Abstract
Body size strongly predicts fighting behaviour and outcome in many species, with the larger opponent usually winning contests. However, recent fighting experience can have a strong influence on the establishment of dominance hierarchies, with recent winners being more likely to win subsequent contests, while recent losers are more likely to lose. Recent fighting experience therefore has the potential to modify the effect of body size in determining contest behaviour and outcome. Here, we investigate whether recent fighting experience weakens the role of body size in predicting contest behaviour in the black field cricket, Teleogryllus commodus. We compared the role of body size in determining contest outcome during initial non-physical encounters and escalated aggressive physical encounters (grapples), as well as the probability of escalation occurring, in contests involving either a naïve or experienced smaller male against a naïve larger male. We found that recent fighting experience only affected contest outcome during non-physical encounters. Once a contest had escalated into grappling, the effect of previous wins and losses was no longer apparent and body size strongly predicted contest outcome. Thus, once males can directly assess their opponent's fighting ability, recent fighting experience did not alter the effect of body size on contest behaviour and outcome.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnott G, Elwood RW (2009) Assessment of fighting ability in animal contests. Anim Behav 77:991–1004
Bakker Th CM, Bruijn E, Sevenster P (1989) Asymmetrical effects of prior winning and losing on dominance in sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Ethology 82:224–229
Briffa M (2008) Decisions during fights in the house cricket, Acheta domesticus: mutual or self assessment of energy, weapons and size? Anim Behav 75:1053–1062
Briffa M, Elwood RW (2001) Decision rules, energy metabolism and vigour of hermit-crab fights. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1841–1848
Briffa M, Elwood RW (2009) Difficulties remain in distinguishing between mutual and self-assessment in animal contests. Anim Behav 77:759–762
Chase ID, Bartolomeo C, Dugatkin LA (1994) Aggression interactions and inter-contest interval: how long to winners keep winning? Anim Behav 48:393–400
Daws AG, Grills J, Konzen K, Moore PA (2002) Previous experience alters the outcome of aggressive interactions between males in the crayfish, Procambarus clarkii. Mar Fresh Behav Physiol 35:139–148
Elias DO, Kasumovic MM, Punzalan D, Andrade MCB, Mason AC (2008) Assessment during aggressive contests between male jumping spider. Anim Behav 76:901–910
Hack MC (1997) Assessment strategies in the contests of male crickets, Acheta domesticus (L). Anim Behav 53:733–747
Hoefler CD (2002) Is contest experience a trump card? The interaction of residency status, experience, and body size on fighting success in Misumenoides formosipes (Araneae: Thomisidae). J Insect Behav 15:779–790
Hofman HA, Schildberger K (2001) Assessment of strength and willingness to fight during aggressive encounters in crickets. Anim Behav 62:337–348
Hofman HA, Stevenson PA (2000) Flight restores fight in crickets. Nature 403:613
Hsu Y, Wolf LL (1999) The winner and loser effect: integrating multiple experiences. Anim Behav 57:903–910
Hsu Y, Wolf LL (2001) The winner and loser effect: what fighting behaviours are influenced? Anim Behav 61:777–786
Hsu Y, Early RL, Wolf LL (2006) Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: mechanisms and contest outcomes. Biol Rev 81:33–74
Hsu Y, Lee IH, Lu CK (2009) Prior contest information: mechanisms underlying winner and loser effects. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:1247–1257
Humphries EL, Hebblethwaite AJ, Batchelor TP, Hardy ICW (2006) The importance of valuing resources: host weight and contender age as determinants of parasitoid wasp contest outcomes. Anim Behav 72:891–898
Kasumovic MM, Elias DO, Punzalan D, Mason AC, Andrade MCB (2009) Experience affects the outcome of agnostic contests without affect the selective advantage of size. Anim Behav 77:1533–1538
Pomfet J, Knell RJ (2006) Sexual selection and horn allometry in the dung beetle Euoniticellus intermedius. Anim Behav 71:567–576
Prenter J, Elwood RW, Taylor PW (2006) Self-assessment by males during energetically costly contest over precopula females in amphipods. Anim Behav 72:861–868
Rutte C, Taborsky M, Brinkhof MWG (2006) What sets the odds of winning and losing? Trends Ecol Evol 21:16–21
Savage KE, Hunt J, Jennions MD, Brooks R (2004) Male attractiveness covaries with fighting ability but not prior fight outcome in house crickets. Behav Ecol 16:196–200
Schuett GW (1997) Body size and agonistic experience affect dominance and mating success in male copperheads. Anim Behav 54:213–224
Seebacher F, Wilson RS (2007) Individual recognition in crayfish (Cherax dispar): roles of strength and experience in deciding aggressive encounters. Biol Lett 3:471–474
Shackleton MA, Jennions MD, Hunt J (2005) Fighting success and attractiveness as predictors of male mating success in the black field cricket Teleogryllus commodus: the effectiveness of no-choice tests. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 58:1–8
Taylor PW, Elwood RW (2003) The mismeasure of animal contests. Anim Behav 65:1195–1202
Whitehouse MEA (1997) Experience influences male-male contest in the spider Argyrodes antipodiana (Theridiidae: Araneae). Anim Behav 53:913–923
Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by the Australian Research Council (MDJ) and a Joyce Vickery Scientific Research Fund from the Linnaean Society of New South Wales (LTR). We thank James Davies for assistance in maintaining cricket stocks. We also thank Mark Briffa and two anonymous referees for valuable comments that greatly improved this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by D. Gwynne
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reaney, L.T., Drayton, J.M. & Jennions, M.D. The role of body size and fighting experience in predicting contest behaviour in the black field cricket, Teleogryllus commodus . Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65, 217–225 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-1030-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-1030-0