Skip to main content
Log in

Difficulties in removing ACE tibial intramedullary nail

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We experienced three cases of refracture and two cases of failure to remove the nail while trying to take out ACE tibial nails from healed tibial fractures. In order to determine the risk factors associated with difficulties in nail removal, these five patients were compared in the parameters of age, gender, duration of nail in situ, nail diameter, nail length, and level of fracture with 30 patients who had uneventful removal. Younger age of the patient was significantly associated with the difficulty in nail removal.

Résumé

Nous avons éprouvé trois cas de refractures et deux cas d'échec d'enlever le clou en essayant de prendre le clou tibial ACE de fractures tibiales guéries. Pour déterminer les facteurs du risque associé avec les difficultés dans déménagement du clou, ces cinq malades ont été comparés avec 30 malades qui avaient le déménagement sans incidents dans les paramètres maturation, genre, durée de clou dans situ, diamètre du clou, longueur du clou, le niveau de fracture. L'âge puîné des malades a été associé avec la difficulté dans déménagement de clou considérablement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig.1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boerger TO, Patel G, Murphy JP (1986) Is routine removal of intramedullary nails justified? Injury 30:79–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bone LB, Johnson KD (1986) Treatment of tibial fractures by reaming and intramedullary nailing. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 68: 877–887

    Google Scholar 

  3. Braten M, Nordby A, Terjesen T, Rossvoll I (1992) Bone loss after locked intramedullary nailing. Computed tomography of the femur and tibia in 10 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 63:310–314

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brumback RJ, Ellison TS, Poka A, Bathon GH, Burgess AR (1992) Intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures. Part III: Long-term effects of static interlocking fixation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 74:106–112

    Google Scholar 

  5. Court-Brown CM, Christie J, McQueen MM (1990) Closed intramedullary tibial nailing. Its use in closed and type I open fractures. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 72: 605–611

    Google Scholar 

  6. Court-Brown CM, Gustilo T, Shaw AD (1997) Knee pain after intramedullary tibial nailing: its incidence, etiology, and outcome. J Orthop Trauma 11:103–105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jones DH IV, Schmeling G (1999) Tibial fracture during removal of a tibial intramedullary nail. J Orthop Trauma 13:271–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Seligson D, Howard P A, Martin R (1997) Difficulty in removal of certain intramedullary nails. Clin Orthop 340:202–206

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Takakuwa M, Funakoshi M, Ishizaki K , Aono T, Hamaguchi H (1997) Fracture on removal of the ACE tibial nail. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 79:444–445

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Research Grant from Hallym University, Korea.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gun-Il Im.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Im, GI., Lee, KB. Difficulties in removing ACE tibial intramedullary nail. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 27, 355–358 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-003-0503-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-003-0503-4

Keywords

Navigation