc herniation. Spine 20: 734–738

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Shapiro S (1995) Long-term follow up of 57 patients undergoing automated percutaneous discectomy. Neurosurgery 83: 31–33

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Lee SH, Lee SJ, Park KH, et al (1996) Comparison of percutaneous manual and endoscopic laser diskectomy with chemonucleolysis and automated nucleotomy. Orthopäde 25: 49–55

  42. Ramberg N, Sahlstrand T (2001) Early course and long-term follow-up after automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy. J Spinal Disord 14: 511–516

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Schreiber A, Suezawa Y, Leu H (1989) Does percutaneous nucleotomy with discoscopy replace conventional discectomy? Eight years of experience and results in treatment of herniated lumbar disc. Clin Orthop 238: 35–42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Stern MB (1989) Early experience with percutaneous lateral discectomy. Clin Orthop 238: 50–55

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Flam TA, Spitzenpfeil E, Zerbib M, Steg A, Debré B (1992) Complete ureteral transection associated with percutaneous lumbar disk nucleotomy. J Urol 148: 1249–1250

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hopper KD, Sherman JL, Luethke JM, Ghaed N (1987) Retrorenal colon in the supine and prone patient. Radiology 162: 443–446

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Prassopoulos P, Raissaki M, Daskalogiannaki M, Gourtsoyiannis N (1998) Retropsoas positioned bowel: incidence and clinical relevance. J Comput Assist Tomogr 22: 304–307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Monteiro A, Lefevre R, Pieters G, Wilmet E (1989) Lateral decompression of a pathological disc in the treatment of lumbar pain and sciatica. Clin Orthop 238: 56–63

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Dullerud R, Nakstad PH (1997) Side effects and complications of automated percutaneous lumbar nucleotomy. Neuroradiology 39: 282–285

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Contento G, Fabris G, Leonardi M, Belloni G, Bonaldi G (1989) Dose al paziente nelle procedure neuroradiologiche per il trattamento dell'ernia discale lombare. Riv Neuroradiol 2 [Suppl 1]: 55–59

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neuroradiology, Ospedali Riuniti, largo Barozzi 1, 24128, Bergamo, Italy

    G. Bonaldi

Authors
  1. G. Bonaldi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Bonaldi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bonaldi, G. Automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy: technique, indications and clinical follow-up in over 1000 patients. Neuroradiology 45, 735–743 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-003-1066-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-003-1066-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation