Skip to main content
Log in

Functional comparison of total knee arthroplasty performed with and without a navigation system

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was undertaken to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes achieved using total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with and without a navigation system. This study included 43 TKAs performed with a navigation system and 42 TKAs without a navigation system with a minimum two-year follow-up. We compared clinical outcomes including range of motion, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores at the final follow-up. For radiological comparisons, we evaluated radiological alignment on standing radiographs of knees. HSS and WOMAC scores showed significant improvements at final follow-ups in both groups, but showed no significant inter-group differences (p > 0.05). Similarly, no significant differences were observed in range of motion (p = 0.962). TKAs performed with navigation showed significantly better outcomes in terms of mechanical angle and prosthetic alignment outliers than TKAs performed without navigation. However, we could not find any differences in functional outcomes between TKAs performed with or without a navigation system.

Résumé:

Cette étude a pour but de comparer le devenir clinique et radiologique de prothèses totales du genou avec ou sans utilisation d'un système de navigation. 43 prothèses ont été réalisées avec navigation et 42 sans navigation. Le suivi minimum a été de deux ans. Nous avons comparé les résultats cliniques incluant la mobilité, le score HSS, le score WOMAC. Sur le plan radiologique nous avons évalué les axes en position debout. Les scores HSS et WOMAC montraient une très nette amélioration au suivi final dans les deux groupes mais, sans différence significative entre-eux (p > 0,5). De la même façon nous n'avons pas trouvé de différence significative au niveau de la mobilité (p = 0,962). Par contre, la réalisation d'une prothèse totale du genou avec un système de navigation permet d'améliorer de façon significative l'axe mécanique angulaire de la prothèse en évitant un certain nombre d'anomalies axiales extrêmes que l'on peut rencontrer lorsque l'on réalise ces prothèses sans navigation. Cependant, il n'est pas possible de trouver une différence sur le plan fonctionnel entre les prothèses totales du genou réalisées avec ou sans système de navigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Luring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J (2004) Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:682–687

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brander VA, Stulberg SD, Adams A, Wood O (2004) CAS-TKA reduces the occurrence of functional outliers. Fourth Annual Meeting of CAOS International, Chicago, 87–88

  3. Bolognesi M, Hofmann A (2005) Computer navigation versus standard instrumentation of TKA: a single-surgeon experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 440:162–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ (2004) Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:372–377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chin PL, Yang KY, Yeo SJ, Lo NN (2005) Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J Arthroplasty 20:618–626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ensini A, Catani F, Leardini A, Romagnoli M, Giannini S (2007) Alignments and clinical results in conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 457:156–162

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Haaker RG, Stockheim M, Kamp M, Proff G, Breitenfelder J, Ottersbach A (2005) Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 433:152–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hart R, Janecek M, Chaker A, Bucek P (2003) Total knee arthroplasty implanted with and without kinematic navigation. Int Orthop 27:366–369

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA (1991) Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:709–714

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jenny JY, Boeri C (2001) Computer-assisted implantation of total knee prostheses: a case-control comparative study with classical instrumentation. Comput Aided Surg 6:217–720

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim YH, Kim JS, Yoon SH (2007) Alignment and orientation of the components in total knee replacement with and without navigation support: a prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:471–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Maculé-Beneyto F, Hernández-Vaquero D, Segur-Vilalta JM, Colomina-Rodríguez R, Hinarejos-Gomez P, García-Forcada I, Seral Garcia B (2006) Navigation in total knee arthroplasty. A multicenter study. Int Orthop 30:536–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Matsumoto T, Tsumura N, Kurosaka M, Muratsu H, Kuroda R, Ishimoto K, Tsujimoto K, Shiba R, Yoshiya S (2004) Prosthetic alignment and sizing in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 28:282–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C (2007) A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:236–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Perlick L, Bathis H, Tingart M, Perlick C, Grifka J (2004) Navigation in total-knee arthroplasty: CT-based implantation compared with the conventional technique. Acta Orthop Scand 75:464–470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Seon JK, Song EK (2004) The accuracy of lower extremity alignment in a total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted navigation system. J Korean Orthop Assoc 39:566–571

    Google Scholar 

  17. Seon JK, Song EK, Lee JY (2005) Comparison of range of motion of high-flexion prosthesis and mobile-bearing prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 28(10 Suppl):S1247–S1250

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A (2003) Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:830–835

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Stulberg SD, Laon P, Sarin V (2002) Computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: results of an initial experience in thirty-five patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A(Suppl 2):90–98

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Victor J, Hoste D (2005) Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:131–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eun Kyoo Song.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seon, J.K., Park, S.J., Lee, K.B. et al. Functional comparison of total knee arthroplasty performed with and without a navigation system. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 33, 987–990 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0594-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0594-z

Keywords

Navigation