Skip to main content
Log in

Infarct size and recurrence of ventricular arrhythmias after defibrillator implantation

  • Original article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Infarct size as determined by perfusion imaging is an independent predictor of mortality after implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias (VA). However, its value as a predictor of VA recurrence and hospitalisation after ICD implantation is unknown. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate whether infarct size as determined by perfusion imaging can help to identify patients who are at high risk for recurrence of VA and hospitalisation after ICD implantation.We studied 56 patients with CAD and life-threatening VA. Before ICD implantation, all patients underwent a uniform study protocol including a thallium-201 stress-redistribution perfusion study. A defect score as a measurement of infarct size was calculated using a 17-segment 5-point scoring system. Study endpoints during follow-up were documented episodes of appropriate anti-tachycardia pacing and/or shocks for VA and cardiac hospitalisation for electrical storm (defined as three or more appropriate ICD interventions within 24 h), heart failure or angina. After a mean follow-up of 470±308 days, 22 patients (39%) had recurrences of VA. In univariate analysis, predictors for recurrence were: (a) ventricular tachycardia (VT) as the initial presenting arrhythmia (86% vs 59% for patients without ICD therapy, P=0.04), (b) treatment with β-blockers (36% vs 68%, P=0.03) and (c) a defect score (DS) ≥20 (64% vs 32%, P=0.03). In multivariate analysis, VT as the presenting arrhythmia (χ2=5.51, P=0.02) and a DS ≥20 (χ2=4.22, P=0.04) remained independent predictors. Cardiac hospitalisation was more frequent in patients with a DS ≥20 (44% vs 13% for patients with DS <20, P=0.015) and this was particularly due to more frequent hospitalisations for electrical storm (24% vs 3% for patients with DS<20, P=0.037). The extent of scarring determined by perfusion imaging can separate patients with CAD into high- and low-risk groups for recurrence of VA and cardiac hospitalisation after ICD implantation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received 27 December 1999 and in revised form 6 March 2000

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Sutter, J., Tavernier, R., Van de Wiele, C. et al. Infarct size and recurrence of ventricular arrhythmias after defibrillator implantation. Eur J Nucl Med 27, 807–815 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002590000261

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002590000261

Navigation