Skip to main content
Log in

Long-term clinical results of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to investigate the mode of failure and survivorship of an independently performed series of medial Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasties. The study included 43 knees in 40 patients with a mean follow-up of 14.88 years: 13 knees (11 patients) had revision surgery (30%), and ten patients required conversion to total knee prosthesis. The mean International Knee Society (IKS) scores at the time of the revision were 145.52 [standard deviation (SD): 39.90, range: 167–200]. The overall alignment of the knee was restored to neutral, with a hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle average of 178° (SD: 3.21°, range: 170–186°). Survivorship, as defined by an endpoint of failure for any reason, showed that the survival rate at five years was 90%, at ten years 74.7% and at 15 years 70%. Excluding inappropriate patient selection and surgeon-associated failures, our survival analysis plot is much improved: survivorship at five years is 94.5%, at ten years 85.7% and at 15 years 80.4%. The Oxford meniscal bearing arthroplasty offers long-term pain relief with good knee function. Unfortunately, we demonstrated a high complication rate, with some of the failures encountered indicating that the surgical technique is very demanding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahlbäck S (1968) Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) Suppl 277:7–72

    Google Scholar 

  2. Argenson JN (1993) Biomechanical study of the Oxford knee prosthesis with mobile meniscus (in French). Chirurgie 119:268–272

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Clarius M, Hauck C, Seeger JB, James A, Murray DW, Aldinger PR (2009) Pulsed lavage reduces the incidence of radiolucent lines under the tibial tray of Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: pulsed lavage versus syringe lavage. Int Orthop published online 14 Feb 2009

  4. Emerson RH Jr, Higgins LL (2008) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the oxford prosthesis in patients with medial compartment arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:118–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Insall J, Aglietti P (1980) A five to seven-year follow-up of unicondylar arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62:1329–1337

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Insall J, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kennedy WR, White RP (1987) Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Postoperative alignment and its influence on overall results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 221:278–285

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Keys GW, Ul-Abiddin Z, Toh EM (2004) Analysis of first forty Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement from a small district hospital in UK. Knee 11:375–377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Koskinen E, Paavolainen P, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinen P, Remes V (2007) Unicondylar knee replacement for primary osteoarthritis: a prospective follow-up study of 1,819 patients from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 78:128–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kozinn SC, Scott RD (1988) Surgical treatment of unicompartmental degenerative arthritis of the knee. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 14:545–564

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar M (1999) Medial unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Knee 6:21–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Laskin RS (1978) Unicompartmental tibiofemoral resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60:182–185

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lewold S, Goodman S, Knutson K, Robertsson O, Lidgren L (1995) Oxford meniscal bearing knee versus the Marmor knee in unicompartmental arthroplasty for arthrosis. A Swedish multicenter survival study. J Arthroplasty 10:722–731

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lidgren L (2003) Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register: 2002 annual report. www.ort.lu.se/knee

  15. Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ (1998) The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:983–989

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pandit H, Jenkins C, Beard DJ, Gallagher J, Price AJ, Dodd CAF, Goodfellow JW, Murray DW (2009) Cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement shows reduced radiolucency at one year. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:185–189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Price AJ, Dodd CA, Svard UG, Murray DW (2005) Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients younger and older than 60 years of age. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1488–1492

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Price AJ, Waite JC, Svard U (2005) Long-term clinical results of the medial Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 435:171–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rajasekhar C, Das S, Smith A (2004) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. 2- to 12-year results in a community hospital. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:983–985

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Robertsson O, Lidgren L (2008) The short-term results of 3 common UKA implants during different periods in Sweden. J Arthroplasty 23:801–807

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rougraff BT, Heck DA, Gibson AE (1991) A comparison of tricompartmental and unicompartmental arthroplasty for the treatment of gonarthrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 273:157–164

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Skowronski J, Jatskewych J, Dlugosz J, Skowronski R, Bielecki M (2005) The Oxford II medial unicompartmental knee replacement. A minimum 10-year follow-up study. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 7:620–625

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Svärd UC, Price AJ (2001) Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:191–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Vorlat P, Verdonk R, Schauvlieghe H (2000) The Oxford unicompartmental knee prosthesis: a 5-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8:154–158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Weale AE, Murray DW, Crawford R, Psychoyios V, Bonomo A, Howell G, O’Connor J, Goodfellow JW (1999) Does arthritis progress in the retained compartments after ‘Oxford’ medial unicompartmental arthroplasty? A clinical and radiological study with a minimum ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:783–789

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominique Saragaglia.

Additional information

Reprints: Dominique Saragaglia, address above.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mercier, N., Wimsey, S. & Saragaglia, D. Long-term clinical results of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 34, 1137–1143 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0869-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0869-z

Keywords

Navigation